An Armed Citizenry Is A Free Citizenry, Which Is Why Liberals Want You Disarmed
The shooting tragedies in 2017 at Las Vegas, NV, in 2018 Parkland, Florida, and in 2019 Houston, Texas have reignited leftists’ calls for “gun control” or really the subversive aim is “gun confiscation. The lefty governor of Virginia along with the liberal legislature has passed another do nothing bill about crime called “Assault Weapons Ban.” Remember the Clinton administration implemented and passed a similar US wide 1994-2004 “Assault Weapons Ban.” The results were not significant on reducing gun related crime which we could have told them ahead of the legislation since most non-suicide gun violence deaths occur in the gangs in the inner cities. Like NAZI Germany, communists and other top-down dictatorial states, their first goal is to disarm the populace under the disguise of gun control with registration. Hollywood elites, democrats and the media left crowd proclaim that Trump is a NAZI and his administration is racist, incompetent etc; however, they are just “peachy keen” with our same inept administration being effective in controlling our 2nd Amendment rights.
Attacking firearms and ignoring criminals is not a solution to the crisis we face as a nation. Only honest, law-abiding gun owners will be affected and our families will remain vulnerable to the inevitability of more tragedy.
The most violent school attack in US history was the 1927 Bath School Township massacre of 37 elementary school children and 6 adults in Michigan initiated by detonating dynamite when a deranged failed politician took revenge—perhaps we need to take politicians’ guns away only to make us safer.
You hardly hear a report of a gun used for self-defense. The media has other priorities and using a gun to defend your life isn't part of their agenda. Maybe that's why the left thinks it can get away with its efforts to abolish the 2nd Amendment.
The Democrats and their MSM sycophants say they only want "common sense" gun control after clearly demonstrating they have no common sense whatsoever. They want you wait for the cops to show up after you have been attacked, robbed, or violated. It takes no sense of any kind to know that's too late.
The bad guys are not going to wait a half hour or so for help to arrive to save you. They'll be long gone and you or your family may be long dead.
Gun control is hitting what you aim at. That's a bit of common sense the left will never understand.
‘For some reason, gun-grabbing liberals seem to think that the existence of people who want to shoot random civilians should make us want to be less able to defend ourselves. Uh, no…Their goal is to slowly chip away at our gun rights until we wake up one day without our weapons living in Great Britain West, where the cops focus on busting dissenting subjects for mean tweets while Normal people can’t walk the streets without getting stabbed or splashed by acid by thugs who know damn well their victims are defenseless. The existence of murderous creeps, combined with a rising crime rate and the media beaming us scenes of oppression in Venezuela, where those dummies compounded their foolishness in electing socialists by allowing themselves to be disarmed, reinforce the imperative of American citizens remaining armed and unruly.
If the left wants chaos, an attempt to disarm us is the way to get it. We will never back down from our absolute and Creator-given right to defend our lives and freedom because disarmed, we stop being free citizens and become neutered serfs. And we’re not cool with that.’
The following article was written by Senator Chuck Grassley in response to President Obama’s executive action on gun control January 5, 2016.
******************************
Chuck Grassley: Second Amendment Myths and Facts
JANUARY 7, 2016 BY SHANE VANDER HART
U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, provided key facts surrounding rhetoric circulating about the Second Amendment in advance to President Barack Obama’s town hall meeting in January 2016 about his executive action on firearms.
Myth # 1: Firearm purchases at gun shows do not require a background check due to the “gun show loophole.”
Facts
· When the President and others refer to the “gun show loophole,” they imply that there are no background checks being done at gun shows. As a result, much of the public has been misinformed and are led to believe that individuals who purchase firearms at gun shows are not subject to a background check.
· In reality, there is no “gun show loophole.” If an individual wants to purchase a firearm from a licensed firearms retailer, which typically makes up the majority of vendors at gun shows, the individual must fill out the requisite federal firearms paperwork and undergo a National Instant Criminal Background Check System (“NICS”) background check.
· The only firearms that are being purchased at gun shows without a background check are those being bought and sold between individuals, peer-to-peer, as opposed to buying a firearm from a gun dealer. These private sales are no different from selling a personal hunting rifle to the owner’s niece or nephew down the road. It is a private sale and no background paperwork is required. The gun is private property and the sale is made like a sale of the family’s good silver. The one difference is that the locus of a gun show is being used to make the private sale.
· Under current law, an individual is permitted to occasionally sell part, or all, of their personal firearms collection. These private sellers, however, cannot be “engaged in the business” of selling firearms. “Engaged in the business” means they can’t repeatedly sell firearms with the principal objective of earning funds to support themselves. Some of the individuals who wish to sell a portion, or all, of their personal firearms collection do so at the show and might display their wares on a table. These “private table sales,” however, are private, peer-to-peer, sales and, therefore, do not require a background check. The President cannot change criminal statutes governing requirements for which sellers must conduct background checks. His new actions don’t do so and don’t claim to do so.
· In a peer-to-peer, private firearms transaction, it is already illegal to sell a firearm to another individual if the seller knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the buyer meets any of the prohibited categories for possession of a firearm (felon, fugitive, illegal alien, etc).
Myth # 2: Gun shows lack any law enforcement presence and are a free-for-all for felons and other prohibited individuals to obtain firearms.
Fact
· Local, state, and federal law enforcement are often present both in uniform and/or covertly in plain clothes to monitor and intervene in suspected unlawful firearms sales such as straw purchasing, purchases made by prohibited individuals, including non-residents, and the attempted sale of any illegal firearms.
Myth # 3: Individuals who purchase firearms on the internet are not subject to background checks.
Facts
· An individual cannot purchase a firearm directly from a firearms retailer over the internet and have that firearm shipped to them directly. An individual can pay for the firearm over the internet at websites and online sporting goods retailers. The firearm, however must be picked up from a federal firearms licensee (“FFL”) such as a gun store. In many cases, this is the brick and mortar store associated with the website where the gun purchase was made. Once at the retail store, the internet purchaser must then fill out the requisite forms, including ATF Form 4473, which initiates the NICS background check process. Thus, an internet purchase of a firearm from a firearms retailer does require a background check.
· Individuals, from the same state, are able to advertise and purchase firearms from one another and use the internet to facilitate the transaction. It is unlawful, under current law, to sell or transfer a firearm to an individual who is out-of-state. Any internet sale, even between individuals, that crosses state lines would have to utilize a federal firearms licensee (“FFL”), such as a gun store, and the purchaser would be required to fill out the requisite state and federal paperwork and would undergo a background check.
Myth # 4: President Obama’s January 5, 2016, executive action on gun control represents landmark change regarding gun control.
Facts
· With few exceptions, President Obama’s executive action on firearms is nothing more than rhetoric regarding the status quo. Many senators have long argued for better and more robust enforcement of existing laws that prohibit criminals from owning guns.
· It is the current law of the land that anyone engaged in the business of selling firearms must have a federal firearms license. The President’s action does not change current law, but merely restates existing court rulings on the meaning of “engaged in the business.”
Myth # 5: The Obama Administration has made firearms enforcement a priority.
Facts
· The Obama Administration has used its limited criminal enforcement resources to focus on clemency for convicted and imprisoned felons, the investigation of police departments, and on civil rights cases. The latter two categories represent important work, but the Department of Justice lost track of one of its core missions of enforcing criminal law: prosecuting violent criminals, including gun criminals.
· The Obama Administration is only now making firearms enforcement a priority. Clearly, enforcing the gun laws is a new initiative, or one of the President’s actions would not have been informing all of the 93 U.S. Attorneys about it.
· Proof of this lack of enforcement is revealed in the decline of weapons related prosecutions during the Obama administration. As data obtained from the Executive Office of United States Attorneys, through a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request, reveal, firearms prosecutions are down approximately 25 percent under the Obama administration versus the last year of the Bush administration.
Myth # 6: Mental health has nothing to do with gun control.
Facts
· People with certain levels of mental illness are not permitted to own guns. Many of the recent mass killings were committed by mentally ill individuals. One of the keys to preventing further mass shootings and violence committed with firearms is addressing the issue of mental health.
· Background checks to prevent the mentally ill from obtaining guns can only work if states provide mental health records to the NICS system. Too many states have failed to do so. Many of the worst offenders are states with the most stringent gun control laws. For multiple years now, many members of Congress have repeatedly called for and introduced legislation that would provide incentives for states to submit their mental health records for inclusion in the NICS database.
Myth # 7: President Obama’s executive action on gun control will thwart criminals’ ability to obtain firearms.
Facts
· The President’s executive action regarding firearms is focused primarily on individuals who attempt to purchase firearms through the background check process.
· Criminals, however, obtain firearms in myriad illegal ways, including home invasion robbery, trading narcotics for firearms, burglary of homes, vehicles, and businesses, as well as straw purchasing.
· Grassley legislation, s.a. 725, was specifically designed to combat the straw purchasing of firearms as well as firearms traffickers who transfer firearms to prohibited individuals and out-of-state residents.
Myth #8: There is a general consensus in America that greater gun control is needed to prevent mass shootings in the United States.
Facts
· Despite the President’s statement to the contrary, polls have shown that the majority of Americans do not believe that stricter gun control would reduce the number of mass shootings in the United States.
· The American public does not believe that making it harder for law abiding Americans to obtain guns makes America safer. In fact, polls have shown that a majority of Americans thinks the United States would be safer if there were more individuals licensed and trained to carry concealed weapons. A majority opposes re-imposition of the “assault weapons” ban.
Myth # 9: The terrorist “no-fly” list is a proper mechanism to bar Americans from purchasing firearms. – President Barack Obama, January 5, 2016
Fact
· The no-fly list is actually multiple lists, which are generated in secret and controlled by executive branch bureaucrats. The Second Amendment right to bear arms has been determined by the U.S. Supreme Court to be a fundamental right. This puts the right to bear arms in our most closely guarded rights similar to the right to free speech and freedom of religion. It is unconstitutional to deprive an American citizen of their Second Amendment right without notice and an opportunity to be heard.
Myth # 10: Gun retailers need to step up and refuse to sell semi-automatic weapons. – President Barack Obama, January 5, 2016
Fact
· There is nothing unlawful about a semi-automatic firearm. A semi-automatic firearm simply means that a round is discharged with each pull of the trigger. These include most shotguns used for waterfowl hunting and rifles commonly used for target shooting.
******************************
Editor & Founder at Caffeinated Thoughts
Shane Vander Hart is the founder and editor-in-chief of Caffeinated Thoughts. He is also the President of 4:15 Communications, LLC, a social media & communications consulting/management firm. Prior to this Shane spent 20 years in youth ministry serving in church, parachurch, and school settings. He has also served as an interim pastor and is a sought after speaker and pulpit fill-in. Shane has been married to his wife Cheryl since 1993 and they have three kids. Shane and his family reside near Des Moines, IA.
No comments:
Post a Comment