Submitted by: W.G.E.N.
We have had decades of *judicial rulings* that are so distant from the constitution it isn't funny.
The constitution isn't that hard to understand - it is pretty darned clear, IMHO.
If anyone want to come to America they are to APPLY from their home country and await the next step in the application form. All those who try to come here in any other manner are INVADERS and have no intention of obeying our rules and laws so they need to be REFUSED ANY ENTRY AT ALL.
The constitution isn't that hard to understand - it is pretty darned clear, IMHO.
If anyone want to come to America they are to APPLY from their home country and await the next step in the application form. All those who try to come here in any other manner are INVADERS and have no intention of obeying our rules and laws so they need to be REFUSED ANY ENTRY AT ALL.
A total revision of the so called Visa laws and rules needs to be given one of the Oxi-Clean baths and all the dirt that has been attached to the Visa ruled will be dissolved and get back to the basis for Visa laws. Most of those coming here have NO intention of assimilating or adapting to our America Culture. They are coming to get all the things they can without becoming a contributing and productive part of America - they are TEAT SUCKERS. We have enough of those who are legal Americans now days with the gimmee gimmee mentality that the Welfare programs brought forth. SOCIALISM - a long way from the REPUBLIC the Founding Fathers created for us.
Reduce the number of courts and reduce the foolishness of most of the cases that tie up the courts. Reducing the number of **laws* which CREATE law suits would be a great start. All these *laws* are created to give government more control over the citizens.
Jackie Juntti
WGEN idzrus@earthlink.net
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
Everyone wants FREE STUFF - Well, ignorance is FREE so that explains a lot.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
https://www.bizpacreview.com/
![[]](https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/OTmGj17_JyOgO_fBLsvStQiFpS7z3D9S0AdfERhYON0IKaV9UNu8pxp2C7Jv4pTTaU7itnJCu2npRoGg5LqvXC9UBjJ6NkwzFeJeVPoz_VGpRvoqTykWqckkPos=s0-d-e1-ft#https://www.bizpacreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/SG-Mark-Levin.jpg)
(Video screenshot)
Late last year then-Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen announced a new policy designed to stop illegal aliens from gaming the system by using America’s lax asylum laws to disappear into the heartland and out of the reach of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
“Aliens trying to game the system to get into our country illegally will no longer be able to disappear into the United States, where many skip their court dates. Instead, they will wait for an immigration court decision while they are in Mexico,” she saidin a statement at the time.
On Monday a federal judge blocked this policy, thus handing the Trump administration yet another defeat. The administration’s efforts to repeal the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and deny asylum to seekers who cross into the U.S. illegally have all faced a similar fate.
And last week a federal judge in Washington issued a ruling in which she essentially “ said it’s up to the U.S. government to prove why [detained illegal aliens] shouldn’t be released.”
Speaking later Monday evening about the latest ruling, renowned conservative political commentator and former Reagan administration official Mark Levin argued that the country isn’t being overrun with illegal aliens because of bad policy-making but rather because of the courts.
“You want to know why this country is being overrun?” he said. “Because of the federal courts interfering in immigration. They never did that with Obama. … When Arizona said, ‘You know what, we’re going to enforce federal immigration laws, whether Obama does it or not,’ the Supreme Court 5-4, with Anthony Kennedy writing the opinion, said, ‘No, you’re not. The president gets to decide.'”
“So the new president decided, and now these courts say, ‘Actually, the president doesn’t get to decide. We get to decide.’ Every step of the way he’s fought by the courts!”
Listen:
He wasn’t wrong. Every single time that President Donald Trump has enacted a policy to curb illegal immigration or halt the growing border crisis, he’s been thwarted by “ liberal activist judges” such as San Francisco Judge Richard Seeborg, the Obama appointee responsible for the latest ruling.
“A liberal activist judge in San Francisco ruled the United States and Mexico can’t work together to address asylum issues at the border,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders angrily remarked on Twitter Monday evening after Seeborg’s ruling was announced.
“It’s sad that Mexico is now doing more to secure our border than Democrats – President Trump will do whatever it takes to keep Americans safe.”
“Behind the scenes, two sources told CNN, the President told border agents to not let migrants in. Tell them we don’t have the capacity, he said. If judges give you trouble, say, ‘Sorry, judge, I can’t do it. We don’t have the room,'” the far-left news outlet reported Tuesday.
“The next time an Obama-nominated resistance-type district court judge reaches an absurd legal conclusion and attempts to issue a (completely lawless) nationwide injunction against a prized Trump administration priority, the president should effectively tell that judge to go take a hike,” political commentator Josh Hammer opined back in January.
Others say Trump should simply appeal the rulings and wait for the Supreme Court to issue its own decision. The only problem with this strategy is it requires waiting for months, if not years.
Take the president’s travel ban. Though he signed it into law in January of 2017, it wasn’t until June of 2018 that the Supreme Court finally upheld it, thus allowing the ban to go into effect.
Nevertheless, if Trump were to defy judicial orders, it could create legal jeopardy for him. It might also negatively impact his polling numbers going into the 2020 election.
This is perhaps why some seem to prefer that the president pursue the legal route:
Reduce the number of courts and reduce the foolishness of most of the cases that tie up the courts. Reducing the number of **laws* which CREATE law suits would be a great start. All these *laws* are created to give government more control over the citizens.
Jackie Juntti
WGEN idzrus@earthlink.net
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
Everyone wants FREE STUFF - Well, ignorance is FREE so that explains a lot.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
https://www.bizpacreview.com/
Levin warns of judicial supremacy, says country is ‘overrun’ by federal courts ‘interfering in immigration’
April 9, 2019 | Vivek Saxena | Print Article (Video screenshot)Late last year then-Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen announced a new policy designed to stop illegal aliens from gaming the system by using America’s lax asylum laws to disappear into the heartland and out of the reach of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
“Aliens trying to game the system to get into our country illegally will no longer be able to disappear into the United States, where many skip their court dates. Instead, they will wait for an immigration court decision while they are in Mexico,” she saidin a statement at the time.
On Monday a federal judge blocked this policy, thus handing the Trump administration yet another defeat. The administration’s efforts to repeal the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and deny asylum to seekers who cross into the U.S. illegally have all faced a similar fate.
And last week a federal judge in Washington issued a ruling in which she essentially “ said it’s up to the U.S. government to prove why [detained illegal aliens] shouldn’t be released.”
Speaking later Monday evening about the latest ruling, renowned conservative political commentator and former Reagan administration official Mark Levin argued that the country isn’t being overrun with illegal aliens because of bad policy-making but rather because of the courts.
“You want to know why this country is being overrun?” he said. “Because of the federal courts interfering in immigration. They never did that with Obama. … When Arizona said, ‘You know what, we’re going to enforce federal immigration laws, whether Obama does it or not,’ the Supreme Court 5-4, with Anthony Kennedy writing the opinion, said, ‘No, you’re not. The president gets to decide.'”
“So the new president decided, and now these courts say, ‘Actually, the president doesn’t get to decide. We get to decide.’ Every step of the way he’s fought by the courts!”
Listen:
He wasn’t wrong. Every single time that President Donald Trump has enacted a policy to curb illegal immigration or halt the growing border crisis, he’s been thwarted by “ liberal activist judges” such as San Francisco Judge Richard Seeborg, the Obama appointee responsible for the latest ruling.
“A liberal activist judge in San Francisco ruled the United States and Mexico can’t work together to address asylum issues at the border,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders angrily remarked on Twitter Monday evening after Seeborg’s ruling was announced.
“It’s sad that Mexico is now doing more to secure our border than Democrats – President Trump will do whatever it takes to keep Americans safe.”
- A liberal activist judge in San Francisco ruled the United States and Mexico can’t work together to address asylum issues at the border. It’s sad that Mexico is now doing more to secure our border than Democrats – President Trump will do whatever it takes to keep Americans safe.
- Sarah Sanders (@PressSec) April 9, 2019
“Behind the scenes, two sources told CNN, the President told border agents to not let migrants in. Tell them we don’t have the capacity, he said. If judges give you trouble, say, ‘Sorry, judge, I can’t do it. We don’t have the room,'” the far-left news outlet reported Tuesday.
- Trump told border agents to break U.S. law and defy judicial orders https://t.co/Mq2yyX42Mo pic.twitter.com/AYi6B4lNMz
- Justin Miller (@justinjm1) April 8, 2019
“The next time an Obama-nominated resistance-type district court judge reaches an absurd legal conclusion and attempts to issue a (completely lawless) nationwide injunction against a prized Trump administration priority, the president should effectively tell that judge to go take a hike,” political commentator Josh Hammer opined back in January.
- I’ll just leave this here. https://t.co/ezUKKPgQkG
- Josh Hammer (@josh_hammer) April 3, 2019
Others say Trump should simply appeal the rulings and wait for the Supreme Court to issue its own decision. The only problem with this strategy is it requires waiting for months, if not years.
Take the president’s travel ban. Though he signed it into law in January of 2017, it wasn’t until June of 2018 that the Supreme Court finally upheld it, thus allowing the ban to go into effect.
Nevertheless, if Trump were to defy judicial orders, it could create legal jeopardy for him. It might also negatively impact his polling numbers going into the 2020 election.
This is perhaps why some seem to prefer that the president pursue the legal route:
- Bring the issue to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will likely put an end to any judge in any state issuing a ruling that shuts down federal immigration laws.
- Jesse Cox (@jessecox1953) April 9, 2019
- The majority of 9th Circuit rulings are overturned by the Supreme Court. You better get right on it Don !!
- Charlie Cross (@ChazzCross) April 9, 2019
- @realDonaldTrump LIBERAL SAN FRAN. JUDGE CLUELESS! POOR AREAS OF U.S. MUCH MORE DANGEROUS THAN MEXICO! CRIME STATISTICS SHOW THIS! TRUMP MUST LET SUPREME COURT RULE JUDICIARY CANT BE ALLOWED TO MAKE U.S. POLICY! #potus #Trump #law #TuesdayMotivation #Immigration #mexico
- jackspointofview (@robpointofview) April 9, 2019
- @realDonaldTrump My President: You should Immediately go to the Supreme Court to keep all the Illegal Aliens in Mexico. Maybe,you could ask the U.S. Supreme Court to give you aTemporaryInjunction to StopIllegalAliens inMexico from entering U.S.A.
- Pete Perez (@marineswarvettt) April 9, 2019
- Have the Supreme Court crush his opinion and his ruling. Just another Obama stooge.
- Mary Jane Smith (@MaryJan96795800) April 9, 2019
- Take it to the Supreme Court. This is out of their jurisdiction and exceeds their limitations. If we had a Republican majority Congress, these judges would be Impeachable.
- Citizens’Rights (@USCitizenRights) April 9, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment