Tuesday, March 5, 2019

DEATH OF THE REPUBLIC

Submitted by: Chuck Kolb

DEATH OF THE REPUBLIC
Researched and Presented by The North American Law Center, Inc.
A non-profit Constitutional and Military Law Research and Education Group
©2019
As the nation is transfixed upon the daily political circus playing out on TV, radio and social media, none of which is at all important, the real actions against the Republic advance without comment or notice. Without a state controlled leftist media, none of the real threats to America presented in this report could exist.

The simple truth is the vast majority of American citizens are so disconnected from reality, disengaged in determining the future of their own country and totally baffled by a constant media diet of bravo sierra that the Republic is on the brink of complete destruction and the average American can’t see it coming… even in close-up view.

The small minority of Citizens who can see it coming, have no clue what to do about it and in fact, in many cases, they are an unwitting active participant in the demise of our once great Republic.

A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER – The Democrat “Socialist” Party

A current public survey of Democrat voters revealed that a stunning 77% of Democrat voters in the USA now believe that “socialism” will make America a better country. Despite a global history of a 100% unprecedented failure rate, 77% of modern Democrat voters believe that socialism is a better idea than freedom and liberty.

Certainly, this presents a grave threat to the U.S. Constitutional Republic and personal freedom and liberty for every American citizen. However, it does not make the TOP 5 list of most critical threats to the USA as it has existed since July 4, 1776. The 23% of Democrat voters who do not yet support socialism for America and 100% of the Republican and Independent voters can deal with this threat in the election booth by simply overwhelmingly rejecting any and all forms of totalitarianism. END OF THREAT! (If they do it!)
The TOP 5 Threats

…to the U.S. Constitutional Republic are not so easily dealt with…in part due to massive intentional misinformation on the subjects, resulting in errant support for the movements by unsuspecting and ill-educated citizens, who know not what they do.

Although a Constitutional Amendment is a long road via constitutional process, with unlikely success, the movement is none the less very dangerous as it seeks to strip all corporations of any “constitutional protections” on the false basis that “corporations are not real legal entities” equal to “persons.”

In reality, a corporation is nothing more or less than the sum of its make-up, “people.” Incorporating simply allows “people” to act together in concert towards common goals and interests. Corporations have other legal names, “employers, consumers, investors, organizations, charities, municipalities, etc.,” in other words, “people.” While it’s true that a corporation is not one person, it is also true that corporations are made up of “people.”

Corporations exist to act in the benefit of its members, its investors, its employees, etc. It is not possible to remove the constitutional protections for corporations without eliminating those protections for every “person” who is in one way or another, a part of that corporation.

This movement has taken the form of H.J.Res.48 — 116th Congress (2019-2020), titled “Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only.”

NO “Rights” are “extended by the U.S. Constitution.” All Rights in the USA are “endowed by our Creator” and as such, they are “inalienable” by man, including through congressional acts which are themselves, unconstitutional in nature. Further, what “Rights” or protections do corporations have that they should not have? A Right to face their accusers? A Right to a Defense and Due Process of Law? A Right to privacy? A Right to Property? The Right to be safe and secure in their legal affairs?

H.J.Res.48 is backed by the usual suspects in congress; Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-WA-7], Rep. McCollum, Betty [D-MN-4], Rep. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large], Rep. DeFazio, Peter A. [D-OR-4], Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17], Rep. Ryan, Tim [D-OH-13], Rep. Blumenauer, Earl [D-OR-3], Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-41], Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9], Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1], Rep. Gabbard, Tulsi [D-HI-2], Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-11], Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2], Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-13], Rep. Moulton, Seth [D-MA-6], Rep. Omar, Ilhan [D-MN-5], Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2], Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-NY-20], Rep. Raskin, Jamie [D-MD-8], Rep. Pingree, Chellie [D-ME-1].

H.J.Res.48 should be titled “The Elimination of Free Market Capitalism Amendment” and although it currently has a long-shot chance of taking effect in the USA, it warrants close monitoring and defeat.
THREAT #4 – The Creation of “undocumented citizenship”

For more than 240-years following the formation of the United States of America in the U.S. Constitution, anyone who was not a “documented” citizen of the United States, either by Nature, Native status or U.S. Naturalization Laws, was NOT a “citizen” at all.

Key to this issue is the Right of legal U.S. Citizens to vote.

Since the birth of our nation, only Natural Born, Native Born and Legally Naturalized individuals were “legal citizens” of this country. As a result, only such “documented citizens” were eligible to vote in the United States.

Prior to 1971 and the 26th Amendment, only “documented” citizens who had reached the age of 21 were eligible to vote. That legal voting age was dropped to 18 in the 26th Amendment signed into law by then President Richard M. Nixon.

Today, there is a multi-front movement to create a new category of legal citizenship eligible to vote in U.S. Elections, the “undocumented citizen.” The so-called “undocumented citizen” is properly identified in U.S. Law as an “illegal alien,” someone who resides within the borders of the United States but is not a legal (documented) citizen of the United States.

In short, the “undocumented citizen” is nothing more than an “illegal alien.” If you are not a “documented citizen” in the United States, you are not a citizen of the United States. No matter the circumstance that left you in this status, you are not legally eligible to vote. Of course, that’s until politicos create the new type of U.S. citizenship commonly referred to as “undocumented.”

Already we have seen “undocumented” individuals in the USA vote, run for and hold political offices. We have seen one “undocumented” citizen occupy the Oval Office for two terms. We watch millions of “undocumented” individuals vote, access public welfare resources, attend our schools in a status equal to any legally documented U.S. citizen and all of it at great taxpayer expense.

Even as we attempt to build a wall to prevent further illegal invasion of our country, elected and appointed government officials work around the clock to make every “citizen of the world” a voting citizen of the USA, “no documents required.”

If allowed to continue, American citizens will very soon find themselves a minority group in their own country. This process is one of the TOP 5 methods through which global socialists are forever altering the demographic make-up and voting population of the United States and their end goal is the demise of our Constitutional Republic.

THREAT #4 must be stopped dead or this is no longer our country! But this threat cannot be solved in the voting booth!
THREAT #3 – Subversion of the Constitutional Republic via the Judiciary

Author of our Declaration of Independence and Founding Father Thomas Jefferson warned soon after the adoption of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, that they had failed to “tie the hands of the judiciary” enough to prevent them from becoming the greatest threat to the Republic.

In a letter to A. Coray date, October 31, 1823, Jefferson wrote – ““At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change by construction, before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life if secured against all liability to account.”

The Article III Judicial Branch is unelected and unaccountable to the people. These positions are mere political appointments. Jefferson was dead right! – “The germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the constitution of the federal Judiciary; an irresponsible body (for impeachment is scarcely a scare-crow) working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped.” (Letter to Charles Hammond, August 18, 1821)

Since then, the Judicial Branch has become omni-powerful and totally destructive of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. Even a duly elected President cannot escape the claws of the ever-overreaching power-drunk branch of government that was originally designed to be the least powerful of all.

·        GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT rules today in the Judicial Branch. Federal Prosecutors enjoy a stunning 99.8% criminal conviction rate. Are the prosecutors just that good at what they do? Does the government only charge open-n-shut easy conviction cases? Are 499 out of every 500 charged with a crime, really guilty?
·        Who has made more laws in the USA over the past hundred years, Congress or the Courts? Which has sole lawmaking authority under the US Constitution?
·        Is an elected President a servant of the 3rd branch?
·
...

[Message clipped]  View entire message

No comments:

Post a Comment