CHRISTINE FORD'S 'ALIBI' WITNESS WOULD NOT LIE FOR HER

Submitted by: Damselnusa

https://web.archive.org/web/20180927123412/http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/

CULT OF THE 1ST AMENDMENT

THE DOCUMENTED CULTURE OF SEXUAL ABUSE UPON YOUNG BOYS BY SENIOR GIRLS AT CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD’S HIGH SCHOOL MUST BE INVESTIGATED.

Now that Christine Blasey Ford’s yearbooks have been unscrubbed from the web, the Senate Judiciary Committee has access to written evidence - published directly by the Holton-Arms School - documenting intimate relationships between senior girls and freshman/sophomore boys from other schools. Some of these relationships may have involved sexual intercourse, or other sexual activity, both potentially rising to 2d Degree Rape in Maryland, a felony.

Other criminal sexual activity perpetrated by senior girls on young boys equates to 4^th degree sexual crime, a misdemeanor.

Since there is no statute of limitations for felony sex crimes, a proper investigation needs to take place. Convictions are still possible if any of the boys come forward related to the felonies. Misdemeanors are outside the statute of limitations but must still be investigated, as they will show how the Holton-Arms senior girls sexually dominated young boys.

Read the caption above:

“Like a free bird – Or, at least we hope that’s what Leland is screaming.”

Her name was Leland Ingham when she was at Holton-Arms School with Christine Blasey Ford. And she was supposed to be the star witness today. Christine named her as one of the four other people – and the only girl- who supposedly attended the party where she alleges to have been assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh.

But just minutes after I published my second report concerning disturbing racism deliberately inserted within the pages of the Holton-Arms yearbooks, Leland Ingham Keyser (her current name) issued a statement through her lawyers wherein she unequivocally testified that Christine Blasey should not have named her as having been there. Leland said that she had never heard of the party or incident, and that she had never met Brett Kavanaugh.

What happened? Leland and Christine are life-long friends. Why would Christine name Leland as a corroborating witness if it wasn’t true? And why isn’t anyone asking that question. Again and again. Until it’s answered. How could Christine get that wrong?

She didn’t get it wrong. Leland was going to back her up. Then she got scared. Then she wanted out. Not so fast.

It’s truly frightening. Had the yearbooks not surfaced, Leland Ingham - the girl screaming at the young boy above – would be subjecting Brett Kavanaugh to a Holton sized dose of career ending humiliation.

And why did Cristina King, who was in the class of 1983, one year ahead of Christine Blasey at Holton-Arms, post on Facebook that she did not know Christine personally, but only remembered her? Why did Cristina King say Blasey was “a year or so” behind her at Holton-Arms when King knew exactly when Blasey graduated? The ugly truth is that they were good friends. Cristina King was the party queen. The yearbooks document that she entertained all of the girls at her infamous house parties.

Christine Blasey Ford was not supposed to be going it alone. She had all of her ducks lined up. But they swam away. That is the real story here. What caused Cristina and Leland to run?

THE YEARBOOKS SPOILED THE PLOT

Cristina King was supposed to set Brett Kavanaugh up with a jab from a distance, then Leland would come with a right hook, knocking Brett Kavanaugh out for the count. Since Cristina was one year ahead, she could make it appear as if she didn’t really know Christine Blasey. By putting distance between the two girls, her original Facebook post – now fully retracted – made it seem as if the alleged assault was common knowledge. If the two weren’t close friends, King’s statement would be that much more objective under public scrutiny. (King fully retracted. She now says she has no actual knowledge of the matter.)

...

[Message clipped]  View entire message