Bertrand Daily Report
The War For Our Mind & Soul Continues
Subject: America has not been in such disarray or trouble since 1776.
By Dave Bertrand (#DaveBertrand@BertrandDave1)
The
"Witch Hunt" to further take-down Trump is the strategic move by the
Communist Left to (1) force Trump into appeasing the Dems with globalist
anti-Russian (DNC agents) to replace Cabinet Members (2) eventually
cause Trump to be impeached or 25th'd out-of-office and (3) to re-take
the United States government as their own Communist Empire.
We
are seeing the first phase of an all-out civil war in America where
armies on both sides are grouping for the all out assault against each
other. Trump's unifying speech to Congress has gained him a 75% approval rating, but like a hot air balloon of unification rising from the ground, the Communist Left
have grabbed the ropes and attempting to crash that balloon. They don't
care about this country, but instead want to destroy America for their
own globalist agenda.
Tons
of money is being lost by globalist elites because of failed global
trade deals and the Military Industrial Complex arms deals are
in jeopardy under a Trump Administration. Countries like China and India
will begin losing U.S. manufacturers and the Socialist / Communist
plans for open borders will destroy the Democratic Party.
CIA
"Black Projects" financed by international drug smuggling into America
and onto the streets of America and (their) al Qaeda / ISIS operatives
used for taking down certain world leaders is a major part of the
ongoing attempt to get Trump in-order....or removed.
"Pizzagate"
and the worldwide pedophile / sex trafficking operation is controlled
by the CIA and through the United Nations in-order to blackmail world
leaders and U.S. Congressmen and political leaders into compliance.
That's why there is an attempt to "Dossier" Trump into a sex scandal
that has failed.....
While Jeff Sessions might be the next shoe to fall under Trump, the Dems are not going to crawl back into their spider holes anytime soon.
Trump's hands are tied because his Cabinet picks are being held-up as part of the Communist strategy to maneuver certain Cabinet Members.
If Trump acts now to rein-in certain Dems and possibly one of his own GOP (McCain),
reference "cleaning out the swamp," then Trump's attempt to get certain
Executive Orders and economic plans in place soon....continues to be an
uphill battle.
The clever Dems know what they are doing, but will it backfire later?
The Dems have a wide range of hypocritical backlash coming. From Hillary selling U.S. Uranium
(located in a National Park region) to a Russian conglomerate (Uranium
One), Eric Holder's lying about "Fast and Furious," Clapper's lying to
Congress about spying on Americans, Loretta Lynch's backroom deal with
Bill Clinton, the Clinton Foundation's acceptance of millions from
Moscow and Saudi Arabia, Hillary lying under oath, and the "Pizzagate"
scandal that is an ongoing international round-up....the Dems know what
they could be facing under a strong Judicial adjutant, therefore....they
have to get rid of Jeff Sessions. THEY know he has been briefed and
would likely act accordingly.
In
the meanwhile, Obama and Eric Holder are moving at a rapid pace to
formulate an army of radicals to demonize the Trump Administration at
every turn.
The DNC has gone from being the Liberal "good old boy" to a Party that has now openly shown their faces as supporters of the Marxist
ideology, while organizing Socialists that want to undermine every
American with Muslim Sharia Law, open borders and appeasement to
outlandish groups declaring equal rights.
At
the same time....mainstream Liberals are seeing their Party dissolve
into chaos and rhetoric unbecoming of what they call a "Democracy,"
thus....Liberals are leaving their Party in droves.
The Dems are re-introducing "McCarthyism" for their "Witch Hunt," with the uncanny attempt to discount their own Communist agenda.
The DNC have put the face of a La Raza (The Race) and the Muslim Brotherhood...Ellison
at the forefront, an internal battle with Obama's OFA Brigade of thugs
in-order to grab Obama's base of support.....initially intended to
control the DNC, but now together to unify a Party that has gone
completely radical.
I
would say we are winning, but Trump is making it appear to the Dems,
that they are winning....and when the dust settles and all Cabinet
Members are in-place and all policies are streamlined into some type of
orderly fashion, all hell will break lose when many heads begin to
roll.....of which Hillary Clinton could likely be the "poster child" for
a Trump revenge, followed by Obama arrested (maybe) for Treason.
The Dems are scared shitless and WE must continue to hammer the truth upon them like water being thrown on a witch.
America has not been in such disarray or trouble since 1776.
Source: Huffington Post
My latest Counter Propa article highlights the U.S. Russia uranium deal that sent 20% uranium capacity to Russia. In 2015, The New York Times
stated “As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in
three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a
flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.”
Has Vox or POLITIFACT analyzed this quote?
Or just Trump’s wild accusations?
The next paragraph in this New York Times
piece states “And shortly after the Russians announced their intention
to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received
$500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links
to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.”
Vox,
POLITIFACT, and others haven’t commented on the two quotes above and
have only pontificated against President Trump’s awkwardly worded
claims.
Hillary
Clinton didn’t “give up” 20% of U.S. uranium to Russia, but Uranium One
donations to the Clinton Foundation might have influenced the State
Department and Obama’s administration to approve the deal.
Was
it merely coincidence that Uranium One officials were Clinton
Foundation donors, or is there legitimate conflict of interest?
Also, did the FBI tape Bill Clinton’s speech at a Moscow bank?
There’s absolutely no way for Vox or any other Clinton public relations firm to spin the fact Bill Clinton received $500,000 from a Moscow bank with ties to the Kremlin.
Also,
nothing said at Trump’s press conference refutes the fact Uranium One
officials donated millions to the Clinton Foundation amid the sale of
U.S. uranium to Russia.
After Trump’s recent press conference, millions of Clinton loyalists gleefully read a POLITIFACT piece titled Donald Trump repeats his Mostly False claim about Hillary Clinton, Russia and uranium.
That POLITIFACT piece references another POLITIFACT article titled In a nuclear claim, Donald Trump says Hillary Clinton ‘gave up’ one-fifth of U.S. uranium to Russia.
Both
articles rate the truthfulness of Trump’s accusation that Clinton “gave
up” (or was solely responsible) for the uranium sale.
As
with all Clinton scandals, the entire story is far more complicated
(with defenders focusing on semantics and plausible deniability more
than possible foul play), and leads to a major conflict of interest;
especially in today’s neo-McCarthy Democratic Party.
Frist, Clinton didn’t even intentionally use a private server, so she didn’t “give up” 20% of U.S. uranium all by herself.
The issue POLITIFACT, Vox and others conveniently circumvent is the New York Times
quote stating “As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One
in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records
show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.”
Did millions of dollars to her Foundation influence Clinton?
Furthermore, three FBI field offices
wanted to investigate the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Foundation
has been the subject of quid pro quo controversies, from an AP report to weapons deals. Last year’s AP Report states millions in donations correlated with access to America’s Secretary of State:
At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The Associated Press. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million.
If you replace Clinton with Trump in the story above, how would Washington Post journalists react? 85 people give $156 million to Trump’s foundation and nobody questions the transfer of money?
This
story (if Trump were the subject) would spark outrage today. Instead,
Vox and others defended Clinton and denied any possible conflict to
interest.
As
for the uranium deal (approved under an Obama administration that
eventually sanctioned Russia for alleged election tampering), it’s
similar to Clinton’s weapons deal scandal reported by the International Business Times. Read the International Business Times article titled Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton’s State Department.
This all gets back to the POLITIFACT articles.
POLITIFACT states “The State Department did approve the Uranium One deal, but it didn’t act unilaterally.”
And… this is supposed to be a good thing?
The New York Times
states “The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium
producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much
of the global uranium supply chain.”
Vox recently called Trump a Russian stooge,
yet it was Clinton’s State Department that approved a deal bringing
“Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium
supply chain.”
President Obama’s administration approved a uranium deal that motivated Pravda to write “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”
If Putin is America’s great adversary, why did Clinton’s State Department and eight other agencies approve the deal?
Why didn’t President Obama veto the deal?
Why did Uranium One officials feel the need to donate millions to the Clinton Foundation amid the sale?
This
blind spot within American media is the reason Trump won the White
House. Clinton engages in an overt controversy, and the American press
focuses solely on the semantics within Trump’s accusation. With Clinton,
it’s never using a private server to hide information. Everything is
merely a coincidence, or there’s enough semantic leeway for plausible
deniability. Yoga emails were deleted, not Clinton Foundation emails.
As for the billions lost in Haiti linked to Bill and Hillary Clinton, Hatian-born journalist Daddy Cherry demands the Clintons “Return Haiti’s Earthquake Billions.”
Congratulations,
vigilant and daring American press, whose only goal is to defeat Trump.
You’ve again focused on Trump’s wild accusations, while ignoring the
giant elephant in the room.
Once
again, America is playing Trump’s game (fact checking based on
semantics, as opposed to the overall picture) and refusing to hold
Hillary Clinton accountable for a genuine conflict of interest. This
paved the way for Trump’s recent conflicts of interest.
Sure, Hillary Clinton didn’t “give up” 20% of U.S. uranium.
Trump is wrong about Clinton “giving” the uranium to Putin.
Also, it’s 20% of U.S. uranium capacity, that’s true.
There, feel better now DNC?
You
shouldn’t if you think Russia influenced the election and fear the
implications of General Flynn’s phone calls, or Trump’s contacts with
Russia.
I highlight the impact of the Obama administration’s uranium deal with Russia in the following segment on H. A. Goodman YouTube:
In
the McCarthy era atmosphere of today’s Democratic Party, what if Trump
approved the sale of 20% of U.S. uranium capacity to Russia, as his
foundation received millions?
For every fact-checking piece mocking Trump’s claims, simply reread the original NYT story. The New York Times explains the possible quid pro quo arrangement in a now legendary piece by Jo Becker and Mike McIntire titled Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal:
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
Again, would this be condoned if Trump’s foundation had accepted millions from uranium one?
Also,
why were Uranium One donations “not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,
despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the
Obama White House to publicly identify all donors”?
There’d be widespread calls for impeachment if this happened with Trump, and people would be right.
The Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars, as the Podesta Group lobbied on behalf of Uranium One.
Uranium One was already owned by the Kremlin, while the Podesta Group
was lobbying on behalf of Uranium One. The Obama administration sold
U.S. uranium to a company that was essentially owned by Putin.
The fact 9 agencies had to sign off on the deal
is irrelevant. If Clinton’s State Department, under Obama approved the
deal, this shows Hillary Clinton was never worried about Russian
aggression or influence.
Uranium
One officials felt the need to donate to Clinton’s Foundation during
the uranium deal, and that brings up the question of Clinton’s influence
on Obama’s administration.
Most importantly, the Clinton Foundation coincidentally shut down its Global Initiative, shortly after Clinton lost, and no longer accepts foreign donations.
Why did Bill and Hillary shut down the Clinton Global Initiative?
Could it be that the Clintons no longer have access to give to donors?
Or is it only Trump who has conflicts of interest?
The
Clinton Foundation did accept millions of dollars from Uranium One
during the sale, approved under Obama’s administration, while the Podesta Group lobbied on behalf of company owned by Russia. In addition, the Panama Papers
reveal Clinton’s ties to the Kremlin. Therefore, it’s a fact Clinton
and President Obama presided over the sale of 20% of U.S. uranium
capacity to Russia. If the fact Uranium One officials donated millions
amid the deal doesn’t bother you, then there’s a job waiting for you at
Vox.
H. A. Goodman is the creator of Counter Propa and the thoughts above are inspired by his new publication.
SEE ALSO......
From The Desk of Capt. Dave Bertrand (Ret.)
Int'l Airline Freight Captain on the DC-8 stretch jet / B-727
series 200 jet & First Officer DC-6 prop & DC-10 wide-body
jet), 72' to 76' U.S. Army Veteran (Military Police) 'Comms Sergeant'
(Korea), Law Enforcement (State), DHS Trained Counter-Terrorism
Instructor for HWW, Border Security Specialist, Political Analyst and Activist to help "Make America Great Again" while exposing the "Deep State" shadow government enemy.
My
mission is to slice through the propaganda, encourage everyone to
write and share important news among our network of patriots, military,
law enforcement and selected news media sources (we trust). We are the
pulse of America and we will prevail.
No comments:
Post a Comment