AG Sessions says he’ll punish sanctuaries, cities could lose billions of dollars
This is fantastic news but I am hoping that it will go just a tad bit further and enforce the law related to those who HARBOR, TRANSPORT, HIRE Illegals. Section 1324a states: "Any person who knowingly hires/harbors/transports any illegal alien is guilty of a felony punishable by 10 years jail + $2000 fine per illegal alien + forfeiture of the vehicle or property used to commit the crime".
I would love to see those governors, County Execs., Mayors (especially that SODOMITE in Seattle, Ed Murray), those school administrators, and all other politicians in positions to create the law violations in their jurisdictions. --- TEN (10) YEARS in Jail + $2,000.00 fine PER ILLEGAL. Soddy Ed Murray will be welcome new pet in Prison.
8 USC Sec. 1325 (ILLEGAL ENTRY)
8 USC Sec. 1324 (Hiring an ILLEGAL)
8 USC Sec. 1644 ("No local ordinance, rule, or measure shall stop law enforcement officers
8 USC Sec. 1325 Any alien who -
1. enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or
2. eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or
3. attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under Title 18 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under Title 18, or imprisoned not more than two years or both.
(b) Improper time or place, civil penalties - Any alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty of -
(1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or
(2) twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection. Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed.
(c) Marriage fraud - Any individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or fined not more than $250,000 or both.
(d) Immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud - Any individual who knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined in accordance with title 18, or both.
Section 1324a states: "Any person who knowingly hires/harbors/transports any illegal alien is guilty of a felony punishable by 10 years jail + $2000 fine per illegal alien + forfeiture of the vehicle or property used to commit the crime".
Section 1324c states, "All officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws shall have authority to make arrests for a violation of any provision of this section" (affirmed US v Perez-Gonzalez 2002 Fed App 0360, 6th Circ.).
Section 1644, same title states, "No local ordinance, rule, or measure shall stop law enforcement officers from enforcement of this section" (affirmed Southern District Court of NY, US v Rudy Guiliani,1996).
MUEHLER et al. v. MENA certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 03-1423.Argued December 8, 2004--Decided March 22, 2005
Jackie Juntti
WGEN idzrus@earthlink..net
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. GRG
[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/
http://www.washingtontimes.
AG Sessions says he’ll punish sanctuaries, cities could lose billions of dollars
![[]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/proxy/AVvXsEjUGeWkrjsF2DuEM9nlhZqgfOnI6xUWKluTv4Ol9Igm8GXcL3Adn_T8FYhVBW-dXfhHnOKHFSCpfvTOsYCPyhhgAHM5uskJiRf819AaUgpj7K2gLLeW_w5UQnpa4XbQ0t1ryCMQZ2BmDs721Tuoh7SH2-gx5aYItrFXmfEVw0jfMg-adX01=s0-d-e1-ft)
Jeff Sessions speaks out against sanctuary cities
Yahoo
View Comments Print
By Stephen Dinan and Dave Boyer - The Washington Times - Updated: 2:04 p.m. on Monday, March 27, 2017
Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Monday he’ll begin punishing sanctuary cities, withholding potentially billions of dollars in federal money and even clawing back funds that had been doled out in the past.
Speaking at the White House, Mr. Sessions said his department is preparing to dole out more than $4 billion in funds this year, but will try prevent any of it from going to sanctuaries.
“Countless Americans would be alive today … if these policies of sanctuary cities were ended,” Mr. Sessions said.
He said he’s carrying out a policy laid out by the Obama administration last year, which identified three grant programs the COPS grants, Byrne grants and State Criminal Alien Assistance Program money that already require sanctuary certification.
The Obama administration didn’t end up enforcing that policy, but Mr. Sessions said he’ll begin.
Sanctuaries are jurisdictions that thwart federal immigration agents’ efforts to deport illegal immigrants, usually be refusing to comply with detainer requests from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
More than 100 cities and counties were identified last week in ICE’s inaugural public name-and-shame list of sanctuaries.
Some of the sanctuaries refuse all communication with ICE, saying they want no part of helping deport anyone. But other jurisdictions say they’re concerned about the legal implications of holding someone for ICE agents, and say federal agents’ requests aren’t good enough.
On Friday ICE issued a new detainer form, replacing a jumble of forms that had emerged under the Obama administration. ICE’s new single form allows agents to demand notification when a potential deportee is about to be released from custody, and also asks that the target person he held for up to 48 hours so agents can get there to pick the person up.
The notification requirement is controversial with only a handful of the most strident sanctuaries, but the 48-hour hold is more problematic.
The National Sheriffs’ Association said it was looking for a clearer policy statement from Mr. Sessions.
“Until the Department of Justice issues legal guidance confirming the constitutionality of current detainers, sheriffs will remain exposed to legal and ethical ramifications,” Jonathan Thompson, executive director of the association, said last week.
Copyright © 2017 The Washington Times, LLC.
Click to Read More
No comments:
Post a Comment