I have a habit of calling boys “boy,” as in: “Boy, if you
don’t stop picking on your sister, I’m taking away your Xbox” or “Boy, if you
don’t start hustling, I’m pulling you out of the game.” Which resulted in a conundrum over the
weekend…
My 10-year-old son has a new black friend who went to the
UNLV basketball game with us Friday night.
And a situation arose where I used the term “boy” in a normal, completely
innocuous manner when I advised, “Boy, you better stand up if you expect to
catch one of those t-shirts the cheerleaders are throwing into the stands.”
Now, having been properly indoctrinated by professional
race-hustlers for many, many years, I immediately caught myself thinking I’d
broken a major taboo. You’re not
supposed to call a black boy “boy” even if he is, you know, a boy. If you do you’re a racist, right?
But then I thought about it this way…
If I DIDN’T call the boy “boy” in a situation where I’d
call any other boy “boy,” isn’t it inherently racist to treat the black boy
differently from every other boy simply because of his color?
Why, yes. I think it
would.
Am I wrong?
By the way, the boy didn’t seem to notice or care
whatsoever. He just stood up and tried
to catch a t-shirt. Maybe it’s because
he’s homeschooled by Air Force parents and hasn’t been caught up in the race-hustling
PC crap. Maybe there’s hope after all.
Cheers.
Dr. Chuck Muth, PsD
Professor of
Psephology (homeschooled)
Nevada’s #1 Irritator of Liberals and RINOs
P.S. Our Thanksgiving
weekend “Saga
of the Lost Dog” has thankfully come to a happy ending. The rescued dog’s owner - our former
babysitter, Nicole - picked up “Baby” yesterday after we had him micro-chipped,
vaccinated and tagged.
Baby still needs a professional haircut, but here’s a pic of
the happy Baby-Nicole reunion at our house last night…
NEWSMAX HEADLINES
- Dems Turn Ohio State Non-Shooting Into Gun-Control Debate
- MSNBC: Cuban-Americans 'Ashamed' of Obama Over Castro
- Trump: Cuba Must Agree to Changes or I Will Terminate Deal
- Ex-Rep. Diaz Balart: No Ambassador Until All Castros Gone
- Elian Gonzalez Returns to Public eye to Praise Castro
- Bodyguard: Castro Lived Lifestyle of Billionaire Playboy
- 'Morning Joe': Trump 'Furious' With Conway for Romney Complaints
- Rove: Conway's Slam on Romney Makes Trump 'Look Weak'
- Trump to Meet Petraeus as State Dept. Fight Continues
- Endangered Dems Willing to Work With Trump, GOP
- Report: Trump Has Approached Fox News Analyst for WH Job
- Priebus: Hillary Reneged on Concession 'Deal' With Trump
- John Fund: US Has 'Sloppiest' Elections; 'Massive Fraud' in NC
- General's Hawkish Border Views Could Land Him Cabinet Role
- Gingrich: Romney Pick Would 'Disappoint' Trump Supporters
- Trump Blasts Clinton Using Her Own Words on Twitter
- Fox News: Slain Ohio State Attacker Was Somali Man
- GOP Fighting Obama on Attempts to Push Through Climate Regulations
- Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters Told to Leave by Dec. 5
- Washington State Youth Sue Government Over Climate Change
- Rosie Defends Ugly, False Claim Trump's Son Autistic
- Free Beacon: Podesta Group Admits Undisclosed Foreign Govt Advocacy
- GAO Report: US Spends $1B on Public Relations Annually
QUICK HITS
* * * When Donald
Trump warned that the election was “rigged” against him, most of us on the
right understood exactly what he meant.
It wasn’t so much the notion that ballot boxes were being stuffed. It was the crooked, biased, coordinated shenanigans
on the left, especially by some in the media.
Like how the CEO of the online chat website Reddit admitted
last week that he “abused his power” by using his administrative powers “to
secretly edit user comments” on a pro-Trump forum to make it look like critical
comments directed at him on the forum were actually directed at the leaders of
the pro-Trump group.
That Trump was nevertheless able to win this “rigged” election
is still absolutely amazing.
* * * Over the weekend, President-elect Donald Trump
tweeted: “In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won
the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally.”
The left and many in the mainstream media (but I repeat
myself) came unglued, declaring in one voice that there was “no evidence” to
support Trump's claim.
Then again, there’s no evidence to refute it either, since
no one is required to produce a photo ID before voting. So we here at Muth’s Truths rule Trump’s
claim as: Possibly True. Now let’s pass
some voter ID laws, OK?
* * * When it comes to the Secretary of State slot in the
Trump administration, put me down as #NeverRomney. His anti-Trump actions and verbal assaults
almost gave us Crooked Hillary. You just
can’t forget or reward that.
Or as my friend and conservative icon Richard Viguerie put it, “it isn’t that Mitt Romney would get in the way of draining the swamp – it is that
he, and other establishment Republicans like him, ARE the swamp.” Read Richard’s full column on this subject by
clicking here
* * * In Ventura County, California, local judges have been
performing thousands of Saturday weddings on their days off for a highly
discounted fee of just $65 for the last 30 years. That comes to a screeching halt in January
when a new law - authored by some dumbass Democrat Assemblyman - goes into
effect banning even the nominal payments to the judges.
The couples were happy.
The judges were happy. And the
public interest of promoting marriage was being served. Why can’t liberals just leave people who are
happy and not bothering anyone else alone?
FAMOUS LAST WORDS
“There's a massive voter fraud investigation going on in North Carolina. … I think there's going to be a recount. There's probably going to be litigation in the courts. The people of North Carolina still don’t know who their governor is. … It's so sloppy you can't tell where the incompetence in an election system ends in some states and where the fraud might begin." – Election expert John Fund of National Review
No comments:
Post a Comment