Shooting cops across America: guidance from above
By Jon Rappoport
The
protests and the violence started as a response to what has been
happening in inner cities: the police killing innocent people. That was
the heavily promoted media and political narrative.
And cops-killing-innocent-black-people was framed as the biggest problem of inner cities.
Preposterous.
Cops shooting innocent people in inner cities does NOT describe the root of what's been going on in American ghettoes.
Loss
of manufacturing jobs, owing to Globalist trade treaties; gang crime;
drugs; poverty; absolute dependence on government for survival---now
you're talking about the roots of the devastation.
But that wasn't the preferred narrative.
So
instead, Black Lives Matter (BLM) and affiliated groups have received
special attention from above: the President, the US Attorney General,
George $oros, and so on.
The objective?
Among others, to present the entire picture of inner cities in America as: cops killing innocent people.
It's
a form of community organizing. Find an issue, any issue that ignites
the population of the target group, push it, inflame it, get people out
on the street, provoke violence.
End game? The
elite end game? Make gun ownership illegal. Install what amounts to a
national police force, where every community is ultimately run from the
federal level.
Does this do anything to improve life in inner cities?
Of course not. That was never the true goal.
All this guidance and funding from above for BLM and similar groups...it's not about making life better for anyone.
There
are untold numbers of inner-city residents, at this very moment, holed
up in their homes, who have been hoping for real solutions for decades.
And they know, as they watch the street protests and street violence
unfolding, day after day, that nothing good is going to come out of
this. They know. But nobody is listening to them.
They're
the silent majority. The people on streets (some of whom have been
bused in from other places) are the headline grabbers.
And
then put a few snipers and shooters into the mix, and you have an
irresistible media propaganda exploitation campaign. Otherwise known as
the news. And you have cops dying.
The landscape
of the Presidential season is a perfect backdrop. Hillary ("the healer")
vs. Trump ("he's to blame for everything").
Obama's
agenda in all this isn't difficult to spot. During his term in office,
he's continued to permit the federal government to militarize police
forces all over the country. Heavier weapons and equipment, fit for a
full-bore Army.
Why would he allow this, unless
he were aiming toward an escalation of conflict between citizens and
cops? And where would the conflict focus most fully? In inner cities.
And who would ultimately win? The police/army, of course.
Meanwhile, from his elevated position, he encourages BLM protests.
***He's playing both sides against the middle.
The
murders of police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge are lead-ups and
previews to the nominating conventions of both Parties. These murders
send a signal to those disposed toward violence: keep going.
The
federal government positions itself as the ultimate solver of the
problem, which is presented and ground down to skin color as the only
issue.
The government loves everyone, the
government cares, the government particularly cares about the underdog
and the victim, but the government is also outfitting police forces all
over America with wartime gear, so it can "wage peace."
This puts every police force in the country in the center of the storm---as both aggressor and target.
And behind and above those police forces, the government is saying:
"We
give and we take. We decide how it will go on any given day. Will we
declare sympathy for violent people in the streets, or will we crush
them? It's up to us. Stay inside and stay tuned. Keep the news on.
Vicariously experience the adrenaline surge of fight-or-flight. It's our
movie. We're producing it."
It's called mind control.
| 
No comments:
Post a Comment