WHY IMMIGRATION MUST BE LEGAL AND 'REFUGEES' CONSIDERED ILLEGAL
Almost every sentient human on the planet knows that when Muslims flood European countries, crime rates soar. Yet The Economist denies what we all know.
The first 2 articles on immigrant crime are mainstream. The third is a site that collects statistics on Muslims and crime. While one can claim that that one is clearly biased against Muslims, the statistics the cite come from mainstream press and official sources. Now just check these out and then check out the article in The Economist (see 4th link below) which absurdly states that the crime rate among immigrants is no higher than that among the general population of European countries.
The Western elites are clearly up to something, lying, obfuscating, white washing Muslim immigrants, all to protect elitist government officials like Angela Merkel, whose refugee asylum policies have thrown Germany into turmoil, damaged her own party and drawn fire from all over Europe, where this madwoman has demanded that refugee quotas be imposed on all EU countries.
I decided to compile these articles because some of my friends actually subscribe to and read the Economist, apparently unaware of its extremely biased reporting. People who still take The Economist seriously apparently suffer from a terminal case of normalcy bias. I suppose they think that the rag is written by experts on economic matters. No doubt the writers have knowledge, but knowledge with bias is worth less than nothing. For example, The Economist constantly writes biased articles on Russia based on hearsay and the usual Neocon myths. They focus on alleged but unproven accusations against Putin but never mention the egregious behavior of our “ally” Erdogan, who, among other things, turns a blind eye to the rampant trafficking of stolen Syrian oil, a business that funds ISIS, even as he pretends to fight ISIS. This compilation clearly shows that The Economist is nothing but a mouthpiece for the elitists.
1 --http://www.spectator.co.uk/
2- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/
3--https://muslimstatistics.
The out-of-touch Economist article is shown below with a commentary from our UK friend G.
http://www.economist.com/news/
From
The Economist, 19th January.
This
is a criminal and suicidal level of stupidity. If it weren’t so
dangerous, it would be amusing to watch the right-on trying to square the
circle of accommodating feminists, poofs and homosexuals with Islam and other
barbarian cultures.
G.
“Migrants are no more likely to commit crimes than natives.”
FOUR months ago, the body of three-year-old Aylan Kurdi
washed up on a beach in Turkey after he, his brother and his mother drowned
while trying to reach Greece. A photograph of Aylan quickly became the defining
image of the masses of refugees fleeing Syria’s civil war. The picture helped
cement a brief consensus that the Middle Eastern migrants risking death to get
to Europe should be allowed in to apply for asylum. Angela Merkel, Germany’s
chancellor, announced that her country would accept asylum applications from
any Syrians who reached its borders. Much of Europe seemed on the verge of
joining the project.
But Europe never joined. The task of absorbing the
migrants has been left to Germany and Sweden, with a bit of help from the
Netherlands and a few other countries. German and Swedish eagerness to welcome
so many refugees has gradually been worn down. Now the events of New Year’s Eve
in Cologne and other German cities may have buried it for good.
That night, gangs of young men, mainly asylum-seekers,
formed rings around women outside Cologne station and then robbed and sexually
assaulted them. More than 600 women reported to the police that they had been
victimised. After Cologne, when Europeans think of refugees, many no longer
picture persecuted families or toddlers. Instead they see menacing young men
imbued with the sexism that is all too common across the Middle East and north
Africa.
Sex and the citadel
Such fears, though overblown, are not absurd, and will
not be allayed by pointing out that the alleged attackers in Cologne so far
identified are mostly Moroccan or Algerian, not Syrian. There really is a
cultural gulf between rich, liberal, secular Europe and some of the countries
from which recent migrants come. It is impossible to conduct surveys in Syria
right now, for obvious reasons, but a 2013 Pew poll of Muslims around the world
makes sobering reading. More than 90% of Tunisians and Moroccans believe that a
wife should always obey her husband. Only 14% of Iraqi Muslims and 22% of
Jordanians think a woman should be allowed to initiate a divorce. And
although Arab societies take a harsh view of sex crimes, women who venture
alone and in skimpy clothing into a public space in, say, Egypt can expect a
barrage of male harassment.
Migrants are no more likely to commit crimes than
natives. [THIS IS UNBELEIVABLE. FIRST THE
AUTHOR ADMITS THAT MUSLIMS MEN DO HARASS WOMEN MORE BUT NOW HE SAYS NATIVES DO
THIS AT THE SAME RATE. SO LIBERAL SOCIETIES HAVE ALWAYS BEEN DANGEROUS FOR
WOMEN BUT WE NEVER REALIZED IT UNTIL MEN WHO JUST HAPPENED TO BE MUSLIMS
HARRASSED THEM IN COLOGNE! FRIEND, IF YOU ARE SUBSCRIBING TO THE ECONOMIST, YOU
ARE WILLINGLY PAYING TO BE LIED TO--DON] But
it would be otherworldly to pretend that there is no tension between the
attitudes of some and their hosts [SO WHAT
HAPPENED IN COLOGNE WAS AN ATTITUDE, NOT A CRIME? DON]. European women cherish their rights to wear what they
like, go where they like and have sex or not have sex with whom they please. No
one should be allowed to infringe these freedoms.
However, it does not follow from this that Germany was
wrong to offer a haven to Syrian refugees. [I
BEG YOUR PARDON. IF THESE REFUGEES ARE FLEEING TERROR, AS THEY REPORTEDLY ARE,
THEN ALL THE MEN AMONG THEM, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, MUST BE SENT BACK TO JOIN THE
ONLY ARMY THAT IS FIGHTING TERROR IN SYRIA. THAT WOULD BE ASSAD’S ARMY. THE
SAME PEOPLE WHO LIE ABOUT REFUGEES AND CRIME ARE ALSO LYING WHEN THEY SAY THESE
PEOPLE NEED TO STAY IN EUROPE. NO, THEY DO NOT. THEY NEED TO GO HOME AND FIGHT
TERROR AND EUROPE NEEDS TO SUPPORT THEM IN THAT FIGHT. IF THEY ARE FLEEING
ASSAD AND THE RUSSIANS, THEY ARE ISIS SYMPATHIZERS, LIKE MOST WESTERN LEADERS. AND
IF THEY SYMPATHIZE WITH ISIS, THEN THEY HAVE NO PLACE IN EUROPE. DON] The moral imperative has not changed since Aylan washed
up on that beach. Half of Syria’s cities have been blasted to rubble, hundreds
of thousands of people lie dead and tens of thousands are starving in towns
under siege. Thousands more refugees arrive in Greece every week. Those who
would shut them out must explain where they should go instead. [BACK HOME TO
FIGHT ISIS]
Rather than succumbing to moral panic, Europe needs to
work out how to manage the flow of refugees and help them assimilate. A good
place to start would be to insist that they obey the law. Police in Cologne
clearly failed to take on the harassers. Perhaps they did not recognise what
was going on quickly enough, or were afraid of being accused of racism. Or it
may have been simple incompetence. Women have complained for years that German
police are slow to stop sexual harassment in the drunken crowds at the Munich
Oktoberfest. [WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE OF THIS?]
Whatever the precise nature of the failure, it needs to
be fixed. Security cameras in public places would make it easier to convict
those who hide in crowds—Germans should overcome their queasiness about such
surveillance. With luck, the police will learn from their mistakes and work out
how to prevent such incidents. Molesters should be punished. Asylum-seekers who
flout the law should face prison or deportation. No one can be sent back to
Syria, but Mrs Merkel is right to argue that Morocco and Algeria are safe
enough (see page 33).
Work and family
When it comes to assimilating new arrivals, Europe could
learn a thing or two from America, which has a better record in this regard. It
is not “culturally imperialist” to teach migrants that they must respect both
the law and local norms such as tolerance and sexual equality. And it is
essential to make it as easy as possible for them to work. This serves an
economic purpose: young foreign workers more than pay their way and can help
solve the problem of an ageing Europe. It also serves a cultural one:
immigrants who work assimilate far more quickly than those who are forced to sit
around in ghettos. In the long run most children of migrants will adopt core
European values, but the short run matters too.
Migrants who take the most hazardous routes into Europe,
for example by crossing the Mediterranean in leaky boats, are disproportionately
young men (see page 34). Overall they make little difference to Europe’s sex
ratio, but in some areas and age brackets they may skew it. This is a
problem—districts with more young single men than women are more prone to
violence, especially if those men are jobless. That is why it is daft to
restrict the ability of refugees to bring their spouses and other family
members to join them, as Denmark’s government is now doing.
The process of absorbing refugees will be neither quick
nor easy, but it is the right thing to do and will ultimately benefit Europe.
Ideally, all European countries would do their part. It is scandalous that so
few have agreed to take more than a handful of Syrians, and that European
governments have yet to agree on a beefed-up border agency to police the EU’s
external frontiers. Even in Germany, there is a risk that Mrs Merkel will be
forced to abandon her policy of compassion [SUBTLE LIE HERE: IT IS NOT
COMPASSION TO SUBJECT ONE’S COUNTRYMEN TO THIS SAVAGERY]. If she is to salvage
it, she must take the lead again, spelling out how Germans can make Willkommenskultur work—
No comments:
Post a Comment