TRUMP HAD IT RIGHT AND RUBIO WAS WRONG!

Submitted by: John Porter

Banning immigrants is not unconstitutional. Most all Constitutional Attorneys and Law Scholars agree.
Please read and share this truth to the rest of the nation. We all need to get involved. It's our country.
Thank you.......John Porter

One of the main criticisms of Donald Trump’s proposed moratorium on 
Muslim immigration is that it’s unconstitutional. For example, 
Republican presidential candidate and law graduate Marco Rubio said that 
the plan “violates the Constitution” earlier this week.

However, two notable law professors — Jan C. Ting of Temple University 
and Eric Posner of the University of Chicago — say those critics are 
wrong and possibly don’t know much about legal history.

Ting, a professor at Temple University’s School of Law and a former 
Immigration and Naturalization Services commissioner for the Department 
of Justice, explained to The Daily Caller that Trump’s plan is in 
keeping with over a hundred years of legal precedent.

“No kind of immigration restriction is unconstitutional,” Ting told The 
Dc. “The U.S. government can exclude a foreign national on any basis.”

The legal scholar explained that the Supreme Court’s decisions since 
ruling unanimously in favor of the legality of the Chinese Exclusion Act 
in 1889 have upheld the authority of the political branches — executive 
and legislative — to make immigration law as they see fit and to exclude 
foreigners on grounds that would not be applicable to American citizens.

“The statutes are clear: immigration is different from all other aspects 
of the law,” Ting said. “The Supreme Court has ruled we can enact laws 
against foreign nationals that would not be permissible to apply to 
citizens. The courts historically have no role in these decisions.”

Until next time;
John Porter