Clearly, Americans are
severely brainwashed, not only by the Obama administration but also by the
Neocons, many of whom use the sinister method proposed by the Leo Strauss and
Irving Kristol, namely, dragging gullible Christians into their web of
subterfuge and lies, creating the perfect conditions for eternal war. The
latest "stop Iran" craze is part of this dirty strategy because it
distracts our attention away from Saudi-sponsored ISIS, the most dangerous
enemy we have ever had. It is working, thanks to gullible
"conservatives." (The article linked here is vital to your
understanding of the sneaky tricks of the Neocons: http://laiglesforum. com/the-framing-of-iran-by- the-godless/3443.htm).
Just remember:
A favorite Neocon
trick is to float the notion that all Muslims are equal, or equally evil. This
enables them to overcome any misgivings we might have about launching another
of the government's endless aerial attacks against whatever Muslim country is
our next victim.
The two main branches
of Islam are Shiite and Sunni.
By far the most
dangerous is Sunni. The Saudis are Sunnis. Worse, they belong to the Wahhabi
sect of Sunni, and that is by far the most dangerous religious sect in the
world. Their aim is to kill or convert every Christian or other religious
adherent.
Iran is Shiite, and
while this branch also strictly adheres to Sharia law and carries out drastic
punishments on mainly Muslims who violate the law, they permit Christian
worship within their country. There are 600 churches in Iran. As for Syria, its
government is run by a secularist, Bashar el Assad, the most vital asset Syrian
Christians and other minorities have. Of course he's not perfect. No one is.
But taking him out would be insane.
Thus, the Saudis and
their powerful Western allies are opposed to 2 kinds of leaders in the Middle
East:
Non-Muslims, eg,
Christians, of which there are none, and
Secularists, who
protect Christians and other minorities. Ghadaffi was to secularist for the
Saudis and he therefore had to be taken out. So was Saddam, although he also
had other issues, regrettably.
As for Obama, he was
wrong to accept any deal with Iran without them first releasing a jailed
American, but it is wrong to treat Iran more harshly than Saudi Arabia. (Iran
may soon have bomb material but so may the Saudis, who have signed 6 nuclear
contracts with Russia. Equally ominously, they are to receive shipments of
Iskander missiles. Unlike the defensive missiles to be sent to Iran, the
Iskander is a ballistic, nuclear-capable missile. And now the sponsors of ISIS
have these potential weapons of mass destruction! Yet there is no group of
politician in America who declares "stop the Saudis." All we hear
constantly is "stop Iran," the country with 600 Christian churches,
vs Saudi Arabia's zero. Can you seriously look me in the eye and tell me this
is as it should be?
Obama, and all other
US presidents so far, have given the Saudis a pass. The EU, following the US's
lead, does likewise.
Both Jean-Claude
Juncker, the top EU commissioner, and Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor,
have railed against, and threatened with punishment, all European nations and
individuals who balk at their suicidal plans to resettle unlimited numbers of
Muslim immigrants in Europe, BUT neither has complained that the Saudis, who
sponsor ISIS and are therefore chiefly responsible for the unprecedented
immigration wave, refuses to accommodate a single Syrian or Iraqi refugee.
Yet Saudi Arabia is
the ideal place for their fellow Muslims, who speak their language.
Obviously, there is an
agenda behind this open borders and unlimited immigration policy and I am
absolutely certain the main goal for the elites is to eliminate Christianity in
Europe and the US.
Just after I wrote
that I received a report
that the Saudis, who refused to take any of the Muslims from Syria, have
offered to build 200 mosques in Germany.
That is what this immigration wave is all about.
The US and NATO caused
it by killing Ghadaffi and Saddam and by wholeheartedly supporting the Arab
Spring. Yet when it comes to fighting ISIS, oh no, that would be a violation of
international law. Ha!
Western world, thy
name is hypocrisy
No comments:
Post a Comment