GOP Excuses for
Sentencing Kids to 100 Days in Public School are Total B.S.
Chuck
Muth
September
3, 2015
It
is impossible to overstate just how badly the Republican-controlled Nevada Legislature
and our Republican governor screwed up the most exciting and promising school
choice program in the galaxy.
The
fly-the-size-of-a-cow in the ointment continues to be the absurd and
discriminatory requirement for parents of private school and home school
students to force their children into a government-owned/union- managed/bureaucrat-run
public school for 100 days to qualify for an Education Savings Account (ESA).
My
wife and I are among the home school parents in Nevada who bit the bullet and
very reluctantly enrolled our kids in the public school system for this
semester. What a nightmare. My kids hate it. My wife hates it.
And
they’re not too fond of me right now either!
The
biggest problem – and the reason we chose to home school in the first place –
is that our kids are now being forced to learn what the government has decided
they should learn rather than what we, as parents, want them to learn or the
kids themselves want to learn.
For
example, my one daughter is being required to read “The Life of Frederick
Douglas,” while I would prefer she read David McCullough’s “John Adams” or “1776”
and she would prefer to read “The Encyclopedia of Horses and Ponies.”
Reading
is reading. Learning is learning.
Why
is the government’s one-size-fits all curriculum and mandated reading list
deemed the only one acceptable for all children? That’s as ridiculous as it is wrong, and at
the heart of why so many of our public schools are considered “failure
factories” and why more money will never be able to fix them.
But
back to this whole 100-day prison sentence private school and home school kids have
been penalized with. The overriding
question: Why?
One
of the lame excuses being bandied about by some GOP legislators is that it was
necessary to get the votes needed to pass the bill. But that’s total B.S.
Republicans
had control of both the Senate and the Assembly and didn’t need, or get, a single
Democrat vote to pass SB 302. So why
penalize children to appease Democrats who weren’t going to vote for the bill
anyway? Duh.
The
second excuse is that without the 100-day requirement the new ESA program would
have “blown a hole” in the budget. But if
so, legislators must have been using public school math!
The
fact is private schoolers and home schoolers have been costing the government
NOTHING in the education budget. Parents
have been picking up the tab. But by
forcing those kids into a public school this semester to qualify for an ESA,
now they ARE costing the government money it otherwise wouldn’t have been
spending. Duh.
And
does anyone really believe that providing ESAs for four semesters instead of
three during the two-year budget cycle would have “blown a hole” in the budget
that couldn’t have been covered by either reprioritizing other education
spending or funding them with money from the obscene $1.4 billion tax hike that
Gov. Sandoval shoved down our throats?
That
said, let’s accept the false argument that the only way to afford the new ESA
program was to allow it for the last three semesters instead of all four. OK, fine.
In
that case, then why, oh why, incur the additional per-pupil costs by forcing
private and home school kids into a public school for the first semester of the
budget cycle instead of simply saying you can’t open and start an ESA until the
second semester of the budget cycle? Duh.
The
public excuses being put forward by GOP legislators who blew this golden
opportunity (as usual) by needlessly forcing private school and home school
kids into a public school for 100 days are total B.S. If Gov. Sandoval really cared about children
and education, like he claims, he’d call a special session tomorrow to repeal
this discriminatory and outrageous 100-day penalty.
Alas,
our governor’s initials aren’t B.S. for nothing.
(Mr.
Muth is president of CitizenOutreach.com
and the publisher of www.NevadaNewsandViews.com. You can reach him at ChuckMuth.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment