"The Tenth Amendment is the foundation of the Constitution." - Thomas Jefferson
"Posterity,
you will never know how much it cost the present generation to preserve
your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I
shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to preserve it." - John Adams
"Power
concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.
Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the
exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and
these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows,
or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of
those whom they oppress." — Frederick Douglass
- Home
- Blog
- News
- Agenda
21: Multiple States Passing Laws To Protect Property Rights, But Few
Americans Are Even Aware Of The Mounting Threat Against Them
Agenda
21: Multiple States Passing Laws To Protect Property Rights, But Few
Americans Are Even Aware Of The Mounting Threat Against Them
Agenda
21 has attracted the attention of lawmakers across the country,
finally, - but the masses in America are still virtually unaware of the
potential threat to property rights and states rights posed by the
biodiversity plan.
A
detailed map of America created by the United Nations Convention on
Biological Diversity shows exactly what the country would look like if
the United Nations Agenda 21 plan takes hold in the United States. The Bundy ranch and Tommy Henderson Texas ranch battles with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
caused some to grow more concerned about the amount of land already
owned by the federal government and a perceived push to utilize
environmental laws to pressure residents away from rural growing and
grazing areas.
The United Nations Agenda 21
biodiversity plan is a voluntary and non-binding resolution is
reportedly focused only solely on sustainable development. A total of
178 United Nations countries adopted the Agenda 21 plan in 1992. The
global initiative is based upon a program which would in theory abolish
poverty and protect “fragile environments” by properly managing cities.
The
United States is a signatory country to Agenda 21. Congressional
approval was not required to become a signatory since the plan is
non-binding. In America alone, more than 500 large and moderate-sized
cities are members of an international sustainability organization that
reportedly supports the implementation of Agenda 21.
Rosa
Koire is likely one of the most outspoken opponents of Agenda 21. She
first became aware and concerned about the “communitarianism” or regionalist movement
while working as a real estate appraiser. Koire retired at a fairly
young age at least in part, to tour the country and educate others about
what she wholeheartedly seems to view as a dangerous and liberty
infringing movement which surpasses partisan politics.
“It
is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the
government will do a better job if they are in control. Individual
rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as
determined by the governing body. The plan is to restrict your choices,
limit your funds, narrow your freedoms and take away your voice,” Koire
said.
Texas
is the latest state to take officials action to thwart any attempt to
curtail the property rights of any citizen and to formally tout states
rights when exerting its power to halt any potential action initiated
under the guise of the UN resolution.
Texas
Agenda 21 legislation is now being debated by lawmakers in the Lone
Star State. The anti-Agenda 21 bill follows in the footsteps of similar
proposals currently being debated in a host of states around the United
States.
Excerpt from the Texas Agenda 21 bill:
“A
governmental entity may not enter into an agreement or contract with,
accept money from, orgrant money or other financial aid, to a
non-governmental or intergovernmental organization accredited by the
United Nations to implement a policy that originated in the Agenda 21
plan adopted by members of the United Nations at the United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development in June, 1992.”
Agenda 21 bills are also currently pending or have been passed in Tennessee, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Missouri, and Iowa. A resolution intended to outlaw the United Nations Agenda 21 biodiversity and sustainability plan in Montana was recently voted down.
The Montana Agenda 21
bill was sponsored by Sun River Republican Randy Pinocci. House Bill
583 failed by just a slight margin with a vote of 59 to 41.
Representative Pinocci reportedly feels that the anti-Agenda 21 bill
would have protected Montana residents’ property rights while rejecting the United Nations sustainable development initiative.
Those
who voted in opposition to the Agenda 21 bill in Montana largely felt
that the U.N. sustainable development plan is merely a “list of
recommendations regarding smart growth” and added that no citizens have
yet come forward to complain that the plan has been pushed upon them or
caused them problems at the local level.
Oklahoma House of Representatives
members voted overwhelmingly to support a similar anti-Agenda 21 bill.
The Oklahoma Community Protection Act, if passed by the full state
legislative body, would nullify any Agenda 21 “attacks” on property
rights in the state. The HB 2807 bill has now moved on to the Oklahoma
Senate for review.
A similar Agenda 21 bill pending in Missouri
would prevent any political subdivision from passing or implementing
policy recommendations that “deliberately or inadvertently infringe or
restrict private property rights” without due process.
Iowa’s first female Senator, Joni Ernst, had this to say about the United Nations Agenda 21 plan while on the campaign trail.
“The
United Nations has imposed this upon us, and as a U.S. Senator, I would
say no more. No more Agenda 21. All of us agreed that Agenda 21 is a
horrible idea, and I’m sure most of you have followed that. One of the
implications to Americans, again, going back to what did it do to the
individual family here in the state of Iowa, and what I’ve seen, the
implications that it has here is moving people off of their agricultural
land and consolidating them into city sectors and then telling them,
‘You don’t have property rights anymore. These are all things that the
UN is behind, and it’s bad for the United States, it’s bad for families
here in the state of Iowa.”
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) report entitled,
“Agenda 21: The U.N., Sustainability and Right-Wing Conspiracy Theory”
contends that support and action on the initiative has slowed down
across the country because grassroots activists have embarked on a
campaign to thwart Agenda 21 nationwide.
An excerpt from the SPLC Agenda 21 report reads:
“At
least three states — Arizona, Missouri and Oklahoma — have considered
laws, each of which passed one chamber of their legislatures, to halt
the purportedly noxious effects of Agenda 21; Alabama went all the way,
passing a 2012 law that was signed by Gov. Robert Bentley,” the report
states. “Major political battles have broken out over it in Georgia,
Illinois, Maryland, Montana, Ohio and Texas. Even the Republican
National Committee, in January 2012, denounced Agenda 21 as a
destructive and insidious scheme to impose a socialist/communist
redistribution of wealth.”
Author Stanley Kurtz wrote Spreading The Wealth: How Obama is Robbing the Suburbs to Pay for the Cities. Kurtz believes that President Obama has plans to abolish the suburbs and “Manhattanize” America.
While
Agenda 21 is reportedly a sustainable communities initiative, some on
both sides of the issue also view the plan as a race equity or social
justice matter. Stanley Kurtz’s investigation into the Agenda 21 type
push for biodiversity and sustainability led to the discovery of alleged
connections between President Barack Obama and key regionalist movement
advocates.
President
Obama was reportedly mentored by “pioneers” in the regionalist
movement. The author claims that the president’s past associates in the
regionalist movement are pushing him to put conditions on future federal
aid projects that adhere to regional planning commission’s
recommendations based upon the dictates of the Sustainable Communities Initiative.
During
the Obama administration, the White House has allegedly “lent its
prestige and facilities” to Building One America. The group is headed by
Mike Kruglik. He was reportedly one of the “bosses” of then community
organizer Obama. Greg Galluzzo and Jerry Kellman, the other two
supervisors of Barack Obama during that era, are also touted
high-profile regionalists. The three men are credited with establishing
the Gamaliel Foundation, which has been deemed the most influential
voice behind the regionalist equity movement.
When
Kruglik was at the White House for the Building One America conference,
he reportedly met with Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and senior
Obama adviser Peter Rouse. Valerie Jarrett was also supposedly slated to
attend but was pulled away for debt ceiling discussions. The Building
One America conference was convened by the invitation of the White
House, according to Kurtz. President Obama and Mike Kruglik were
photographed together later inside the Oval Office.
Whether
or not President Obama has any connection to, or shares a belief with,
the leaders of the regionalist movement, the potential threat to
property rights posed by the mandates in the Agenda 21 plan are worthy
of further investigation - and a watchful eye by all of America.
About the Author:
Tara
Dodrill is the author of Power Grid Down: How To Prepare, Survive &
Thrive After The Lights Go Out, The Prepared Family website creator,
and a writer for Off The Grid News, Prepper and Shooter Magazine,
Survival Life, Survival Based, and the host of the Common Sense Prepping
radio show on t ...
Categories:
Tags:
No comments:
Post a Comment