Debunking the Biggest
Myth in Nevada
Chuck
Muth
February 5, 2015
So
there’s Big Foot. The Loch Ness
Monster. Leprechauns. Mermaids.
And, of course, the Space Aliens being hidden at the top secret Area 51
military complex in Nevada’s outback.
But
none of those even come close to the biggest myth in Nevada: The “Underfunding
Education” creature!
Indeed,
Gov. Brian Sandoval’s entire $1.3 billion tax hike is being sold on the basis
of this myth that Nevada citizens are not paying enough for public education. And the governor is so good at spinning this
yarn – originally invented by the teachers’ union – that lots of people in
Nevada have bought into it.
The
Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce. The
Retail Association of Nevada. Even some
Republican state legislators who should know better.
Fortunately,
I happen to know an expert myth-buster by the name of Victor Joecks over at the
Nevada Policy Research Institute. And Mr.
Joecks has uncovered evidence that Nevada taxpayers are actually OVER-spending
on public education.
Indeed,
according to figures compiled by the Legislative Counsel Bureau last October,
Nevada taxpayers spent $8,781 per student in 2011, the last year figures were
available. And thanks to grants and
additional federal assistance for our worst-performing schools, that amount is
probably closer to $15,000 per student in many schools.
So
let’s do a little math, shall we? Class,
take out your #2 pencils…
OK,
let’s say there are 30 kids in a given Nevada classroom – about the average
size when I was a kid before all the whining and bellyaching about “class size
reduction.”
And
since most of us went to a public school long ago, let’s make this math problem
a little easier by rounding off the per-student figure to $9,000. So 30 times
9,000 equals…
That
means Nevada taxpayers are providing, at a minimum, a whopping $270,000 per
year to educate those 30 kids. And in
some low-income and minority communities, that figure is probably closer to
almost a HALF MILLION dollars.
For
ONE classroom!
Now,
most teachers are seriously underpaid. I
don’t know the exact starting salary, but let’s say it’s $50,000 per year. That means you could DOUBLE the teacher’s pay
to six figures and STILL have another $170,000+ to spend in the classroom to teach
Johnny to read, write and do arithmetic.
It’s
simple math. The problem isn’t that
we’re Underfunding Education. The
problem is we’re overfunding the education bureaucracy.
Alas,
despite the fact that no actual proof exists that the “Underfunding Education”
creature exists, some naïve people, especially our governor, believe this myth
with every bit as much conviction as some people believe in Big Foot.
At
least you and I don’t have to pay for people’s belief in Big Foot. But when it comes to funding public education…
You can read this column online, as well as access archives
of past Muth's Truths columns by clicking here... www.MuthsTruths.com |
Thursday, February 5, 2015
MUTH'S TRUTHS 02/05/2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment