 |
ARTICLE: Paedophile Politicians Are Above The Law says EU!by Watt Tyler |
By Ben Fellows of Before
it is News
Also by Ben Fellows: (2012)
Conservative M.P. Ken Clarke -”GROPED MY PENIS WITH HIS
HAND…[THINKING] I WAS FIFTEEN AT THE TIME”
The question that I’ve been asking is, how can
politicians be above the law? Well according to the European Union,
all politicians of member states have immunity against prosecution
for all criminal and civil offenses with the exception of hate crimes
and parking offenses, which beggars belief!
Article 28 of the Treaty of 8 April 1965 establishing
a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities
(the merger treaty) lays down that the European Communities shall
enjoy in the territories of the Member States such privileges and
immunities as are necessary for the performance of their tasks, under
the conditions laid down in the protocol annexed to that treaty.
Articles 9 and 10 says…
Article 9
Members of the European Parliament shall not be
subject to any form of inquiry, detention or
legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or
votes cast by them in the performance
of their duties.
‘Article 10
During the sessions of the European Parliament its
Members shall enjoy:
(a) in the territory of their own
State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament;
(b) in the territory of any other Member
State, immunity from any measure of
detention and from legal proceedings.
(c) Immunity shall likewise apply to
Members while they are travelling to and from the place of meeting of
the European Parliament.
(d) Immunity cannot be claimed when a
Member is found in the act of committing an offence and shall not
prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive
the immunity of one of its Members.’
“UK POLITICIANS ARE IMMUNE FROM QUESTIONING OR PROSECTION”
So the only time a politician isn’t immune is when
they are caught in the act of committing an offense. So if the Cook Report
Tapes ever show up then perhaps Ken Clarke could be prosecuted for
sexually assaulting me as he would have been filmed in the act of
committing a crime. Unfortunately, the lawyers protecting these
politicians have placed a time limit on even making a complaint, so
Ken Clarke could escape questioning on those grounds if the tapes
were found and made public. Effectively, the UK parliament and
European Union have given members of parliments a license to get away
with murder, literally. In general, this form of immunity is such
that, unless the British Parliament or the EU gives its
authorization, no member may be arrested or prosecuted for acts not
carried out in the performance of their duties.
Of course unless politicians are filmed and recorded
twenty four seven then there is no hope of bringing any prosecutions
against any politicians within the European Union super state, which
is why politicians get caught for minor offenses like parking
offenses, speeding offenses or hate crimes. There have been the
occasions whereby investigative journalists in recent months have
filmed politicians and caught them in yet more “Cash for Questions”
scandals but we can’t rely on mainstream media journalists all the
time.
So why are Politicians Immune from Prosecution? Well
to find out lets look back into the history of the parliamentary
system.
In ancient Rome, the tribunes of the people enjoyed
special protection in order that they should freely exercise their
functions. Anyone who infringed that prohibition was liable to
punishment and could even be executed.
Today’s right to immunity is based on the same basic
idea, although, fortunatly for me, it does not incur the same
penalty! The representatives of the people must enjoy certain
guarantees to underline the importance of their office, but more
importantly to give them the peace of mind they need to implement
their mandate.
The origins of parliamentary immunity date back to a
session of the English Parliament in 1397, when the House of Commons
passed a bill denouncing the scandalous financial behavior of King
Richard II of England. Thomas Haxey, the member who was behind this
direct act against the King and his court, was put on trial and
sentenced to death for treason. Following pressure applied by the
Commons, however, the sentence was not carried out, and Haxey
received a royal pardon.
This event prompted the House of Commons to review the
right of members of parliament to discuss and debate in complete
autonomy and freedom, without interference from the Crown. Freedom of
speech, introduced into the House of Commons at the beginning of the
sixteenth century was confirmed in the 1689 Bill of Rights, which
expressly protected discussions and acts of Members of Parliament
from any form of interference or objection from outside of
Parliament.
ALL POLITICIANS HAVE IMMUNITY, EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE RETIRED!
Unlike inviolability, non-liability has an absolute
quality, reflected in particular in the duration of its effects: the
protection afforded is maintained even after the member’s mandate has
come to an end. In other words all politicians have immunity even
when they are no longer politicians and have retired. However, whilst
there may well have been very good reasons to safe guard parliament
from the interference of the crown. Its clear that these privillages
are being abused along with the nations children.
When it comes to Paedophilia, child abuse and sexually motivated crimes should politicians still have the right to immunity?
After all how is abusing children part of their
Parliamentary mandate? I have never voted for any politician to abuse
children. It’s clear that after the Jimmy Savile case it appears that
he had immunity from prosecution along with other powerful
Paedophiles and child abusing celebrities. The Daily Star Sunday
tells of police being told “Stop investigating if you want to keep
your jobs” when investigating an alleged paedophile ring at the heart
of Margaret Thatcher’s government. A teenage rent boy had alleged
that a cabinet minister at the time, who is still alive, had abused
him. He also named judges and civil servants. We now know that they
were then and will always be, immune from any form of prosecution or
questioning by the authorities.
I was informed by the Metropolitan Police that there
were protocols in place that meant politicians are above the law and
cannot be questioned. I guess they were referring to these EU rules
which now govern us all.
Shouldn’t the public be informed of these EU rules?
Where is the report on the BBC and other mainstream news outlets
informing the public of the EU’s rules. Perhaps the BBC executives
and board members are also immune from prosecution like all the other
Paedophiles in the country it seems. Perhaps it’s time to change the
EU and UK rules on paedophiles operating in and around Westminister.
However, if you think that it’s just the Politicians who are immune
from prosecution then think again. These privillages also apply to
civil servants, their assistants, witnesses, experts and anyone who
is involved in the meetings including private individuals in business
.
Isn’t it time for politicians to stop being immune
against prosecution in regards to child abuse or will we allow these
paedophile politicians to continue to abuse parliamentary rules and
our children? Not being immune from prosecution may not stop
paedophilies but it will mean that “we the people” can have them
arrested and prosecuted when witnesses are brave enough to come
forward.
No comments:
Post a Comment