Submitted by: Suzanne
The Dick Act of 1902 also known as
the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all
so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and
separate entities.
The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized
militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and
District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army.
The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the
ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute
personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and
as many as they can afford to buy.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would
violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another
gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
The President of the United States has zero authority
without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside
of their State borders.
The National Guard Militia can only be required by the
National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to
uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion).
These are the only purposes for which the General Government
can call upon the National Guard.
Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft,
"the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for
offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States."
The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on
Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in
ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe
was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been
impeached.
During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress
to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages
of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada.
The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the
precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize
it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them
out of the country.
The fact is that the President has no constitutional right,
under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the
borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states.
Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in
waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath
to uphold.
Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a
speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House,
September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states:
"The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of
the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States." In these
pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, "that the great
principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the
militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia
of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care
and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power
of Congress over it."
"This limitation upon the power to raise and support
armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the
Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary
enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended
to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the
use of money for that purpose.
Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to
be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the
bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the
limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article,
certainly some restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain
the unlimited use of such power."
The Honorable William Gordon
Congressional Record, House, Page 640 – 1917
Source: http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node%2F3949
DICK ACT of 1902... CAN'T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL
FORBIDDEN) - Protection Against Tyrannical Govern
www.knowthelies.com
The Dick Act of 1902
also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902
invalidates all so-called gun-control laws.
It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate
entities.
Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, June 28, 1902.
Congressional Record, House, pages 7706-7713 and 321-353, 7594-7595. Also known
as the Dick Act of 1902, written by Representative Dick, passed by Congress on June
30, 1902.
The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized
militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and
District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia
encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members
of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment
right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.
The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate
bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross
violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the
United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the
National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.
The National Guard Militia can only be required by the
National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to
uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion).
These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the
National Guard.
Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft,
"the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for
offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States."
The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on
Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in
ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe
was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been
impeached.
During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress
to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages
of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada. The bill was defeated in the
House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power
over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into
the regular army and send them out of the country.
The fact is that the President has no constitutional right,
under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the
borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states.
Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators
to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.
Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a
speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House,
September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: "The militia, within the
meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of
the United States." In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel
Webster, "that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is
that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government;
and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution
worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which
grants and limits the power of Congress over it."
"This limitation upon the power to raise and support
armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the
Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to
voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was
intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to
limit the use of money for that purpose. Conscripted armies can be paid, but
they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the
extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the
country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia
imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or
limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such
power."
The Honorable William Gordon
Congressional Record, House, Page 640 - 1917
"Be it enacted that the militia shall consist of every
able-bodied male citizen, respective of States, Territories, and the District
of Columbia and every able-bodied male of foreign birth who has declared his
intention to become a citizen, who is more than 18 and less than 45 years of
age, shall be divided into three classes; the organized militia, to be known as
The National Guard of the State, Territory or District of Columbia, or by such
other designations by the laws of the respective States or Territories, as may
be given by the laws of the respective States or Territories, the national
voluntary reserve as provided in this act, and the remainder to be known as the
reserve militia."
The Militia Act and the revised Militia Act (the Dick Act),
make it quite clear that all men between the ages of 18 and 45 are the
(unorganized) militia with an absolute right to keep and bear Arms under the
Article II of the Bill of Rights, of whatever type; automatic or
semi-automatic, regardless of size, magazine capacity, barrel length or
caliber/gauge in any quantity they may deem necessary along with any amount of
ammunition they may determine from time to time.
"The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Report", of the
Subcommittee on the Constitution of the United States Senate Judiciary
Committee; Ninety-seventh Congress, second session, February 1982. Orrin Hatch,
Chairman.
"That the National Guard is not the "Militia"
referred to in the Second Amendment is even clearer today. Congress has
organized the National Guard under its power to "raise and support
armies", and not its power to "Provide for organizing, arming, and
disciplining the Militia." This Congress chose to do so in the interest of
organizing reserve military units which were not limited in deployment by the
strictures of our power over Constitutional militia, which can be called forth
only "to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrection, and repel
invasions." The modern National Guard was specifically intended to avoid
status as the Constitutional militia, a distinction recognized by Title 10
United States Code 311 (a)."
"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history,
concept, and wording of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States, as well as its interpretation by every major commenter and court in the
first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is
an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a
peaceful manner."
The Second Amendment right to keep and bear Arms, therefore,
is a right of the individual citizen to privately possess and carry in a
peaceful manner firearms and similar arms. Such an individual rights
interpretation is in full accord with the history of the right to keep and bear
arms previously discussed...It accurately reflects the majority of proposals
that lead up to the Bill of Rights itself.
NOW, THEREFORE, all existing or future so-called "gun
and/or ammunition laws", of whatever name or form under "color of
law", whether Federal, Federal Agency, Pseudo Federal Agency, State,
County or Municipal that infringes, abridges or restricts in any manner, the
God given, unalienable, indefeasible, Constitutional right of Citizens to keep
and bear Arms peaceably, openly or concealed, for their defense of life,
liberty, and property are prima facie violations of Article 1, Sec. 9, Part 3;
Article 6, Part 2; and Amendments I, II, IV, IX, and X of the Constitution for
the United States of America; Article 2; Sec. 1, Sec. 2, Sec. 4, Sec. 5, Sec.
27, and Sec. 29 of the Constitution for the State of Arkansas; and the Dick Act
of 1902, and are NO LAW, ab initio, ultra vires, of no force and effect,
incumbent upon no one to obey or any court to enforce.
__________________
https://www.unitedstatesmilitia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=854 SOURCE
Attention Elected Officials:
The US (Obama) signed a treaty regarding the release of all
Citizens' firearms.
The US (Obama) should not have signed a treaty that requires
US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection
and destruction center or face imprisonment."
Treason!! Treason!!!
The signing of ANY SUCH treaty
OR LAW violated the Dick Act.
No comments:
Post a Comment