WHY CAN'T CONGRESS AND/OR SCOTUS ACT?

Submitted by: Nancy Battle IS THERE ANY WAY TO GET THE IMPOSTER OUT OF THE WH?

By: Devvy
March 24, 2013NewsWithViews.com

Without the usual commentary about Barry Soetoro aka Obama and what he's done and is doing to this country, is there any way to get him out of the White House?

There has been a cry to impeach Soetoro for years by well intentioned, patriotic Americans who don't understand the issue of 'natural born citizen' and why Soetoro cannot be impeached. I'm not going to rehash it here because I've covered it in several columns already.[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]

You cannot impeach a usurper because as a candidate who had no legal right to be on the ballot, no one had the right to vote for him. Willard Romney won the election in November 2012, because Soetoro wasn't an eligible candidate. An impeachment would serve the shadow government quite well because every bill he signed into "law" would remain as legitimate, as would the unlawful confirmations of two U.S. Supreme Court Justices, Sotomayer and Kagan. Stop all the petitions to impeach Soetoro. It would set one of the worst precedents in our history because it would open the door for more impostors to lie and cheat their way into the White House.

All of the links at the bottom of this column cover the various court cases and efforts to remove the usurper.

Van Orion at Liberty Legal Foundation has been slapped down by cowards on the bench repeatedly despite being on solid legal ground:

• Georgia Ballot Challenge
• The Obamanation Strikes Back
• New Liberty Legal Foundation Class Action Suit in TN
• Their cases - kicked in the teeth by cowards on the bench

Judge orders eligibility attorney to stay away

Gutless cowards who refuse to rule according to the U.S. Constitution because Soetoro is half Negro (black is not a race). Just like the gutless cowards on the U.S. Supreme Court like Clarence Thomas:

The U.S. Supreme Court Should Be Impeached: ""U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a House subcommittee that when it comes to determining whether a person born outside the 50 states can serve as U.S. president, the high court is “evading” the issue. The comments came as part of Thomas’ testimony before a House appropriations panel discussing an increase in the Supreme Court's budget earlier this week."

Clarence Thomas has been a Supreme Court Justice for 22 years this October. If he had one ounce of integrity and loyalty to his oath, he would come out publicly and tell the truth about why the court refuses to hear one of the most important cases in the history of this nation. No, instead, he slaps us in the face with his coy little "evading" the issue comment. Does his paycheck and power mean more to him than our country? Apparently so.

Besides fighting gutless judges and the Outlaw Congress, darlings of the right have refused to do anything other than label anyone demanding the U.S. Constitution be upheld regarding an ineligible candidate, conspiracy nuts or Kool Aid drinkers. One I won't forget:

"64 million Americans voted to elect Barack Obama. Do you want to disenfranchise them? Do you think it's possible to disenfranchise 64 million Americans and keep the country? And please don't write me about the Constitution. The first principle of the Constitution is that the people are sovereign. What the people say, goes. If you think about it, I think you will agree that a two-year billion dollar election through all 50 states is as authoritative a verdict on anything as we are likely to get. Barack Obama is our president. Get used to it." Get used to having an impostor in the White House who was and still is forever ineligible to run for president? Shame on you, David Horowitz. I guess it's better for fund raising if Soetoro stays in office. He's certainly been a cash cow for Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly who mock truth seekers at every opportunity.

Montgomery Blair Sibley has been fighting this in courts for years by filing the correct legal vehicle: a quo warranto. Those are covered in the links section at the bottom. This is his latest update:

"I am still waiting on three courts to move forward on my lawsuits. All three are primed for judicial decisions -- and have been since December -- but the judges refuse to move the cases forward, hence all I can do is wait. However, I am pursuing my goal of stimulating federal prisoner lawsuits as you can see from the attached letter to FAMM -- Families Against Mandatory Minimums. I am also in email contact with several federal prisoners who are taken by arguments and thus I am hopeful that pro-se prisoner lawsuits raising those arguments will be forthcoming. I am not seeking any money -- I did raise enough to cover my legal filing and copying fees for the foreseeable future -- but could use help contacting prisoners incarcerated by (i) Obama appointed judges and (ii) Obama signed laws."

His press releases explaining this new strategy can be found here. The issue of anyone charged for a crime under any "law" signed by Soetoro was raised before by Dr. Edwin Vieira in December 2008:

"Seventh, the defendant in this hypothetical criminal prosecution can invoke the Sixth Amendment: namely, “In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right * * * to have compulsory process for obtaining Witnesses in his favor * * * .” Presumably, a properly represented defendant would subpoena Obama himself as the indispensable witness, requiring him to bring into court whatever records were in his possession or subject to his control that in any way evidenced, related to, or referred to the time, place, and circumstances of his birth, or to his citizenship, application for citizenship, renunciation of citizenship, or oath of allegiance in or to any country.

"This would include the original of his supposed Hawaiian birth certificate; every subsequent Hawaiian “certification of live birth” or like document created by public authorities; every other “birth certificate” or equivalent document whenever, wherever, and by whomever generated in the name of “Barack Obama” or any of his several other names; every document submitted to an educational institution that contained information or representations concerning his place of birth or citizenship; and so on. In the interest of expediting the process, the custodians of records in Hawaii would also be subpoenaed to testify and to produce all relevant documents subject to their control. To be sure, Obama himself might invoke a privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment as the grounds for refusing to testify or to disgorge inculpatory papers. But custodians of public records in Hawaii or elsewhere throughout the United States have no such privilege. And no Hawaiian or other law of the States or the General Government purporting to make those records “confidential” can frustrate the Sixth Amendment."

Another attorney who represented plaintiffs for several years and shot down by cowardly judges, Mario Apuzzo, has also weighed in. Mario has raised the issue of standing, a judicial hallucination, in a case, Bond v. United States, 564 U. S. decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, June 16, 2011:

"Applying the Bond decision to a case challenging Obama's eligibility, one would have to be criminally charged or be compelled to pay money under a statute passed by Congress when Obama was President. One would argue that under Article I, Section 7, Clause 2, laws passed by Congress need the action or inaction of the President (the veto power) before they are allowed to become laws. This requirement satisfies separation of powers and checks and balances doctrine. One would argue that Congress passed the charging statute, with the President's action or inaction. One would argue that a legitimate President must satisfy the eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, which contains the "natural born Citizen" clause. Then one would argue that the law is not valid because it never was presented to a legitimate President for consideration under Article I, Section 7, Clause 2, arguing that Obama is not a legitimate President because he does not meet the requirements of the "natural born Citizen" clause..."I encourage you to read Mario's full analysis.

Attorney Orly Taitz has filed so many cases, it's hard to keep track. She attended the CPAC gab fest in an effort to direct attention to the criminal actions by Soetoro: Taitz discusses Obama's forged IDs with the former Governor of VA and former counterintelligence officer Jim Gilmore. Attorney Taitz discusses with former Attorney General of the U.S. Edwin Meese Obama’s use of all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number and the cover up by the Department of Justice.

I don't play favorites as regular readers know. What I don't like is Taitz' constant attacks aimed at Sheriff Joe Arpaio and neither do others like Larry Klayman:

"Finally, this week saw the newly minted destructive actions of a so called fellow birther lawyer, Orly Taitz, who attacked my legal efforts, along with my client the Citizens to Protect Fair Election Results, to stave off an illegal recall of heroic Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa Country, Arizona (See www.cpfer.com). Telling fellow birthers and others not to financially support Sheriff Joe because he had as yet not filed criminal charges over Obama’s fake birth certificate, Taitz, as she had done before, attacked me as well. (Last week, at CPAC, Taitz also viciously attacked Breitbart.com).

"It would appear that Taitz’s latest unstable and destructive action is more about her own sense of self aggrandizement and fundraising for her own failed legal efforts, rather than trying to protect great public servants like Sheriff Joe, who by the way continues to pursue criminal proceedings before appropriate jurisdictional authorities over Obama’s birth certificate. While the Sheriff can and has gathered relevant and incriminating information in this regard, he cannot himself act on it by issuing an indictment. It remains for state attorneys general and prosecutors, and our Citizens’ Grand Jury in Ocala, Florida, to move the ball forward. See www.citizensgrandjury.com." Larry Klayman is a former Justice Department prosecutor and the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch. His latest book is "Whores: Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment."

Larry explains the grand jury in detail

"Although the customary practice for summoning a federal grand jury is by a court (see Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or FRCP), such action is mandatory "when the public interest so requires." Regardless, the FRCP does not preclude citizens from exercising their own rights to impanel grand juries under the Constitution. [See, i.e. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), establishing the doctrine of judicial review.] Thus, it is clear that citizens themselves can impanel a grand jury, and if a true bill of indictment results, the courts are technically required to commence proceedings and the executive branch to enforce the court's edicts. However, if the courts refuse and the executive branch does not carry out its duties by, for instance, arresting the criminally accused, Americans do have a right to make "citizens arrests," hold trials and legally mete out punishment in their own right. Indeed, this is what occurred in the western part of the United States, in particular, during our early years as a nation — before there was a developed federal court system and executive branch.

"Given the increasingly corrupt and treasonous actions of our public officials, which have nearly destroyed our republic, and the almost complete breakdown of the justice system as run by the government, the time has come for we Americans to rise up and use the God-given rights left to us by our founders. We can do this by using citizen-impanelled and administered grand juries to hold presidents like Obama and others at the highest levels of government accountable for the crimes that have driven our nation to the brink of extinction."

I hope you will watch this short video update on Sheriff Joe Arpaio's efforts: Breaking: Forward Movement In The Obama Identity Fraud Case. Carl Gallups gives an update after coming back from CPAC that is very encouraging.

Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, legally is a private citizen. He can be indicted and tried for his crimes, for which they are many. Besides presenting a forged birth certificate to the world, using someone else's social security number and a forged Selective Service Registration (a felony which prohibits him from working in any government job, including president), if the truth ever comes out about Benghazi, he could be tried for treason.

There will never be any action taken by Eric Holder, our racist U.S. Attorney General. Although I am not an attorney, I believe the appropriate action at the federal level would be a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) and scoop up Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi and any other Demorats besides Soetoro for their part in getting him on the ballot. RICO is white collar crimes; 35 on the list. Soetoro is guilty of not only the birth certificate forgery, etc., but also wire fraud, mail fraud, money laundering (illegal overseas donations) and "bringing in, aiding or assisting aliens in illegally entering the country (if the action was for financial gain)". The Department of Homeland Security has not seriously rounded up illegal aliens and getting them deported.

Obama supports giving drivers licenses to illegal aliens who have no legal right to be in this country and on our roads. They also have no right to jobs that belong to Americans and naturalized Americans. Comrade Obama had the audacity to say, "Undocumented workers do not come here to drive. They're here to work." "They're here to work" is aiding and assisting illegal aliens for financial gain by refusing to strongly enforce our immigration laws. Instead, his illegitimate administration has fought states like Arizona in their efforts to identify and round up illegal aliens.

I don't know why Sheriff Arpaio hasn't gone to his county district attorney or state attorney general to ask for a grand jury, but perhaps he's not ready, yet. We don't know all that's going on behind the scenes as Mr. Gallups explaines in the video above. Time is of the essence, but I know Sheriff Joe and his people have to proceed so the opportunity to bring that pathological liar camped out in the White House isn't wasted.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts! Enter Your E-Mail Address:

If I were a county district attorney or state attorney general, I would contact Sheriff Joe and work with him, and at the first opportunity, bring all the evidence to a grand jury. No county or state paycheck is worth selling out my country. No county or state paycheck is worth letting a criminal who lied and cheated his way into the White House get away with his crimes. No one is above the law and that includes Barry Soetoro.

Sadly, I doubt there are any men and women county district attorney's or state attorney generals in this country who have the moral courage to step forward and take the hard road. I hope I'm wrong, but where are their voices all these years? Any of them who step up to the plate and demonstrate we're not a country of cowards would be hailed hero by millions of Americans who know the truth and are sick and tired of seeing a stinking Marxist laugh in our faces while he gets away with his crimes. They should know we have their back and will support them.

Footnotes:

1. The conundrum of removing Obama/Soetoro from office2. Follow up