Monday, December 3, 2012

CONSERVATIVE ARTICLES 12/02/2012


Submitted by: BobJen
A FAST and Urgent Top 10 Special Edition for dissatisfied, Pro-USA Americans.
From:   To: The NationalMiddleClassNetwork & TeaParties...These columns  are not necessarily our views; more in fairness to both sides. So, please keep the feedback coming. Thanks. Also, as many know, we are having IP issues. So, if you've received this NewsMail in error or wish to be removed, please let us know. So far, those so requesting since this inception is virtually zero. Thanks again
From: Victoria Baer - The Baer Edge
Sunday ATL Journal Constitution Op-Ed: A real agenda, not a conspiracy theory http://blogs.ajc.com/atlanta-forward/2012/11/25/a-real-agenda-not-a-conspiracy-theory/ by Andre Jackson, Editorial Editor  By Field Searcy
      When I read on Page 185 of the March 2011 Cobb County Comprehensive Plan that the county supports the advancement of sustainable development policies as defined by the United Nations Division of Sustainable Development, I could no longer ignore that the U.N. Agenda 21 (A21) policies were real and thriving in America.
      The U.N. policies are detailed in a 300-page document along with the Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide. Sold as protecting the environment, sustainable development policies are more far-reaching than our fields and streams. A21 outlines plans for the control of land use, housing, transportation, food production, consumption patterns, water, energy, education, the role of industry and health care. Sounding familiar? We have been bombarded with these global plans of change.
      Warm and fuzzy words like “comprehensive planning,” “smart growth,” “public-private partnerships” and “outcome-based education” were chosen by central planners to camouflage a desired alternate outcome. As adults, we are familiar with marketers using positive labels to encourage us to act in ways not always in our best interest. These words in the A21 plan were carefully chosen to make us feel better about giving up our sovereign rights. Conversely, negative labeling and hate speech are used when citizens disagree.
      This is not a Republican or Democratic issue. Elected servants in both parties have worked to implement regionalism and public-private partnerships to fundamentally transform America. Economic models endorsing public-private partnerships violate free market principles by benefiting favored corporations, protecting private gains and leaving taxpayers obligated for losses. It proposes a “Communitarian” model of governance that is diametrically opposed to the American way.
      In reality, the U.N. policies include plans to re-engineer human society through regional equity schemes to spread the wealth. Regionalism as a subset of A21 gives appointed regional councils control of vast sums of taxpayer dollars while working unchecked. Once appointed, the taxpayers are unable to remove these councils through elections. It threatens our representative form of government. It violates our one-person, one-vote principle to equal legislative representation.
The goals of protecting our natural resources are worthy. We can embrace the need to conserve the air, water and land as well as educate our children in a positive way. The real issue is the need for deeper research and honest dialogue into the ultimate goals of U.N. Sustainable Development while preserving the American principles of respect for private property rights, free enterprise and representative government. We need to root out who really benefits from the sweeping changes, as it is not the American people. It is no accident citizens across the U.S., including Georgians, are rejecting U.N. Agenda 21 policies.
      Field Searcy, of Cobb County, led a presentation on regionalism and Agenda 21 for Georgia Senate GOP members last month.   Field Searcy  770-321-6767   www.indefenseofliberty.tv     Victoria Baer

Major Televised Event Will Expose Obama's Ineligibility Before Electoral College Certification?    Carl Gallups: Major Televised Event Will Expose Obama's Ineligibility Before Electoral College Certification?Carl Gallups of PPSimmons says he "has exclusive inside information that a surprising and...

Claims conservatives making same mistakes as bankrupt Air America

Does America still have free, fair and accurate elections?

Internet meeting spurs controversy   There's opposition to Monday's meeting of governments because it is a secretive session that involves some countries that oppose a free and open Internet.

Sher Zieve-News and Commentary-In All Things Trust God“Thou shalt have no other gods before me”
Obama complete takeover of private industry begins?
From: chp
Internet sales taxes attack states’ rights---Government intervention kills competition
THIS IS BULLS**T!
     Proponents of Internet sales taxes are asking the lame-duck Congress to bless their state tax cartel as part of a larger tax reform package by passing the Marketplace Equity Act (H.R. 3179) and its companion in the Senate, the Marketplace Fairness Act (S. 1832). These aren’t your average tax increases, but grim blueprints for government’s future relationship with the online world. Long after we’ve either swerved at the last minute or gone off the “fiscal cliff” a la “Thelma and Louise,” we’ll have to live with the harmful consequences of expanding government to every corner of the Internet.
     State and local governments already can tax in-state sellers regardless of their method of delivery to consumers — online, through the mail or in person. Now some states want Congress to let them expand their reach to tax businesses that have no physical presence and no political voice within their borders.
     This interstate grab clearly is a violation of the principle of “no taxation without representation” that so animated the Founding Fathers.The Supreme Court said as much in its 1992 Quill Corp. v. North Dakota decision. Thus, under the current regime, sales taxes are assessed only on purchases in which the seller has a store or warehouse in the buyer’s state. For example, if a New Yorker buys a book online from a California retailer, the purchase is taxed only if the retailer also has a nexus — that is, a physical presence — in the Empire State. This prevents New York from imposing its tax regime on a Golden State business that has no say in the shaping of New York tax law.    LINK
Jessica Melugin is an adjunct policy analyst at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

Obama Administration Pays Illegal Aliens to Come Here

Under Obama, American's Net Worth Hits 43-Year Low
Sher Zieve-News and Commentary-In All Things Trust God“Thou shalt have no other gods before me”
Once an enemy of the USA became POTUS and now Dictator-in-Chief, the overthrow of the USA became easy and all the other enemy infiltrations acceptable... 
CHINO HILLS, Calif. – Residents of a Southern California suburb are protesting against a hilltop home that they say serves as a maternity center for Chinese mothers paying thousands of dollars to give birth to so-called "anchor babies."
Dozens picketed a Chino Hills intersection on Saturday, holding signs that read "No Birth Tourism" and "Not Here! Not in USA!"
The city's mayor tells the San Bernardino Sun that rooms in the house have been rented out to pregnant Chinese women until they give birth.
Protesters say they don't want to see a business in a residential area.
Kelly Good tells the Sun the come legally on tourist visas, but their intention is to give birth in the United States so their children would automatically gain citizenship. She said that's a "false pretense."
Marxists overthrowing the US Constitution everywhere in the former United States of America.
Sher Zieve-News and Commentary-In all things, trust God"Thou Shalt have no other gods before me"
From: Carmel Miller
Gov. Orders Colleges to Give Illegal Aliens Discounted Tuition
      The governor of Massachusetts abused his executive authority when he ordered all of the state’s public colleges and universities to give illegal immigrants discounted in-state tuition, according to local officials who want the mandate reversed.
       Last week Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick took the liberty of ordering the state’s Department of Education to immediately begin offering illegal aliens the perk that’s supposed to be reserved for the state’s legal residents. Even U.S. Citizens who didn’t graduate from a Massachusetts high school must pay the higher out-of-state tuition at taxpayer-funded colleges. This policy applies to publicly-funded, post-secondary education in virtually every state.
      But the increasingly powerful open borders movement has been pushing hard to get every state to participate in the costly initiative of subsidizing illegal immigrants’ college education. Several—including California, Illinois, New York, Utah and Texas—already offer illegal immigrants discounted tuition. Others, such as Arizona, Georgia, Ohio and Indiana, have laws barring illegal aliens from qualifying for in-state tuition.

From: chpChinese 'maternity hotel' sparks outrage in California suburbTYPICAL LIBERAL HYPOCRISY: There are dozens of Mexicans that do this everyday: Where's the outrage there?

No comments:

Post a Comment