Submitted by: Donald Hank
Ok, folks. Pay attention. The last time this kind of demo happened, and right there on Tahrir Square, Obama immediately told Mubarak he had to step down. The mass demonstration was his excuse.
Now here it is again, same scenario but a new face. Morsi is acting the way they claimed Mubarak was acting.
Where is the administration's demand to step down? Obama is silent as the sphinx and will remain so.
That's because there is one major difference between Mubarak and Morsi.
Mubarak was an important stabilizing factor -- a facilitator and link between Israel and the Middle East. He was the glue that held things together, because he was a secularist and a pragmatist, was pro-west and didn't hate Jews.
Morsi hates Jews, is a destabilizing factor and is not pro-West. His regime is marked by severe persecution of Christians as well.
That automatically aligns Morsi with Obama. Yes, true, Obama repaid the Jews for their votes by making a half-hearted statement that they had the right to defend themselves. But this was immediately followed by a Western-brokered cease fire that will only serve to give Hamas time to regroup and was based on Western biased propaganda that it was all Israel's fault for fighting back (just as it is Assad's fault for defending his government against terrorists).
Obama's intervention in the Arab Spring and in Libya (Ghadaffi was also a pro-west secularist and a stabilizing force) and his desire to oust the pro-Christian Assad in Syria shows whose side he is on.
Just watch what he doesn't do in response to this repeat of the Arab Spring that he so warmly embraced when a pro-west, pro-Christian, pro-Jew leader was in the hot seat. I hope and pray that I am wrong.
Just two days after Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi worked with the Obama administration to help bring about a ceasefire between Israel defense forces and Palestinian terrorists in Gaza, thousands of protestors flooded Cairo's Tahrir Square...
No comments:
Post a Comment