INSANITY IN THE COURTROOM - JUDGE LOSES ALL SENSE OF DECENCY

New Petition!  Stop Muslim Sharia and Foreign Law from enforcement in American courts by activist judges. Select here, sign petition, we will fax all 535 Congressmen and Senators (saving you time!) to pass H.R. 973 and protect our Constitution.Judge: "Christians can't eat pork," enforces Muslim Sharia law upon all Ohio PrisonersIn yet another example of the Judicial Islamicization of America, a U.S. federal judge in Ohio has enforced "Sharia" Muslim law forbidding Christian prisoners from eating pork in prison.
To accommodate Muslim comlainers, an Ohio Prison Director Gary C. Mohr banned pork from all kitchen in all prisons under control of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction.  The Muslims had threatened a lawsuit to demand "halal" meals and kitchens, so ODRC entirely removed pork and forced all Christian prisoners to eat Muslim food.One brave Christian prisoner, James Rivers, filed a lawsuit opposing the enforcement of Muslim "Sharia" law upon all the prisoners, and demanded his right to eat pork.
"Plaintiff asserts that this...violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, subjects him to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eight Amendment, denies him substantive and procedural due process, and denies him Equal Protection," reads the complaint.

Sadly, the federal judge James S. Guin threw out the case, ruled against all Christian prisoners, and enforced Sharia Muslim dietary law in all Ohio prisons."While the removal of pork from prison meals may benefit Muslim as well as Jewish inmates, it also creates a meal that can be eaten by all inmates regardless of faith," wrote the Judge."[Nor would] a reasonable person … conclude that the menu change endorsed the Muslim faith. The choice is neutral to religion. Several faiths prohibit the consumption of pork..."
"Plaintiff has not alleged any facts or cited any law which suggest he has a constitutionally protected interest in eating pork as part of his prison diet..."
"Plaintiff's substantive due process claim is based on conduct alleged to be so severe that it shocks the conscience...To the contrary, Plaintiff objects to being treated the same as all other inmates. He does not allege he was denied pork while all other inmates were served this dish. Instead, he complains that all inmates are treated the same, regardless of whether they have a religious dietary restriction of this nature."
[DR. CHAPS COMMENT:  In other words, because the prison enforces Muslim Sharia law equally upon all prisoners, none of them face discrimination--they are all treated as Muslims equally, and forced to eat Muslim food equally, so Christians have no dietary rights.]

Folks, foreign Muslim Sharia law is being enforced in American courts, violating the U.S. Constitution, and establishing Islam as the mandatory religion upon Christians.

Let's demand Congress take action, to STOP Sharia law in American courts.  
Please select here to sign urgent petition, and we will fax all 535 Congressmen and Senators (saving you time!) to Stop Activist Judges from enforcing Sharia or Foreign Law in American courts.  Ask Congress to pass H.R. 973 today!

Florida Judge enforces Sharia Law over U.S. Constitution.  Legislators allow it.The Florida State legislature has failed to pass S.B. 1360, a law preventing Muslim Sharia Law from being enforced by liberal judges, especially one who hates the U.S. Constitution.The American Thinker blog reports:  "A controversy over the defeat of Florida legislation that would have restricted state courts from considering foreign laws as part of legal decisions has intensified.  This is after a Tampa judge ruled that two opposing Muslim parties have their dispute settled under Islamic sharia law 'pursuant to the Quran' in spite of the fact that one Muslim group did not want to do this...and the Florida Appellate Court denied the petition to appeal the judge's ruling.

"The proposed law, SB 1360, had been opposed jointly and lobbied against by both CAIR (The Council on American Islamic Relations) and the ADL (the mostly Jewish Anti-Defamation League) ... American citizens must be allowed to question, without being called 'Islamophobes' or 'bigots,' the inherent threat of Islamic sharia ideology, disguised as only religious law, before it endangers our American society.  The political correctness of this constitutional argument actually blinds one to the dangers of some Islamic laws...specifically those that pertain to women and children and the punishments rendered for breaking these laws...

"The 'sinister' fact is that Islamic ideology makes Muslim women and children powerless, intimidated by the obscene rules of a male-dominated society.  Sharia law requires women to present practically impossible proof of their innocence, such as eyewitnesses to being raped.  A woman who seeks justice for this crime, files for divorce, or desires child custody, or a child that strays into Western ways, has hardly any means to win in a sharia court...

"Caning and flogging in public are done in cases where a female is found guilty of a minor sexual infraction, and stoning to death for a wife's adultery is common in the Muslim world.  Amputation of a hand or foot is considered an appropriate price for thievery, while beheading, crucifying, and hanging are the recommended penalties for murder or blasphemy.  Children can also be harshly treated under sharia law by being forced to remain in the custody of an abusive father after there is a divorce.

"Killing in the name of 'family honor' is an accepted form of Islamic punishment for a woman's unfaithfulness or a Muslim child straying too far from the Islamic way..."

You can read the full article here.  Then please take action by helping us petition the U.S. Congress to pass H.R. 973 and stop Muslim Sharia from ruling all 50 states...

Please select here to sign urgent petition, and we will fax all 535 Congressmen and Senators (saving you time!) to Stop Activist Judges from enforcing Sharia or Foreign Law in American courts.  Ask Congress to pass H.R. 973 today!

Muslim Judge in U.S. court:  OK to choke people who mock Muhammad.Meanwhile another American Judge Mark Martin, a Muslim, just ruled to enforce Sharia law instead of the U.S. Constitution in a shocking case in Pennsylvania.  Get this:

An atheist joker Ernest Perce dressed for a Holloween parade as the Muslim false prophet Muhammed. While walking in the parade the atheist joker was jumped and beaten by an easily offended Muslim man, Talaag Elbayomy.  A video camera and eyewitness policeman captured the assault and testified for the atheist victim, who was physically beaten by the Muslim attacker, right here in the USA.
The Muslim attacker was an immigrant who claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in this country to represent Muhammad in any form.  He also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet.But the U.S. judge was Muslim, so he threw out the video evidence, dismissed the eyewitness cop, lectured the victim for mocking Muhammed, and freed the violent Muslim attacker.   Watch the 2 minute ABC News story here-->(and share it widely).The U.S. Judge said to the atheist:  "I'm a Muslim, I find it offensive. But you have that right, but you're way outside your boundaries or first amendment rights. This is what, and I said I spent about 7 and a half years living in other countries...In many Arabic speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in their society."

Let me get this straight.  An American Judge enforces foreign Sharia law rather than the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?  And this is happening in America?  

This is why Congress must pass H.R. 973, to stop Activist Judges from enforcing Sharia Muslim law rather than the U.S. Constitution and First Amendment.  Let's take action.
Please select here to sign urgent petition, and we will fax all 535 Congressmen and Senators (saving you time!) to Stop Activist Judges from enforcing Sharia or Foreign Law in American courts.  Ask Congress to pass H.R. 973 today!

Congresswoman: Stop judges who promote Sharia and Foreign Law over Constitution.

Conservative Congresswoman Sandy Adams (R-FL) has taken a stand for liberty and to defend the U.S. Constitution and US law, by sponsoring a bill that stops liberal activist judges from enforcing Muslim Sharia law, or foreign laws, in American Courts.   Adams wrote an op-ed article explaining her bill, saying in part:

"Imagine waking up one Sunday morning and reading the headline in your local newspaper: 'Supreme Court rules that the press can't question the president,' and imagine that their ruling cited international case law from nations like China or Cuba, where it is illegal to question the word of the executive branch. While this idea may seem far-fetched, it is a daunting possibility.

"Foreign law poses a very real threat to the American judicial system...Our Constitution laid the foundation for our nation's judicial system, and referencing or using foreign law in American courts will lead to its erosion...

"That is why I have introduced legislation to protect our Constitution and federal court systems from this type of practice. My two-page bill, H.R. 973, simply states that 'in any court created by or under Article III of the Constitution of the United States, no justice, judge, or other judicial official shall decide any issue in a case before that court in whole or in part on the authority of foreign law, except to the extent the Constitution or an Act of Congress requires the consideration of that foreign law.'

"Not only is using international precedent a transparent disregard for the Constitution, but it could be used to advance a judge's personal political agenda over the best interests of the nation. Judges have a responsibility to interpret the laws of the land, not legislate from the bench, and the practice of referring to foreign law puts their underlying motives into question. There are three particular Supreme Court cases where judges have cited foreign and international precedent: Lawrence v. Texas, where the court overturned state anti-sod omy statutes; Atkins v. Virginia, where the court held against the execution of mentally retarded capital defendants; and Roper v. Simmons, where the court outlawed application of the death penalty to offenders who were under 18 when their crimes were committed. International and foreign laws were cited in all three cases by our Supreme Court justices in reaching their decisions, setting precedent for future rulings..."

[Chaps comment:  Passing HR 973 could reverse Lawrence, and help ban sod omy!]Please select here to sign urgent petition, and we will fax all 535 Congressmen and Senators (saving you time!) to Stop Activist Judges from enforcing Sharia or Foreign Law in American courts.  Ask Congress to pass H.R. 973 today!
Adams continued:  "Currently there are over a dozen states that have introduced legislation banning foreign law on the state level - including the state I represent, Florida...[it has] become a fixture of the confirmation process for Supreme Court justices. In her 2010 confirmation hearing, Elena Kagan was questioned by Senator Charles E. Grassley, an Iowa Republican, who asked if she thought international law should factor into a federal court's decision-making process. She confirmed that she did, stating: 'I think it depends. There are some cases in which the citation of foreign law, or international law, might be appropriate.'

"This kind of practice begs the question: Are we going to allow our court systems to dictate our policymaking process based off of foreign sources or are we going to go through the proper channels prescribed by our Constitution? We must remember that we have an American judicial system in place for a reason; it is based off of our country's rich history and it is intentionally unique to our great nation. As we move forward as a country, we must work to protect it."

--Rep. Sandy Adams represents Florida's 24th Congressional District.

[Chaps comment:  Let's stand with Congresswoman Sandy Adams, and petition all 535 Congressmen and Senators to co-sponsor and pass her bill to stop Sharia in US courts.]
God Bless you, in Jesus' name,

Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt, PhD