9th Circuit Court’s Opinion That Male-Female Marriage Is “Unconstiutional” Should Be Ignored, Judges Impeached! by Gregg Jackson
Recently the most overturned court of appeals, the 9th Circuit, issued an opinion that California Proposition 8 which is a Constitutional Amendment limiting marriage to one man and one woman , to be “unconstitutional” and ordered same-sex “marriages” (which began illegally under Schwarzenegger) resume.
When homosexual activist San Francisco U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker (George H.W. Bush appointee) issued an opinion that Prop 8 was discriminatory and unconstitutional, I pointed out in August of 2010 that the opinion should be ignored and that Judge Walker should be removed from office in accordance with the California Constitution.
Shortly thereafter, when illegally altered marriage licenses once again began being issued in California to same-sex couples in direct violation of the California Constitution, I pointed out that conservative lawyers, leaders and media pundits were tragically ceding the lie that courts possess the authority to make law by not holding the governor at the time (Arnold Schwarzenegger) accountable for treating an illegal court opinion as de facto law and demanding Schwarzenegger ignore the toothless and unconstitutional opinion.
As I wrote in August of 2010:
The court’s opinion that male-female “marriage” is “unconstitutional” is absurd because it is contrary to God’s Law (God Almighty Himself has defined marriage to be between one man and one woman) which is the very basis of the Supreme Law of the Land of our nation, the U.S. Constitution! And any law (or court opinion) contrary to God’s Law is legally null and void. Plain and simple. No individual branch of government at any level of government possesses the authority to make right what God says is wrong. To quote Dr. Martin Luther King who quoted St. Thomas Aquinas: Any law contrary to God's Law is no law at all!
If Governor Jerry Brown (who refused to defend Prop 8 in court as was his constitutional and legal obligation) authorizes the issuance of illegally altered marriage licences to same-sex couples in California, he should be immediately impeached and removed from office.
Furthermore, every presidential candidate who claims to support the rule-of-law, should be publicly condemning the court’s illegal and anti-Constitutional opinion and explaining how as president, in an effort to rein in the out of control judiciary, they would ignore all unconstitutional court opinions and call for the removal of any judges who issue them.
They should also point out the fact that much of this utter lawlessness began under Willard Mitchell Romney when as governor he unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally implemented same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts falsely claiming the court ordered him to do so.
Might be nice if our leading Christian pro-family leaders and conservative media pundits did the same.
Isn’t half a decade of silence enough?
Comments: http://greggjackson.com/blog/?p=781
When homosexual activist San Francisco U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker (George H.W. Bush appointee) issued an opinion that Prop 8 was discriminatory and unconstitutional, I pointed out in August of 2010 that the opinion should be ignored and that Judge Walker should be removed from office in accordance with the California Constitution.
Shortly thereafter, when illegally altered marriage licenses once again began being issued in California to same-sex couples in direct violation of the California Constitution, I pointed out that conservative lawyers, leaders and media pundits were tragically ceding the lie that courts possess the authority to make law by not holding the governor at the time (Arnold Schwarzenegger) accountable for treating an illegal court opinion as de facto law and demanding Schwarzenegger ignore the toothless and unconstitutional opinion.
As I wrote in August of 2010:
As I have written numerous times on this site, judges can’t make law!This latest attempt by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to “overturn” a constitutional amendment must by law be ignored and the judges who issued the opinion should be removed from office.
Prop 8 which amended the California Constitution limiting marriage to one man-one woman can’t, according to the Supreme Law of California, the California Constitution, be “overturned,” “struck down” or “repealed” but by another constitutional amendment passed by the sovereign people of the state of California.
Furthermore, marriage licences can’t be altered in any way or issued to same sex couples without a binding, enabling, accompanying statute.
The court’s opinion that male-female “marriage” is “unconstitutional” is absurd because it is contrary to God’s Law (God Almighty Himself has defined marriage to be between one man and one woman) which is the very basis of the Supreme Law of the Land of our nation, the U.S. Constitution! And any law (or court opinion) contrary to God’s Law is legally null and void. Plain and simple. No individual branch of government at any level of government possesses the authority to make right what God says is wrong. To quote Dr. Martin Luther King who quoted St. Thomas Aquinas: Any law contrary to God's Law is no law at all!
If Governor Jerry Brown (who refused to defend Prop 8 in court as was his constitutional and legal obligation) authorizes the issuance of illegally altered marriage licences to same-sex couples in California, he should be immediately impeached and removed from office.
Furthermore, every presidential candidate who claims to support the rule-of-law, should be publicly condemning the court’s illegal and anti-Constitutional opinion and explaining how as president, in an effort to rein in the out of control judiciary, they would ignore all unconstitutional court opinions and call for the removal of any judges who issue them.
They should also point out the fact that much of this utter lawlessness began under Willard Mitchell Romney when as governor he unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally implemented same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts falsely claiming the court ordered him to do so.
Might be nice if our leading Christian pro-family leaders and conservative media pundits did the same.
Isn’t half a decade of silence enough?
Comments: http://greggjackson.com/blog/?p=781
No comments:
Post a Comment