|
Patriot Headlines | Grassroots Commentary Daily Digest
February 4, 2016
THE FOUNDATION"The Bible is the best of all books, for it is the word of God and teaches us the way to be happy in this world and in the next. Continue therefore to read it and to regulate your life by its precepts." —John Jay, 1784FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSISWho's Up for Another Obama Lecture on 'Who We Are'?By Allyne Caan
Speaking to the Islamic Society of Baltimore, Obama lamented that this is a "time of fear" for Muslim-Americans who are being "targeted or blamed for the violent acts of the very few." He lectured in his all-too-familiar pattern: "That's not who we are. We are one American family, and when any part of our family starts to feel separate or second-class or targeted, it tears at the fabric of our nation." In the wake of beheadings, rapes and even reports of hundreds of children being burned alive in the name of Islam, Obama had the gall to opine, "When any religious group is targeted, we all have a responsibility to speak up." What has he ever said about Muslims perpetrating those attacks — the Muslim fanatics currently wiping ancient Christian communities off the map in the Middle East? Not much, though at last year's National Prayer Breakfast he chided Christians for attacking Muslims ... in the Crusades. "You've seen too often people conflating the horrific acts of terrorism with the beliefs of an entire faith," he said Wednesday. He claimed groups like the Islamic State "twist" the Koran, and he promised, "I refuse to give them legitimacy. We should never give them that legitimacy. We shouldn't play into terrorist propaganda." It's hardly "giving them legitimacy" or "playing into propaganda" to note that radical Islamic ideology motivated attacks on the World Trade Center (1993 and 2001); assaulting the U.S.S. Cole; the attack on the U.S. military recruiting office in Little Rock, Arkansas; the Fort Hood rampage; the Boston Marathon bombing; the Garland, Texas attack; the Chattanooga and San Bernardino murders; the Charlie Hebdo attacks; the Paris massacre — and the list goes on, and on, and on. And it's hardly propaganda to note, as we've done, that there is plenty in the Koran and the Hadith (the teachings of Muhammad) advocating death to infidels. Yet the silence from many high-profile Muslims who are not unequivocally condemning these and countless other acts of terror is deafening. Indeed, the world is still waiting to hear a Muslim outcry — vocal and without exception or caveat — denouncing terrorist acts perpetrated in the name of Islam. Undeterred, Obama lectured "my fellow Christians" that "we have to understand an attack on one faith is an attack on all our faiths." Christians and Muslims, despite his insistence that we're all "descendants of Abraham," do not serve the same God. Obama is afflicted with an extreme case of a blinding Islamophilia — so much so that he is more concerned with protecting Muslims from alleged offense than with facing deadly reality. He bemoaned, "We've seen children bullied, we've seen mosques vandalized," while ignoring the fact that Americans are worried about a jihadi shooting up the local military base, recruiting center, or gathering of coworkers — all of which have happened on Obama's watch. Now, back to the supposed "all-American story." So intent is Obama on denying the obvious that he chose to visit a mosque with terrorist ties in order to demonstrate Islam's supposedly peaceful agenda. As Investor's Business Daily (IBD) reports, Obama's mosque of choice "happens to be controlled by a radical Muslim Brotherhood front group his own Justice Department has implicated in the largest terrorist fundraising plot in U.S. history." Indeed, the Islamic Society of Baltimore is part of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). In 2007, federal prosecutors named ISNA as an unindicted terrorist co-conspirator in a plot to send more than $12 million to Hamas suicide bombers. It's been under FBI surveillance as well. What's more, IBD reports that Imam Mohamad Adam el-Sheikh from the mosque told The Washington Post in 2004 that suicide bombings are "acceptable (as a method for Muslims) to defend themselves." While Islamic radicals wage war for a caliphate not only in the Middle East but worldwide, Obama keynotes at a terror-linked mosque to give Islam some free PR. As outrageous as this is, it's hardly surprising, as it's been Obama's strategy both at home and abroad since Day One: Apologize your way to world peace. Unfortunately, Obama's denial of reality has not made America — or the world — a safer place. And a premier mosque performance will not do so either. Comment | Share TOP RIGHT HOOKSHas Rubio Timed His Surge Impeccably?
Rubio has surged in the polls in the past few days, and if he performs as well with late deciders in New Hampshire as he did in Iowa, it could be a good night for him next Tuesday. But more telling than some suspect pollaganda is the number of endorsements that Rubio has collected. The statistic wonks over at FiveThirtyEight reports Rubio collected more endorsements from leaders in the GOP than any other candidate. "There has been a lot of debate this presidential campaign about how much influence party elites have on the nominating process," FiveThirtyEight's Aaron Bycoffe writes, "but endorsements have historically been among the best signs of which candidates will succeed in primaries." Recently, Rubio has received endorsements from the likes of Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA), Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) and Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC). With South Carolina's delegation supporting the Florida senator, it might not be long before the governor of the Palmetto State, Nikki Haley, also endorses Rubio. The Establishment and its faux conservatism backs Trump, so it's worth reiterating that both Cruz and Rubio stand for strong conservative principles. As we noted after the results in Iowa, Rubio pulls nearly universal perfect ratings from the American Conservative Union, Citizens Against Government Waste, National Right to Life and the NRA. The fact he's doing well is an encouraging sign for conservatism and Liberty. Comment | Share Clinton's Wall Street Connections HurtWednesday's forum between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders in New Hampshire didn't help Clinton win hearts and minds in that state. After the virtual tie in Iowa, the Democrat candidates headed over to New Hampshire to campaign before the primary. Socialist Bernie Sanders essentially has home-field advantage, what with New Hampshire populated with white liberals going gaga over the senator from their neighboring state. Yet Clinton has unleashed her ground game in hopes of mitigating her losses.At the forum hosted by CNN, Sanders said his goal was nothing short of upending the U.S. political system. "What this campaign is about is not just electing a president," Sanders said. "It is creating a political revolution where millions of people, many of whom have not been involved in the political process, stand up and demand a government which represents all of us, not just wealthy campaign contributors." Meanwhile, Clinton was left defending her deep Wall Street connections, and defending the health care system her socialist competitor wants to replace with single-payer. Sanders attacked Clinton for having a Super PAC. And when moderator Anderson Cooper asked Clinton why she had to be paid $675,000 in speaking fees from Goldman Sachs, the once "dead broke" candidate stammered, "Well, I don't know. Um, that's what they offered, so..." We noted last month that connections to Wall Street have hurt candidates on both sides of this race, as Wall Street is unpopular with both grassroots liberals and conservatives. But Clinton had her scapegoat: That vast right-wing conspiracy again. Now, it's in the open, Clinton shrilled, and, "It's gotten even better funded." Last night, Clinton partied like it was 1999, while Sanders partied like it was 1949 — in China. Comment | Share VA Officials Get Away With FraudKnow an ethics violator in need of job security? Try hooking them up with a lucrative position at the Department of Veterans Affairs. In addition to providing lackluster care to millions of veterans, numerous agency officials were found abusing their executive authority, such as Kimberly Graves and Diana Rubens. The duo was recently demoted from the Senior Executive Service sector of the VA. Government Executive provides a quick backstory:In September, the VA inspector general concluded the two improperly helped create vacancies at their respective offices and volunteered to fill them. The two employees occupying the Philadelphia and St. Paul director jobs at the time were relocated to jobs they did not volunteer for to make room for Rubens and Graves, who were working elsewhere at the time in positions with more responsibility, according to the watchdog. VA paid roughly $274,000 in relocation expenses for Rubens, and about $129,000 for Graves, for a total of more than $400,000.The VA, which hasn't exactly been quick to enact policy reforms, did address the situation, though the "punishment" amounted to nothing more than a slap on the wrist. Instead of pulling in salaries of more than $175,000 each, Rubens and Graves were paid only about $123,000 in their new roles. But even that was considered too harsh. In separate rulings issued Wednesday and Monday, the Merit Systems Protection Board struck down the demotions and reinstated the duo's former jobs. They were also awarded back pay. And their legal bills? All covered, courtesy of taxpayers. One judge, Chief Administrative Judge William Boulden, absurdly stated, "I find that there is a significant problem created by the inconsistent treatment of a comparable employee, and that this makes the penalty unreasonable under the circumstances." Translation: Because others are getting away with it, Rubens and Graves should too. Does that logic apply to tax frauds? Comment | Share Don't Miss Alexander's ColumnRead If Trump Is the Answer..., then what is the question?If you'd like to receive Alexander's Column by email, update your subscription here.
MORE ORIGINAL PERSPECTIVE
BEST OF RIGHT OPINION
TOP HEADLINES
 OPINION IN BRIEFTony Perkins: "[This week] Senate Armed Services Committee members heard plenty of sobering testimony about the repercussions of opening up combat jobs to females — and none should sicken Americans more than the news that drafting our girls is next. Sixty-five hundred U.S. girls turn 18 each day — and every one of them will be eligible for selective service if the Obama administration gets its way. ... Of course, we watched this same recklessness with the Left's other crown jewel: the repeal of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.' Then, as now, political operatives openly rejected the opinion and authority of military leaders with battle-tested experience, who cautioned that we were opening up our troops to grave danger. Five years of sexual assaults, suicides, recruitment woes and low morale later, we see they were right. In 2010, Congress was assured that opening the military to homosexuals wouldn't pave the way to transgender service — another promise now broken. Yet still we're supposed to believe the Pentagon when it says that throwing women into combat wouldn't lead to gender quotas, lower standards, or decreases in readiness? ... What kind of nation forces its sisters, daughters and granddaughters onto a battlefield against their will? That's not progress. It's the worst kind of cowardice. And what good is 'equality' if it's only setting women up for disaster and failure? As a Marine and the father of three daughters, I think the most pro-woman decision America could make is sparing them from policies that order them into harm's way."Comment | Share SHORT CUTSInsight: "The whole drift of our law is toward the absolute prohibition of all ideas that diverge in the slightest form from the accepted platitudes, and behind that drift of law there is a far more potent force of growing custom, and under that custom there is a natural philosophy which erects conformity into the noblest of virtues and the free functioning of personality into a capital crime against society." —H.L. Mencken (1880-1956)Upright: "What we are witnessing is the complete breakdown and failure of multiculturalism. ... A society cannot be unified if it preserves different cultures and cultural identities within itself. That's why our national motto is translated 'out of many, one.' To the multiculturalist it appears to be, 'Out of one, many.' History demonstrates that no nation can long survive if it forgets why it exists." —Cal Thomas The BIG lie: "[L]ike so many faiths, Islam is rooted in a commitment to compassion and mercy and justice and charity. Whoever wants to enter paradise, the Prophet Muhammad taught, 'Let him treat people the way he would love to be treated.' For Christians like myself, I'm assuming that sounds familiar." —Barack Obama (Yeah, and Muhammad was also a mass murderer who raped children.) Non Compos Mentis: "Muslim Americans are some of the most resilient and patriotic Americans you'll ever meet." —Barack Obama (Just ask the killers in Chattanooga, Fort Hood, San Bernardino, etc.) Alpha Jackass: "[Ted] Cruz will sell his mother if he thinks it'll get him another five points.” —"comedian" Trevor Noah A broken clock is right twice a day: "I think I would choose Trump. ... The reason is, Trump has proven already he's completely malleable. I don't think he has any fixed [ideas] he'd go the White House and fight for. On the other hand, Ted Cruz is not malleable. He has far right wing policies he'd pursue if he became president.” —Jimmy Carter Late-night humor: "The Bernie Sanders campaign is demanding proof that Hillary Clinton beat him in yesterday's Iowa caucus. Today Hillary said, 'Sure, let me check my server.'" —Conan O'Brien Comment | Share Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis! Managing Editor Nate Jackson Join us in daily prayer for our Patriots in uniform — Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen — standing in harm's way in defense of Liberty, and for their families. |
No comments:
Post a Comment