Cruz’s victory in
Iowa was a win, even if it was an ugly win
Chuck
Muth
February
4, 2016
We
now have our unofficial Final Four (for now):
Outsiders Donald Trump and Ben Carson and insiders Ted Cruz and Marco
Rubio. The fat lady has now begun
clearing her throat. Some post-caucus
observations on the Iowa results…
Anybody
surprised by Cruz’s victory doesn’t fully understand the unique nature of the
Iowa caucus system - which rewards strong grassroots organization - or the
socially conservative strain of voter that dominates the GOP primary electorate
there.
First
some
historical perspective: Bush beat
Reagan in Iowa in 1980. But Reagan won
the nomination. Dole beat Bush in
1988. But Bush won the nomination. Huckabee beat McCain in Iowa in
2008. But McCain won the nomination. Santorum beat Romney in Iowa in
2012. But Romney won the nomination.
So
this win really isn’t all that big of a deal.
Still, a win is a win – and better to win than lose. But here are two things to put the Iowa
results in perspective…
1.) Winning means Cruz got 8 delegates. Trump “lost.” He got 7 delegates. Indeed, Rubio came in THIRD…and he got
7 delegates, too.
Yes,
a win is a win. And Cruz won this one. But winner-take-all primary states outside
the “bible-belt” are gonna be much tougher crowds for Cruz as this process
moves forward.
2.) It is arguable that Cruz only won by playing “dirty
politics.”
Cruz
has admitted that he and some of his supporters falsely told caucus-goers just
before the start of balloting that Ben Carson had dropped out of the race and
urged Carson supporters to switch their votes to Cruz.
Disclaimer: I am a consultant to a PAC supporting Dr. Carson.
Many
Carson supporters, like Cruz supporters, are more socially conservative and
lean towards Cruz for their second choice.
So it’s not a stretch to believe Cruz’s margin of victory over Trump was
due, at least in part, to his campaign’s intentional misleading of Carson
supporters.
And
then there was the “shaming” mailer.
The
last-minute Cruz mailer was sent to historically “low turnout” voters. It looked official, as though it had come
from a government agency. At the top was
a big, bright red box with the words “VOTING VIOLATION” on it.
Underneath
the mailer explained that voting history was a public record and threatened to
expose voters who failed to vote in the caucus.
That surely scared the sheep-dip out of a lot of people thinking it was
real rather than a campaign stunt.
“Lying about Ben Carson is a dirty trick,” attorney Geraldo Rivera said on FOX News. “That is not a crime. That’s a dirty trick. This (the mailer) is a crime. I believe a case can be made that the Cruz campaign is guilty of the misdemeanor of falsely representing an official document.”
Still,
a win is a win…even an ugly win. But
Karma can do strange things to a campaign.
And I feel a disturbance in the Force.
(Mr. Muth is
president of Citizen Outreach and publisher of NevadaNewsandViews.com. You can reach him at ChuckMuth.com.)
No comments:
Post a Comment