Submitted by: W.G.E.N.
There are several articles about the Computer *GLITCH* on The Gateway Pundit web page right now. The tweets etc just won't copy over here.
I learned of how easy it would be for the computerized voting to be BOMBED way back in the mid 1990's when I was a PCO in Pierce County WA and they were going to the computerized ballots. I was also a very activist person politically and well known in the State. One day I got a phone call from a male who didn't identify himself beyond he was employed in the setting up of the computerized voting system and he told me that this system could very easily be infiltrated and votes changed without being tracked (at that time). Since computers were a new thing to me at that time I didn't understand much of what he told me but I tried to get the information to those who were more engaged in computer technology. Technology has advanced far beyond those days so the tracking has to be much more involved - but so are those who work in the industry.
Cleaning the voter roles should be done yearly - check the local Obits and note the voter registration roles. When I took a list of dead names in Pierce County WA for my precinct the Democrat Auditor told me she couldn't remove the names, that they had to come in and tell her. When I asked her how a DEAD person could do that she turned and walked away from me. With the computer technology today it should be fairly easy to take the daily death lists and compare them to the voter roles.
No more Mail In ballots unless you qualify for the REQUESTED ABSENTEE ballots each time you need it to vote.
I still maintain that paper ballots - VOTE IN PERSON with Photo ID - Voter registration roles purged every 4-6 years to prevent dead and moved names from voting - Eliminate the Motor Voter registration - Proof of being a United States Citizen in order to register to vote - will go a long way to clean up the eligible voter roles. If it is too much trouble to register with ID proof in person then that person shouldn't be *bothered* with voting.
Jackie Juntti
WGEN idzrus@earthlink.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
https://www.thegatewaypundit.
HUGE: One of Many IT Heroes Uncovers Damning Evidence Regarding Potential for Fraud Within Dominion Voting Machines
Published November 12, 2020 at 9:38am
385 Comments
A series of tweets by an IT specialist destroy almost any confidence in a protected control environment surrounding the Dominion voting machines.
Numerous heroes around the US and around the globe are pitching in to offer their expertise to save the nation and our individual freedoms. No American in good conscience wants a stolen election marred with fraud to stand.
One IT specialist by the name of Ron@CodeMonkeyZ has unloaded a series of tweets identifying major control weaknesses within the Dominion voting machine environment.
Below are a series of tweets from Ron regarding the weak or nonexistent controls within the Dominion voting machines and applications. These observations are frightening.
Ron first explains that he located a Dominion vendor user guide:
I found a vendor user guide with images showing how the Dominion 5.5 central tabulating software works and transmits results from your ballot to the county. Do you trust your election workers to copy and paste files and folders to USB without tampering? cms5.
revize.com/revize/calhoun
Ron then asks:
Are your election workers being monitored during this process? If so, who is watching them take data from the tabulator machine, copying it to a flash drive, and delivering it to the county office? Is a proper chain of custody maintained?
Next Ron notes:
Pennsylvania Department of State requested a function from Dominion Voting Software to allow local “Operators” with access to “totally blank ballots” to examine, RE-MARK IF NEEDED and allowed, and then re-scan into the tabulator. dos.pa.gov/
VotingElection
He again asks about controls surrounding the system functionality – are the election workers being monitored?:
Are your election workers being monitored during this process? If so, who is watching them take data from the tabulator machine, copying it to a flash drive, and delivering it to the county office? Is a proper chain of custody maintained?
Are your election workers being monitored during this process? If so, who is watching them take data from the tabulator machine, copying it to a flash drive, and delivering it to the county office? Is a proper chain of custody maintained?
Pennsylvania voters with blank ballots are being requested to send in their ballots to the RNC. The RNC likely believes these ballots may be a problem or may be related to fraud:
Ron claims he could find any fraud within these machines and the process surrounding them if given the opportunity to review – he also has reached out to Rudy Giuliani:
Ron notes that there are absurd settings within the software which allows a local IT guy to totally influence an election:
Who is watching the local IT guys?
Another nine tweets from Ron were unrolled – they are frightening:
5. Local IT guys have ultimate power to clandestinely change settings, thus having the ability to potentially alter an entire election. There are no checks and balances or observers of the local IT guy when he accesses machine debug and admin settings. Its unclear if logs exist.
6. Dominion is a black box with votes ultimately tabulated in a central server system. Who has access to the central server and where is the manual and security reviews of that server software?
7. Settings could theoretically have been changed during evening downtime on first night of voting. Much easier to change settings on hundreds of machines than to forge thousands of ballots. A couple of people could have done it quickly.
8. State of Pennsylvania requested semantic changes to the Dominion voting software, possibly to aid in their lawfare efforts. The word “Cast” became “Print”, obfuscating the moment when your vote becomes officially cast. For what reason is currently unknown.
9. There is an option to force the vote scanner to “overrun” a preset amount of ballots EVERY time anybody pauses the scan mid-batch. “Overrun” is undefined. Potential for abuse is high with this function, which was added shortly after 2018 mid-term elections.
Ron asks the ultimate question with the software used in the Dominion voting machines:
Again, Ron states the local IT guy who services Dominion machines has the power to decide elections:
Since everyone supposedly has the same USB key, if any participant loses that key the integrity of the election is lost:
USB drives were reported stolen in Philly before the election:
BOOM
No comments:
Post a Comment