CIA Director Gina Haspel and the British Role in the Anti-Trump Plot
| Good morning from Washington, where last evening President Trump returned to the White House after being hospitalized for three days with COVID-19. Fred Lucas reports. Voter fraud is no laughing matter, Hans von Spakovsky writes. On the podcast, Heritage Foundation legal scholar John Malcolm asks those who know her about Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. Plus: an innovative legal challenge to abortion, and the Trump administration stresses election integrity. On this date in 1981, Islamic extremists assassinate Egyptian President Anwar Sadat as he reviews troops in Cairo on the eighth anniversary of the Yom Kippur War. | |
| | | | This is a chilling testimony to the truth. This man is a hero. BLM might not think so, but that's because he proves them so, so wrong.
|
Biden Says He Will Make Roe “Law of the Land” If Supreme Court Overturns | 
And he proudly tweeted on it (Twitter). From Jenna Ellis: THIS is what an autocrat actually looks like. Joe Biden claims he won’t respect the Constitution, the Supreme Court, or the separation of powers. Remember in the debate he said, “I AM the Democratic Party.” This is disqualifying (Twitter). From Dan McLaughlin: Biden desperately laboring to alienate any pro-life voter who might have reservations about Donald Trump (Twitter). Meanwhile, the latest bewildering statement (with video) from Joe Biden: “The reason I was able to stay sequestered in my home was because some black woman was able to stack the grocery shelves” (Twitter). Context (Fox News).
|
Governor Cuomo Threatens to Shut Down Religious Institutions | 
Because, while he has no issues with protests and riots, he finds religious people, especially Jews, are a problem and must be stopped.
Daily Caller
|
| |
Teachers Union Continues to Keep Children Out of Schools | As they battle the wishes of the parents who want schools reopened.
Washington Times |
| Babylon Bee Founder Has Campus Speaking Engagement Cancelled | Cancel culture is filled with hate, even against satire that dares poke fun at their sacred cows.
Red State |
|
|
by Chris Farrell • October 6, 2020 at 5:00 am - In the next paragraph, [Washington Post reporter Scott] Shane notes breathlessly: "... Trump has accused the United Kingdom of conspiring with American intelligence to spy on his presidential campaign."
- President Trump certainly has made that claim, and one believes for very good reasons that seem to compound weekly.
- Having the British run an aggressive intelligence collection operation against Team Trump targets, bypassing US legal prohibitions, and then laundering the intelligence "take" back to US officials via the UK-US liaison relationship is precisely something an "honorary UK desk officer" might be good and adept at accomplishing. Certainly, these subjects and questions deserve closer examination, without the phony prophylactic defense of grave warnings about "sources and methods."
- CIA Director Gina Haspel can answer all of those questions, and she does not even have to touch upon classified information to do so. The American public is due her answers.
It appears CIA Director Gina Haspel (while serving as London Chief of Station from 2014 to early 2017) was an active, knowledgeable party to the efforts to target candidate Trump with an FBI-instigated foreign counterintelligence operation. Pictured: Haspel is sworn in before the Senate Intelligence Committee during her confirmation hearing to become the CIA director, on May 9, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) We have raised and discussed serious matters of fact and questions about the role of CIA Director Gina Haspel in the Anti-Trump conspiracy. It appears Haspel (while serving as London Chief of Station from 2014 to early 2017) was an active, knowledgeable party to the efforts to target candidate Trump with an FBI-instigated foreign counterintelligence operation. That seditious conspiracy carried forward to a more sophisticated and aggressive plan to carry out a soft coup against President Donald J. Trump. Looking back on news reporting concerning Haspel, we turn (with caution) to a Washington Post article from July 2019 by Scott Shane, titled: "The quiet director: How Gina Haspel manages the CIA's volatile relationship with Trump". We are supposed to believe that Haspel and her office did not cooperate with the reporter for the article. Shane disclaims Haspel involvement by writing: Continue Reading Article by Alan M. Dershowitz • October 6, 2020 at 4:00 am - But there is a countervailing right which few in the media have written about. All Americans have the right to medical confidentiality. This right is assured by federal law, state law, medical ethics and the long traditions of the medical profession. What a patient tells his doctor, or what the doctor observes from the patient, are confidential, subject only to a few limited exceptions.
- Among these exceptions is the obligation of doctors to report threats to other people, such as a highly contagious disease. It also includes the obligations of doctors and other professionals to report when they learn of abuse of or by the patient. There is no explicit exception for high ranking public officials, including the president.
- All current White Houses leak like sieves. Staff members develop quid pro quo relationships with the media: in exchange for leaking information, the media promises to treat them well. That is the reality of contemporary journalism.
- Perhaps the law should be changed and government doctors should have their first obligation to the public. But such a change would come with a high cost: presidents would not disclose to these government doctors information that they did not want to be made public. That might have a negative impact on their medical treatment.
The pubic has a right to know the details of the president's medical situation. But the president has the right to keep his medical information confidential. There is a conflict between these rights, even when they involve the president of the United States, who is a candidate for reelection. The reason the public has the right to know about the president's medical history is self-evident. He is the most powerful person in the world and he is seeking a second term. Voters are entitled to know the truth about his medical condition. No one would dispute that. Continue Reading Article |
         
|
No comments:
Post a Comment