CLINTONS TIED TO THE 'LOLITA EXPRESS' AND TO UKRAINE CORRUPTION!

Submitted by: P McMillan

CLINTON CRIME FAMILY - $29,000,000 Plus Tied The Clintons To Ukraine

“The Clinton Foundation is essentially the Lolita Express for bribery and money laundering.”

'Keep in mind that since Chelsea is a part of the Clinton Foundation, she had knowledge of all of this.  There can be no doubt. NYT indicated this near the end of the piece with their reference to Chelsea’s standing in the Foundation.  However, they also included a little more on the subject of their ties to the Ukraine. A previously undisclosed email obtained by

Keep in mind that since Chelsea is a part of the Clinton Foundation, she had knowledge of all of this.  There can be no doubt.

NYT indicated this near the end of the piece with their reference to Chelsea’s standing in the Foundation.  However, they also included a little more on the subject of their ties to the Ukraine.  A previously undisclosed email obtained by Citizens United, the conservative advocacy group, through public records lawsuits shows the name of Mr. Pinchuk, described as one of Ukraine’s “most successful businessmen,” among those on an eight-page list of influential people invited to a dinner party at the Clintons’ home.’

https://thewashingtonstandard.com/29000000-plus-tied-the-clintons-to-ukraine/

CLINTON CRIME FAMILY - $29,000,000 Plus Tied The Clintons To Ukraine

Tim Brown, TheWashingtonStandard.com

The reason the Democrats are up in arms about a bogus impeachment inquiry is because they know their gods’ heads are in the guillotine.  President Donald Trump was clearly asking for help in ascertaining the corruption that existed inside our government as well as that of Ukraine in his phone call with Ukraine President Zelensky.  Nothing was being hidden nor was any law broken, contrary to what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said.

As I reported on Thursday, the Clintons, Obama, Nellie Ohr and a money-laundering scheme were in the works.

At the center of what joins the Clintons to Ukraine is a $29,000,000 grant over 5 years starting in 2008 to the Clinton Global Initiative.

As one Twitter user deemed it, “The Clinton Foundation is essentially the Lolita Express for bribery and money laundering.”

And just so we’re clear, this is not just my opinion.  Here’s a screenshot of the Clinton Foundation’s own claims regarding the money.

Of course, the Clintons’ ties to Ukraine money has been in the news, but I’m sure you won’t be hearing from those outlets now that Democrats want to target President Trump over what their chosen ones were doing.

For instance, the New York Times reported:

Victor Pinchuk, a steel magnate whose father-in-law, Leonid Kuchma, was president of Ukraine from 1994 to 2005, has directed between $10 million and $25 million to the foundation. He has lent his private plane to the Clintons and traveled to Los Angeles in 2011 to attend Mr. Clinton’s star-studded 65th birthday celebration.

Between September 2011 and November 2012, Douglas E. Schoen, a former political consultant for Mr. Clinton, arranged about a dozen meetings with State Department officials on behalf of or with Mr. Pinchuk to discuss the continuing political crisis in Ukraine, according to reports Mr. Schoen filed as a registered lobbyist.

A previously undisclosed email obtained by Citizens United, the conservative advocacy group, through public records lawsuits shows the name of Mr. Pinchuk, described as one of Ukraine’s “most successful businessmen,” among those on an eight-page list of influential people invited to a dinner party at the Clintons’ home.

Earlier in 2012, Ambassador John F. Tefft wrote to Mrs. Clinton about a visit to Ukraine by Chelsea Clinton and her husband, Marc Mezvinsky, “at the invitation of oligarch, Victor Pinchuk.” Mrs. Clinton replied, “As you know, hearing nice things about your children is as good as it gets.”

In July 2013, the Coo see how the organization called the Clinton Foundation can continue to exist during a Clinton presidency without that posing all sorts of consequences,” said John Wonderlich, the interim executive director of the Sunlight Foundation, a government watchdog group in Washington. “What they announced only addresses the most egregious potential conflicts.”

A picture showing Chelsea Clinton with Pinchuk was also displayed in the NYT article. Chelsea Clinton and Victor Pinchuk during her visit to Kiev, Ukraine, in 2012.

Keep in mind that since Chelsea is a part of the Clinton Foundation, she had knowledge of all of this.  There can be no doubt. NYT indicated this near the end of the piece with their reference to Chelsea’s standing in the Foundation.  However, they also included a little more on the subject of their ties to the Ukraine.

The Wall Street Journal reported on the Clintons taking in money from foreign donors, including those from the Ukraine while she was Secretary of State, even though they said they wouldn’t do that.

Between 2009 and 2013, including when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, according to that foundation, which is based in Kiev, Ukraine. It was created by Mr. Pinchuk, whose fortune stems from a pipe-making company. He served two terms as an elected member of the Ukrainian Parliament and is a proponent of closer ties between Ukraine and the European Union.

In 2008, Mr. Pinchuk made a five-year, $29 million commitment to the Clinton Global Initiative, a wing of the foundation that coordinates charitable projects and funding for them but doesn’t handle the money. The pledge was to fund a program to train future Ukrainian leaders and professionals “to modernize Ukraine,” according to the Clinton Foundatmmerce Department began investigating complaints that Ukraine — and by extension Mr. Pinchuk’s company, Interpipe — and eight other countries had illegally dumped a type of steel tube on the American market at artificially low prices.  A representative for Mr. Pinchuk said the investigation had nothing to do with the State Department, had started after Mrs. Clinton’s tenure and been suspended in July 2014. He added that at least 100 other people had attended the dinner party at Mrs. Clinton’s house and that she and Mr. Pinchuk had spoken briefly about democracy in Ukraine.

A deal involving the sale of American uranium holdings to a Russian state-owned enterprise was another example of the foundation intersecting with Mrs. Clinton’s official role in the Obama administration. Her State Department was among the agencies that signed off on the deal, which involved major Clinton charitable backers from Canada.

There was no evidence that Mrs. Clinton had exerted influence over the deal, but the timing of the transaction and the donations raised questions about whether the donors had received favorable handling.

Even if Mr. Clinton steps down, there could be remaining complications about a potential president’s name being affixed to an international foundation. And Chelsea Clinton, who is its vice chairwoman, would continue her leadership role.

“It is very difficult situation. Several alumni are current members of the Ukrainian Parliament. Actual donations so far amount to only $1.8 million, a Pinchuk foundation spokesman said, citing the impact of the 2008 financial crisis.

The Pinchuk foundation said its donations were intended to help to make Ukraine “a successful, free, modern country based on European values.” It said that if Mr. Pinchuk was lobbying the State Department about Ukraine, “this cannot be seen as anything but a good thing.”