BERTRAND DAILY REPORT The War For Your Mind and Soul Continues
Subject: Seth Rich DNC Thumb-Drive / Wikileaks is About to Surface Like a Nuclear Sub on Steroids, Federal Judges Now Want Answers--Videos
Have you noticed lately?? Bits and pieces (of information) are gaining traction (again) ahead of a major release of documents [DECLAS] by AG John Huber and IG Michael Horowitz, expected to "rock the consciousness of the nation" according to "high level sources" statement to Sean Hannity.
The heart of the Russian scandal concerning hacked emails from a DNC server, continuously being spouted by fakestream media to help cover Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Communist Party, is the murder of Seth Rich....the taboo 'Conspiracy Theory' being protected.
Three days after his death (July 2016), the DNC in collusion with Hillary Clinton, the FBI and CIA, were desperate and needed a scapegoat [Russia] to blame for their accusations of "election meddling" and the stealing of classified emails to add spice to their already 'Russian Dossier' allegations against President Trump....justifying the Mueller investigation which failed miserably for the Dems.
Recent revelations concerning Seth Rich's patriotic actions to download 30,000 plus emails from a DNC server to a thumb-drive and then handed that thumb-drive over to Julian Assange [Wikileaks] is surfacing again with a federal judge demanding more information. The judge's decision (better late than never) comes on the heels of evidence proving Russia agents could not have hacked the DNC, because the download speeds, etc and markers prove it was an inside job. (IMO) "Gucifer 2.0" is a false flag created by the intelligence agencies.
"Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (which includes two former NSA technical directors), working with independent forensic investigators, concluded two years ago that what “everyone knows to be Russian hacking of the Democratic National Committee” actually involved an insider with physical access to DNC computers copying the emails onto an external storage device — such as a thumb drive. In other words, it was a leak, not a hack."
It was alleged that Seth Rich felt it was "his duty and patriotism for America," having witnessed within his own party absolute corruption and the Bernie Sander's loss of voters by DNC / HRC operatives to knock Bernie out-of-the Primaries.
The crap we as Americans have had to endure for over two years is now closing-in on the actual perpetrators that committed treason against the United States in-order to over-throw a sitting president.
The cover-up of the Seth Rich murder is as bad as talking about Sandy Hook, let alone 9/11, and is another reason why all social media platforms are on strict notices to censor any and all reports such as this one.
The parents of Seth Rich know better as to what happened, but are censored themselves !
"FoxNews analyst Ellen Ratner (in a lawsuit) admits Julian Assange / Seth Rich connection in detail.
The lawsuit alleges, the parents of Seth Rich know that Seth passed those emails to Julian Assange associates with the help of his brother [Aaron] and they “refuse to allow their son to be blamed for Trump winning the presidency.”
We know the DNC went into immediate damage control in July 2016, after Seth was murdered, and [persuaded] the parents to avoid discussing anything with media and at the same time provided the family with a DNC attorney [watch dog].
Sean Hannity has been silenced by the family [DNC] attorney and cannot talk about the fact that Sean Hannity’s interview inside the Ecuadorian Embassy with Julian Assange CONFIRMED that “Russia, nor any state player provided the Hillary Clinton / Podesta emails to Wikileaks,” but stopped a hair short of admitting that Seth Rich was the actual DNC hacker. Following that interview, Assange offered a $20,000 reward for anyone with information as to who killed Seth Rich." ---Dave Bertrand
Reported July 16th, 2019
"New Evidence Proves Russia Did Not Collude With Julian Assange, Seth Rich's Parents Know The Truth "Didn't Want Their Son Exposed As Helping Trump Win"
Deep State operatives around the world DO NOT want Julian Assange extradited to the U.S. on the most minimum charges necessary in-order to get his testimony in a U.S. federal court, and they have incorporated a massive movement by [selected] dis-information journalists to suggest their free speech, as journalists, is under attack if the U.S. is successful by bringing Julian Assange to America.
Julian Assange has nearly confessed that Seth Rich provided the DNC thumb-drive to Wikileaks and [emphasized] that Russia was not hacking the DNC. Assange offered a $20,000 Reward for any information leading to the arrest of the person(s) that murdered Seth Rich.
Julian Assange is so freaked-out by the so-called journalists demanding that Julian not be extradited, I reached-out to Julian via our friend Nigel Farage a few months ago to explain exactly how and why the minimum charges had to be used to extradite Julian, (1) for his safety and (2) to help America recover from the Russian illusion / collusion lies and pave the way for some very nasty people to be tried for treason.
Nigel Farage never responded back....maybe because the Deep State are alleging Nigel is a "co-conspirator with the Russians" after he showed-up at a Trump rally.
Julian Assange's ticket back home to Australia is via the United States justice system. The charges against him are so ridiculous, it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure that out ! AND....let's say [we] are wrong and the DoJ attempted to adjudicate the charges against Julian, there is no doubt in anyone's mind...Julian would walk-out of court a free man, but the dis-information agents / journalists are going to drive Julian into a mental institution to keep his mouth shut about Seth Rich.
Now that Federal Judges are demanding evidence that Russia hacked the DNC servers (see article below), the truth will surface like a nuclear sub on steroids.
Amazingly enough......the Seth Rich conspiracy yelling from the grave and the massive revelations concerning Epstein, all lead to the Clinton's. Everything happening and NOT being reported fairly by the fakestream media is a lead-up to the [DECLAS] for the specific purpose to re-engage the public's awareness for when the sh*t hits the fan.
To give Julian Assange the benefit of (his) doubts about coming to the U.S., the latest suicide of Epstein, [we are to believe], is enough to scare the crap out of Assange when the Clinton beast is lurking in the Deep State Swamp.
Julian Assange has the proof and can put the Russian meddling conspiracy to rest, once and for all, if he lives to talk.
---Dave Bertrand
[Example of Deep State Talking Points]
Mueller Report: Wikileaks exploited Seth Rich's murder for conspiracy
Assange tells congressman Russia wasn't source of Dem emails
|
|
Seth Rich's Ghost Won't Go Away
As if it weren’t enough of a downer for Russiagate true-believers that no Trump-Russia collusion was found, federal judges are now demanding proof that Russia hacked into the DNC in the first place.
It is shaping up to be a significant challenge to the main premise of the shaky syllogism that ends with “Russia did it.”
If you’re new to this website, grab onto something, as the following may come as something of a shock. Not only has there never been any credible evidence to support the claim of Russian cyber interference, there has always been a simple alternative explanation that involves no “hacking” at all — by Russia or anyone else.
As most Consortium News habitués are aware, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (which includes two former NSA technical directors), working with independent forensic investigators, concluded two years ago that what “everyone knows to be Russian hacking of the Democratic National Committee” actually involved an insider with physical access to DNC computers copying the emails onto an external storage device — such as a thumb drive. In other words, it was a leak, not a hack.
VIPS based its conclusion on the principles of physics applied to metadata and other empirical information susceptible of forensic analysis.
But if a leak, not a hack, who was the DNC insider-leaker? In the absence of hard evidence, VIPS refuses “best-guess”-type “assessments” — the kind favored by the “handpicked analysts” who drafted the evidence-impoverished, so-called Intelligence Community Assessment of Jan. 6, 2017.
Conspiracy Theorists
Simply letting the name “Seth Rich” pass your lips can condemn you to the leper colony built by the Washington Establishment for “conspiracy theorists,” (the term regularly applied to someone determined to seek tangible evidence, and who is open to alternatives to “Russia-did-it.”)
Rich was a young DNC employee who was murdered on a street in Washington, DC, on July 10, 2016. Many, including me, suspect that Rich played some role in the leaking of DNC emails toWikiLeaks. There is considerable circumstantial evidence that this may have been the case. Those who voice such suspicions, however, are, ipso facto, branded “conspiracy theorists.”
That epithet has a sordid history in the annals of U.S. intelligence. Legendary CIA Director Allen Dulles used the “brand-them-conspiracy-
Rich Hovers Above the Courts
U.S. Courts apply far tougher standards to evidence than do the intelligence community and the pundits who loll around lazily, feeding from the intelligence PR trough. This (hardly surprising) reality was underscored when a Dallas financial adviser named Ed Butowsky sued National Public Radio and others for defaming him about the role he played in controversial stories relating to Rich.On August 7, NPR suffered a setback, when U.S. District Court Judge Amos Mazzant affirmed a lower court decision to allow Butowsky’s defamation lawsuit to proceed.
Judge Mazzant ruled that NPR had stated as “verifiable statements of fact” information that could not beverified, and that the plaintiff had been, in effect, accused of being engaged in wrongdoing without persuasive sourcing language.
Imagine! — “persuasive sourcing” required to separate fact from opinion and axes to grind! An interesting precedent to apply to the ins and outs of Russiagate. In the courts, at least, this is now beginning to happen. And NPR and others in similarly vulnerable positions are scurrying around for allies.??The day after Judge Mazzant’s decision, NPR enlisted help from discredited Yahoo! News pundit Michael Isikoff (author, with David Corn, of the fiction-posing-as-fact novel Russian Roulette). NPR gave Isikoff 37 minutes on its popular Fresh Air program to spin his yarn about how the Seth Rich story got started. You guessed it; the Russians started it. No, we are not making this up.
It is far from clear that Isikoff can be much help to NPR in the libel case against it. Isikoff’s own writings on Russiagate are notably lacking in “verifiable statements of fact” — information that cannot be verified. Watch, for example, his recent interview with Consorti
Isikoff admitted to Lauria that he never saw the classified Russian intelligence document reportedly indicating that three days after Rich’s murder the Russian SVR foreign intelligence service planted a story about Richhaving been the leaker and was killed for it. This Russian intelligence “bulletin,” as Isikoff called it, was supposedly placed on a bizarre website that Isikoff admitted was an unlikely place for Russia to spread disinformation. He acknowledged that he only took the word of the former prosecutor in the Rich case about the existence of this classified Russian document.
In any case, The Washington Post, had already debunked Isikoff’s claim (which later in his article he switched to being only “purported”) by pointing out that Americans had already tweeted the theory of Rich’s murder days before the alleged Russian intervention.
‘Persuasive Sourcing’ & Discovery??
Butowsky’s libel lawsuit can now proceed to discovery, which will include demands for documents and depositions that are likely to shed light on whatever role Rich may have played in leaking to WikiLeaks. If the government obstructs or tries to slow-roll the case, we shall have to wait and see, for example, if the court will acquiesce to the familiar government objection that information regarding Rich’s murder must be withheld as a state secret? Hmmm. What would that tell us?
During discovery in a separate court case, the government was unable to produce a final forensic report on the “hacking” of the Democratic National Committee. The DNC-hired cyber firm, CrowdStrike, failed to complete such a report, and that was apparently okay with then FBI Director James Comey, who did not require one.
The incomplete, redacted, draft, second-hand “forensics” that Comey settled for from CrowdStrike does not qualify as credible evidence — much less “persuasive sourcing” to support the claim that the Russians “hacked” into the DNC. Moreover, CrowdStrike has a dubious reputation for professionalism and a well known anti-Russia bias.
The thorny question of “persuasive sourcing,” came up even more starkly on July 1, when federal Judge Dabney Friedrich ordered Robert Mueller to stop pretending he had proof that the Russian government was behind the Internet Research Agency’s supposed attempt to interfere via social media in the 2016 election. Middle school-level arithmetic can prove the case that the IRA’s use of social media to support Trump is ludicrous on its face.
Russia-gate Rubble
As journalist Patrick Lawrence put it recently: “Three years after the narrative we call Russiagate was framed and incessantly promoted, it crumbles into rubble as we speak.” Falling syllogism! Step nimbly to one side.
The “conspiracy theorist” epithet is not likely to much longer block attention to the role, if any, played by Rich — the more so since some players who say they were directly involved with Rich are coming forward.
In a long interview with Lauria a few months ago in New Zealand aired this month on CN Live!, Kim Dotcom provided a wealth of detail, based on what he described as first-hand knowledge, regarding how Democratic National Committee documents were leaked to WikiLeaks in 2016.
The major takeaway: the evidence presented by Dotcom about Seth Rich can be verified or disproven if President Trump summons the courage to order the director of NSA to dig out the relevant data, including the conversations Dotcom says he had with Rich and Rich may have had with WikiLeakspublisher Julian Assange. Dotcom said he put Rich in touch with a middleman to transfer the DNC files to WikiLeaks. Sadly, Trump has flinched more than once rather than confront the Deep State — and this time there are a bunch of very well connected, senior Deep State practitioners who could faceprosecution.
Another sign that Rich’s story is likely to draw new focus is the virulent character assassination indulged in by former investigative journalist James Risen.
On August 5, in an interview on The Hill’s“Rising,” Risen chose to call former NSA Technical Director Bill Binney — you guessed it — a “conspiracy theorist” on Russia-gate, with no demurral, much less pushback, from the hosts.
The having-done-good-work-in-the-
Those at the top of the relevant agencies, however, are only too happy to provide grist. Journalists have to make a living, after all. Topic A, of course, is Russian “interference” in the 2016 election. And, of course, “There can be little doubt” the Russians did it.
“Big Jim” Risen, as he is known, jumped on the bandwagon as soon as he joined The Intercept, with a fulsome article on February 17, 2018 titled “Is Donald Trump a Traitor?” Here’s an excerpt:
“The evidence that Russia intervened in the election to help Trump win is already compelling, and it grows stronger by the day.“There can be little doubt now that Russian intelligence officials were behind an effort to hack the DNC’s computers and steal emails and other information from aides to Hillary Clinton as a means of damaging her presidential campaign. … Russian intelligence also used fake social media accounts and other tools to create a global echo chamber both for stories about the emails and for anti-Clinton lies dressed up to look like news.“To their disgrace, editors and reporters at American news organizations greatly enhanced the Russian echo chamber, eagerly writing stories about Clinton and the Democratic Party based on the emails, while showing almost no interest during the presidential campaign in exactly how those emails came to be disclosed and distributed.” (sic)
Poor Jim. He shows himself just as susceptible as virtually all of his fellow corporate journalists to the epidemic-scale HWHW virus (Hillary Would Have Won) that set in during Nov. 2016 and for which the truth seems to be no cure. From his perch at The Intercept, Risen will continue to try to shape the issues. Russiagaters major ally, of course, is the corporate media which has most Americans pretty much under their thumb.
Incidentally, neither The New York Times, The Washington Post, nor The Wall Street Journal has printed or posted a word about Judge Mazzant’s ruling on the Butowsky suit.
Mark Twain is said to have warned, “How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and [how] hard it is to undo that work again!” After three years of “Russia-Russia-Russia” in the corporate — and even in some “progressive” — media, this conditioning will not be easy to reverse.
Here’s how one astute observer with a sense of humor described the situation last week, in a comment under one of my recent pieces on Consortium News:
“… One can write the most thought-out and well documented academic-like essays, articles and reports and the true believers in Russiagate will dismiss it all with a mere flick of their wrist. The mockery and scorn directed towards those of us who knew the score from day one won’t relent. They could die and go to heaven and ask god what really happened during the 2016 election. God would reply to them in no uncertain terms that Putin and the Russians had absolutely nothing to do with anything in ‘16, and they’d all throw up their hands and say, ‘aha! So, God’s in on this too!’ It’s the great lie that won’t die.”
I’m not so sure. It is likely to be a while though before this is over.
From the Desk of Capt. Dave Bertrand (Ret.) Your Comments Are Welcomed and Can Be Published Unless You Specify Otherwise.
Retired Int'l Freight Captain (DC-8 & B-727), Former (State) Law Enforcement, U.S. Customs (UC) Miami Sector, US Army Military Police Veteran, Former Int'l Aircraft Repo Insurance Contractor, Former DHS/HWW Counter-Terrorism Instructor for Commercial Truckers, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University & University of Alaska (Undergraduate), Interests include Border Security, 9/11 Truth, Government Corruption, New World Order, Freedom vs Communism, Secret Space Programs & UFO Encounters, Aviation, and Enjoy Living Off-The-Grid.
Read Past Bertrand Daily Reports: Search Result
No comments:
Post a Comment