The Report From Iron Mountain: Hoax or Implemented Strategy to Bring America Down
Started by Robert M
On Friday, President Obama once again issued a gun control executive order under the pretense that develo... will
reduce so called gun violence. The left is on a serious mission to
accomplish their gun control objectives at all costs, as they
continually call for confiscation laws similar to those enacted in
Australia.
If you are an avid gun rights supporter, then you know the actual statistics prove
that guns are used for legitimate self defense far more often than
murder. These facts however; do little to calm the consistent cry for
stricter gun control laws because the objective is control, not safety.
The very fact that the left so routinely ignores these statistics, while
displaying such a callous disregard for a person’s inherent right to
self defense, while also showing such a high regard for the brutal
practices of Planned Parenthood suggests there just might be another agenda at work. Sadly, there is an historical precedent that tells the story, and it is the same every single time.
Tyrants
rise to power by promising a better world and demonizing those who
oppose. Citizens are stripped of their rights and dehumanized for
failing to conform to the dictates of an enlightened leader. Strict gun
control laws are passed to ensure no man has the means to resist and
millions are senselessly slaughtered. In the twentieth century more
people were killed by their own governments in a time of peace than were
killed by foreign armies in a time of war. Today, it is through the
climate change agenda that the left seeks to impose its visions of
population control in order to save the planet. In order to easily
accomplish this, people must first be disarmed.
The
left has consistently proven that they have little regard for the
sanctity of human life. This is most evident not only in their incessant
support for abortion, but in the way they have allowed black Americans
to adopt the victim mentality that has destroyed so many of their lives.
Through the constant race baiting and deliberate, but subtle attempts
to whip up anger among the black communities, the left has done little
but alienate these people, push back racial relations and turn many
young men into hate filled, cold blooded murderers. The inner city
ghettos, governed mostly by Democrats who make promises they have no
intentions, or means of keeping, bear witness to an unprecedented rate
of senseless murder in the black community, and the left does next to
nothing to stop it. In fact, they make the situation worse by passing
more gun control laws. The results of this have sparked fear of a racial
conflict as all of the problems caused by Democrats are projected onto
the whole of White America. This concept is known as “White Privilege.”
A racial conflict is the necessary crisis that would give the U.N. the needed excuse to implement the small arms treaty and do away with the Second Amendment. All Americans should be alarmed by this because the U.N., in order to combat “Climate Change,” has called for a massive reduction in the world’s population. In fact, U.N. Climate Secretary Christine Figueres has stated for the record that global communism would
be the best way to combat climate change. The fundamental lie fueling
this agenda is that human beings, through consumption, are causing
global warming and the only way to stop it would be to decrease the
amount of carbon being released into the atmosphere. For all of those
people who support the climate change agenda, let me remind you that you
exhale carbon dioxide; the number one gas the left claims contributes
to climate change. Do you think you will be safe because you supported
them? Communists always kill their supporters first.
There
is a reason why there seems to be two issues being intermingled into
one in this article. That in and of itself is proof, in my opinion, of
the lies driving the agenda to cause conflict, disarm the citizens and
begin the work of reducing the world’s population. You see, what we are
witnessing is the application of more than one “scenario” being
implemented in order to gain control and implement global government.
One “model” entails the creation of an external enemy while the other
actually suggests the use of climate change, or the
environmental-pollution model. This evidence can found in The Report from Iron Mountain. There
are many websites that refute this report and claim that it is a hoax;
however, there are many strategies outlined in the report that bear a
striking resemblance to many of the events we are witnessing today.
Before I go on, let me explain a little about the report itself. The
report was written to deal with the perceived problem of a peace time
economy, or an economy no longer being fueled by the need for war. War
has traditionally been a very successful method of maintaining control
over the population. This report seeks to develop methods of maintaining
that control in the event of a peacetime economy. Consider the
following passages –
When it comes to postulating a credible substitute for war capable of directing human behavior patterns in behalf of social organization, few options suggest themselves. Like its political function, the motivational function of war requires the existence of agenuinely menacing social enemy. The principal difference is that for purposes of motivating basic allegiance, as distinct from accepting political authority, the “alternate enemy” must imply a more immediate, tangible, and directly felt threat of destruction. It must justify the need for taking and paying a “blood price” in wide areas of human concern. PP.53
In this respect, the possible enemies noted earlier would be insufficient. One exception might be the environmental-pollution model, if the danger to society it posed was genuinely imminent. The fictive models would have to carry the weight of extraordinary conviction, underscored with a not inconsiderable actual sacrifice of life; the construction of an up-to-date mythological or religious structure for this purpose would present difficulties in our era, but must certainly be considered. pp.54
It
is also possible that the two functions considered under this heading
may be jointly served, in the sense of establishing the antisocial, for
whom a control institution is needed, as the “alternate enemy” needed to
hold society together. The relentless and irreversible advance of
unemployability at all levels of society, and the similar extension of
generalized alienation from accepted values may make some such program
necessary even as an adjunct to the war system. As before, we will not
speculate on the specific forms this kind of program might take, except
to note that there is again ample precedent, in the treatment meted out
to disfavored, allegedly menacing, ethnic groups in certain societies
during certain historical periods. pp.54
The
first paragraph is pretty general in meaning. The perceived social
enemy can be almost anything that causes people to make the necessary
sacrifices of their freedom in order to combat it. Global warming and
the deliberate instigation of racial conflict are both good examples,
but the creation of Isis and the use of mass shooting episodes are
definitely possible options for the social engineers pulling the
strings.
It
is the second and third paragraphs that become more specific in their
intentions. Paragraph two for example, cites the
“environmental-pollution” model as a means of scaring the public into
believing that there is an immediate danger to their safety. Climate
change is something constantly being shoved down our throats and as
mentioned earlier, the Global elite are trying to convince you that
global communism is the only way to deal with it. Finally we reach the
third paragraph which in my opinion is probably the most telling. Here
we have the writers admitting that is possible to use the so called
“oppressed minorities” and turn them into an “alternate enemy” that may
be useful in pushing for the type of control these people seek. In this
case we see the constant inflaming of racial tensions and divisive
rhetoric designed to make black people and other minorities believe they
are being oppressed by whites. This in turn is creating a societal
menace that many people are beginning to fear; thus, contributing to the
completion of the objective.
There
is another element to this that needs to be considered. It is the
Democrat Party that has the racist past in this country. It is the
Democrat Party that supports abortions and places Planned Parenthood
clinics in minority neighborhoods. It is the Democrat party that
consistently tells black Americans that they are incapable and in need
of their assistance, and it is the Democrat Party that governs the inner
city ghettos where blacks are killing one another on a continuous
basis. It is also the Democrat Party pushing the global warming agenda. I
guess the appropriate question would be which population of people do
the global elite seek to reduce?
No comments:
Post a Comment