THE 'WHY' OF THE OBAMA REGIME'S UN TREASON

Treason Of Obama Regime’s UN Agenda – January’s Next Big Step Towards Global Govt Rick Wells | December 27, 2015 at 7:21 pm URL: http://wp.me/p4yNKg-6gW Many of us recognize that the government of the United States no longer exists in the form it did in previous decades, the last two have been particularly devastating. The slow creep into despotism that had accelerated under Bush is now at a free fall under Obama, with the future that our social engineers have envisioned and are assigning to us much more closely resembling the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin than the United States under anybody prior to Obama. Even those of us who recognize that the United Nations is an evil, anti-American, subversive force working specifically to undermine our Constitution and to establish a world government in which we our Constitution and rights are subjugated might be shocked to learn the degree to which they have already accomplished major portions of their agenda. Last September, at the Sustainable Development Summit in New York, the UN, with a large degree of George Soros and other elite-funded fanfare and demonstrations, implemented world government controls. The usual “celebrity trash” was there, with Beyonce and Mooch Obama drooling over each other to the delight of the stupid people in attendance who showed up for the “free entertainment,” all it costs them is their future and that of their children, their grandchildren and beyond. The Bidens were there as well and Hussein Obama appeared on video. Sustainable Development is a deliberately vague term that can be subject to interpretation and more importantly, to misinterpretation. Its definition as intended by those in power, both within the hijacked United States federal government as well as in the UN is simple. Sustainable Development means UN Government. They invariably put whatever spin is appropriate to the particular subject matter at hand, but the definition is consistently and undeniably, a UN globalist government. At the September UN meeting broad general concepts and an outline were adopted, with the specific text supposed to be approved and put into effect in January, 2016. There are some intermediate goals to be reached by 2020, with a devastating restructuring of the global system, a New World Order, by 2030. One UN source document is referenced in this article, making the points of exactly what treachery is afoot easily verifiable. The source document is the UN publication “Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform” on the UN Sustainable Development website.  It is titled “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” Please remember, Sustainable Development is a euphemism for global UN Marxist government. That reality will become much clearer once a few of the goals have been revealed. In order to sound the alarm, while maintaining brevity, only some of the more offensive and threatening components will be detailed in this article; it is incomplete and other articles will follow in the upcoming days in preparation for the rollout by the criminal elite. In donning the mantle of humanitarian legitimacy, the document declares “All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan. We are resolved to free the human race from the tyranny of poverty and want and to heal and secure our planet. We are determined to take the bold and transformativesteps which are urgently needed to shift the world on to a sustainable and resilient path. As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind.” The three common elements repeated throughout both the new Sustainable Development program as well as its Millennium and Agenda 21 predecessors are what they label as the “three dimensions of sustainable development: the economic, social and environmental.” Those are the three paths to world government under the UN plan, one that is active, under way and being implemented. Fundamental to every aspect of this plan, a ridiculously unachievable and grandiose one that is more fitting of a naïve wish liberal wish list than a serious international agreement are immediate and far reaching global agreements to provide funding and opportunities, transferring wealth from developed nations to undeveloped ones. The fact that the undeveloped nations will require the assistance in making the most of those money making opportunities of the developed nation corporations is not mentioned as a motivation for the “humanitarian” drive. It’s all about saving the people and “equality,” their quality of life considerations. Sure it is. Consider the following most offensive items from the document, but there are so many more that could have been listed if time and space allowed, which can be easily found on the source document. They will be addressed in future articles as well as some of the consequences of these actions. There are 17 Sustainable Development goals, all of which will be addressed in the coming days and weeks. Whatever you do, don’t miss number 27 below. That should convince even the most skeptical of readers that there is something dangerous to this world government scheme. We resolve, between now and 2030, to end poverty and hunger everywhere; to combat inequalities within and among countries; to build peaceful, just and inclusive societies; As we embark on this great collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind. Recognizing that the dignity (Marxist Buzzword) of the human person is fundamental. This is an Agenda of unprecedented scope and significance. It is accepted by all countries and is applicable to all From a standpoint of asking the rhetorical question of “who’s going to pay for all of this mess,” knowing the answer is the fattened hogs of the United States, it’s worth including the following excerpt of item 7, to illustrate just how expensive and unrealistic this UN plan is, making its motivation clearly not the altruistic ones that they profess. It is worth bearing in mind that Hussein Obama promised us we were getting fundamental transformation, and this item declares that “vision.” It is also important to remember that in order to enforce these dictates, a supreme authority over every aspect of the human existence around the globe will be required. Global authoritarianism will be the inevitable result of its implementation. In these Goals and targets, we are setting out a supremely ambitious and transformational vision. We envisage a world free of poverty, hunger, disease and want, where all life can thrive. We envisage a world free of fear and violence. A world with universal literacy. A world with equitable and universal access to quality education at all levels, to health care and social protection, where physical, mental and social well-being are assured. A world where we reaffirm our commitments regarding the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation where there is improved hygiene; and where food is sufficient, safe, affordable and nutritious. A world where human habitats are safe, resilient and sustainable and where there is universal access to affordable, reliable and sustainable energy. As you read consider how closely the text matches the social engineering crap that has been flowing out of the Obama White House, particularly in number eight, below, but throughout the document. He’s clearly a UN globalist agitator, taking us down a road we don’t want to be on. We envisage a world of universal respect for human rights and human dignity, the rule of law, justice, equality and non-discrimination; of respect for race, ethnicity and cultural diversity; and of equal opportunity permitting the full realization of human potential and contributing to shared prosperity. A world which invests in its children and in which every child grows up free from violence and exploitation. A world in which every woman and girl enjoys full gender equality and all legal, social and economic barriers to their empowerment have been removed. A just, equitable, tolerant, open and socially inclusive world in which the needs of the most vulnerable are met. Reflecting upon the Obama Kenya and other Africa speeches puts that agenda firmly in line with this o We envisage a world in which every country enjoys sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth and decent work for all. A world in which consumption and production patterns and use of all natural resources – from air to land, from rivers, lakes and aquifers to oceans and seas – are sustainable. (Centrally Controlled by Big Brother) One in which democracy,( the UN oligarchy by another name) good governance and the rule of law, as well as an enabling environment at the national and international levels, are essential for sustainable development, including sustained and inclusive economic growth, social development, environmental protection and the eradication of poverty and hunger. One in which development and the application of technology are climate-sensitive, respect biodiversity and are resilient. One in which humanity lives in harmony with nature and in which wildlife and other living species are protected. If these things are going to be mandated, somebody is going to have to be involved in the regulation, planning and the enforcement. That somebody is the all powerful central government. Listen for the same familiar descriptions that we hear from politicians, particularly those on the left in the item below. Also notice the way that inequalities are treated as a problem that must be addressed and rectified rather than the results of successes by those achieving at a higher level. The Marxist model is clearly at the heart of this scheme. We are meeting at a time of immense challenges to sustainable development. Billions of our citizens continue to live in poverty and are denied a life of dignity. There are rising inequalities within and among countries. There are enormous disparities of opportunity, wealth and power.... Global health threats, more frequent and intense natural disasters, spiraling conflict, violent extremism, terrorism and related humanitarian crises and forced displacement of people threaten to reverse much of the development progress made in recent decades. Again, in the interest of brevity: (18) Emphasize that the Agenda is to be implemented in a manner that is consistent with the rights and obligations of States under international law. We reaffirm the importance of the Universal declaration of Human Rights 21. The new Goals and targets will come into effect on 1 January 2016 and will guide the decisions we take over the next 15 years. (24) All people must enjoy a basic standard of living, including through social protection systems. We commit to providing inclusive and equitable quality education at all levels – early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, technical and vocational training. To promote physical and mental health and well-being, and to extend life expectancy for all, we must achieve universal health coverage and access to quality health care. No one must be left behind. We will seek to build strong economic foundations for all our countries. Sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth is essential for prosperity. This will only be possible if wealth is shared and income inequality is addressed....We will strengthen the productive capacities of least developed countries in all sectors, including through structural transformation. We will adopt policies which increase productive capacities, productivity and productive employment; financial inclusion; sustainable agriculture, pastoralist and fisheries development; sustainable industrial development; universal access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy services; sustainable transport systems; and quality and resilient infrastructure. Remember, it can’t be overstated, when they say sustainable, they’re talking government controlled, big brother involved in everything we do. Item number 27 is illustrative of that, as the role of government controllers is increased, the references to sustainability increase proportionally. We commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services. Governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-State actors and individuals must contribute to changing unsustainable consumption and production patterns, including through the mobilization, from all sources, of financial and technical assistance to strengthen developing countries’ (where the money is going and the profiteering businesses are waiting to take advantage) scientific, technological and innovative capacities to move towards more sustainable patterns of consumption and production. 29. We recognize the positive contribution of migrants for inclusive growth and sustainable development. We also recognize that international migration is a multidimensional reality of major relevance for the development of countries of origin, transit and destination, which requires coherent and comprehensive responses. We will cooperate internationally to ensure safe, orderly and regular migration involving full respect for human rights and the humane treatment of migrants regardless of migration status, of refugees and of displaced persons. Such cooperation should also strengthen the resilience of communities hosting refugees, particularly in developing countries. These are the UN’s words and it’s no accident that all of this invasion in Europe and the US has occurred  as the UN was setting up a program of invader rights and protections. It is most certainly going to get worse as the newly awarded powers of the UN are exercised under whatever form of international law they choose to burden us with and may be the premise under which the Islamic invasion is given the legitimacy or legality that provides the cover needed to overcome the objections of the American people. The official recognition of the “contribution of migrants” rather than the sanctity of borders is a tool which will be used by the opponents of national sovereignty, as will the humanitarian and human rights angles which will be exploited by agitator groups. The plan is in many ways obvious. The globalist enemies are in New York and Washington. They are within our gates. The enemy is in the UN building, the White House and on Capitol Hill. Please look for future articles in the coming days. The source document for this article can be found at this link. Laura J Alcorn Let's  Invite More to our social network.   Send these post to your email groups and friends. Like us on  Facebook