Previously posted ...
Embroilment !!! - the Barbecue of Destitution
http://conpats.blogspot.com/
✡ ✡ ✡
Yavoh ~ He is coming !
Yahweh - Yeshua - Ruach Ha-Kodesh
Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה
BREAKING NEWS FROM ISRAEL
Minute by minute updates here ...
Watching for Yeshua Ha-Mashiach
http://www.kolbonews.com/
https://friendsoflibi.org/
http://www.ynetnews.com/home/
http://www.jewishworldreview.
http://www.israpundit.org/
http://www.voiceofisrael.com/
http://www.defendingzion.org/
http://www.breakingisraelnews.
http://pamelageller.com/
http://www.jihadwatch.org/
http://www.joyofkosher.com/
http://prophecyupdate.
http://www.prophecynewswatch.
http://prophecynewsdaily.com
http://www.itshallcometopass.
http://www.
http://hummingbird027.com/
http://www.testingtheglobe.
http://pawcreek.org/
http://www.
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/
http://www.yeshua-hamashiach.
http://www.hebrew4christians.
http://www.templeinstitute.
http://universaltorah.com/
http://free.messianicbible.
Pray at the Kotel - the Western Wailing Wall
http://free.messianicbible.
Entire Media News on this Planet
click continue to use PressDisplay.com
http://www.pressdisplay.com/
Excellent ...
Thanks - beloved Alexander Higgins
Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media
Note: I have long suspected the the US Government was performing such operations. Specifically during the height of the BP gulf oil spill many of my posts would be absolutely viral on several social media websites and get absolutely trashed and buried on others. While this could be explained by different user communities.
However, what would explain why a story published by me gets buried on Reddit and another blogger reposts my exact story and it goes viral. As is said I was always suspicious, particularly of the Digg and Reddit user communities, but had no proof so never wrote about it. Readers of my blog with their own blogs have complained about the exact same thing. Here’s an excellent example of pro-nuclear shills hijacking a thread on Reddit.
Needless to say it has been a while since I have posted either Digg or Reddit for this reason. I can say the problem still exists on Reddit because while I no longer post there some readers do and within the last week stories posted there have been buried that have been absolutely viral elsewhere. Now – on with the news.
Shocking details on the Military’s ‘sock puppet’ software creates fake online identities to spread pro-American propaganda and trash online stories that don’t fit with the Feds Agenda [...]
http://alexanderhiggins.com/
♥†♥ ♥†♥ ♥†♥
Excellent ...
Thanks - beloved Tony Caputo
w vid Benghazi 101: What You Need to Know Ahead of Clinton's Testimony - NBC News
embedded - Five Things to Know About Today's Benghazi Hearing (0:44)
The 2012 attack on a U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya, killed four Americans and caused a slew of political fallout, some of which is still reverberating today.
On Thursday, Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton will testify about the attack in front of a Republican-led House committee — and what she says about it could have major implications for her White House bid.
Here is what you need to know about the attack itself and the investigation that followed it, plus how it affects Clinton, who was secretary of state at the time.
What happened in Benghazi?
On Sept. 11, 2012, after night had fallen, attackers scaled the wall of a U.S. diplomatic outpost in the Libyan port city of Benghazi. Clinton would later be called upon by House committees to testify about what happened next — although at first, those details were a little murky. [...]
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/
A man hath joy by the answer of his mouth: and a word spoken in due season, how good is it!
Proverbs 15:23 KJV
Benghazi Zoo + Bibi is Correct !!!
HILLARY CLINTON TESTIMONY BEFORE HOUSE HEARING ON BENGHAZI
IS IN RECESS AND WILL RESUME SHORTLY ... 2:00pm edt resuming at 2:30pm edt
http://www.foxnews.com/
UNANSWERED PLEAS FOR HELP Clinton faces tough questions about
lack of response to murdered envoy's requests for more Benghazi security
w vid Clinton challenged at hearing over security at Benghazi outpost
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was confronted Thursday with tough questions by Republicans over the slim diplomatic security in place at the Benghazi compound before the 2012 terror attacks -- and repeated unanswered requests by the late Ambassador Chris Stevens for more support -- as she testified before the congressional committee probing the attacks.
She faced tough questions from Republicans even as Democratic panel members spent their time trying to discredit the work of the committee itself, describing it as a partisan outfit. But amid claims that the panel has focused too much on Clinton's personal email use, Republicans tried to focus Thursday on Benghazi.
Rep. Lynn Westmoreland, R-Ga., noted that the late Ambassador Chris Stevens asked "numerous times" for extra security in Libya and questioned whether he was able to ask Clinton directly.
"I do not believe that he had my personal email," Clinton admitted, before adding that Stevens had a "direct line" to others.
Clinton acknowledged some of his requests were approved, and others were not. She also testified that those requests were handled by security professionals in the department and not her.
"I did not see them. I did not approve them. I did not deny them," she said.
Rep. Mike Pompeo, R-Kan., later questioned why security requests apparently didn't go to her, yet a number of detailed messages on Libya from associate Sidney Blumenthal did.
The hearing comes at a critical juncture not only for the committee itself but in Clinton's presidential campaign. Following a strong debate performance last week, Clinton on Wednesday also saw the man who may have represented the biggest primary threat to her candidacy, Vice President Biden, opt out of running.
Yet questions about her personal email use and her actions relating to the Benghazi attack loom over her run.
The former State Department leader tried to downplay questions about what her emails did and did not show by claiming much of her work was done over phone, in person and other ways.
She said she mostly did not work over email, and even said she did not have a computer in her office while secretary of state. The puzzling comments before the Benghazi congressional committee came even as she lamented that diplomacy is still being conducted in a 19th-century way.
"I didn't conduct the business that I did primarily on email," she said, adding that she generally did not email during the day.
Despite these claims, investigators are looking into a number of work-related emails Clinton sent at the department and whether they contained classified material.
The emails came up under questioning from Rep. Susan Brooks, R-Ind., who asked why so few of her emails addressed Libya in the lead-up to the attack.
At the hearing, Clinton also was challenged over her advocacy for military intervention in Libya, with a GOP member describing her as the "architect" of a policy that has led to "disaster."
Clinton defended her role, saying she pushed for intervention to prevent "mass massacres," but stressing that President Obama made the final call to use U.S. military force.
"Our Libya policy couldn't have happened without you, because you were its chief architect," Rep. Peter Roskam, R-Ill., told her, adding: "Things in Libya today are a disaster."
Clinton said she does not "subscribe" to that view.
The exchanges marked early clashes in a hearing that is expected to last hours, as Clinton tries to settle questions about her role during highly anticipated testimony before the congressional panel probing the tragedy.
In the opening moments of the hearing, before Clinton delivered her opening statement, Republican and Democratic leaders of the committee sparred sharply over its work.
Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., the committee's top Democrat, said the panel was only formed because Republicans "did not like the answers" from prior investigations. So, he said, they established the committee and "set them loose, madam secretary, because you're running for president." Cummings called it an "abusive effort to derail" her campaign.
But Benghazi committee Chairman Trey Gowdy strongly denied this.
Of allegations that the investigation is all about Clinton, Gowdy said Thursday, "Let me assure you it is not."
Gowdy also laid out the purpose of the day's testimony, saying they owe the "truth" about what happened to the victims of the 2012 terror attack.
"They were killed under circumstances most of us could never imagine," Gowdy, R-S.C., said. "They were more than four images on a television screen.... They were Americans who believed in service and sacrifice."
For that sacrifice, Gowdy said, "We owe them and each other the truth." He said he wants a "final definitive accounting" of what happened.
Gowdy said that includes answers over what the U.S. was doing in Libya, what happened to requests for additional security and what the government told the public after the attacks.
In her opening statement, Clinton said she was there to "honor the service" of the four men who died. She argued that America "must lead in a dangerous world" and said it would "compound the tragedy" for America to "retreat from the world."
"Our diplomats must continue representing us in dangerous places," she said.
However, she did not in her opening remarks reference evidence that under her leadership, the State Department ignored requests for additional security from then-Ambassador Stevens, killed in the attack along with three other Americans. This, as well as concerns that she helped push a faulty narrative that the attack grew out of protests over an anti-Islam Internet video, were sure to surface Thursday.
Clinton and her supporters have gone on the offensive in the run-up to the hearing, accusing the committee of being a Republican political arm. Gowdy and the six other Republicans on the panel have denied this.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
http://www.foxnews.com/
Excellent ...
Thanks - beloved Debbie
Netanyahu’s Right:
Haj Amin Al-Husseini Called for Speeding Up, Extension of Hitler’s Final Solution
by Debbie Schlussel
We live in a world in which, today, you cannot tell the truth. You cannot say babies are ugly. You cannot say Oprah is fat and gross. You cannot say parents who allow their young kids to watch “The Walking Dead” are idiots (Michelle Fraudkin alert). You cannot say the Kardashians are whores and porn stars. You cannot say women aren’t fit to be Navy SEALs and Marine infantry. You cannot say that extremist Muslims are worse than or even the same as Nazis (though they are worse), or you’ll lose your job at ESPN. And you cannot tell the truth–a truth I’ve noted here many times over the years to many uninformed dummies and a truth for which Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is being pilloried today for repeating: .
In fact, Al-Husseini, as I’ve repeatedly noted on this site, begged Hitler to speed up the Final Solution and extend it to the Middle East.
But people choose to sit in the dark rather than admit that their precious anointed Islam is anything but what it is: a cult that preaches mass murder and destruction. I had to explain this over six years ago to a Yale University Law School moron, Janice Ta (now a lawyer, apparently) who hosted “Bake for Obama!” and who had no idea of Al-Husseini and his Hitler connection. Today her ilk repeat their willful ignorance and denial. As I wrote in 2009, in “Clueless Lefties Completely Ignorant About Hitler’s Ties to the Muslims“:
For the extremely ignorant, here’s a brief tutorial on Hitler, the Nazis and their Muslim friends–the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who met with Hitler and advised him to finish the job on the Jews and speed up the Final Solution, and who begged Hitler to export the Final Solution to Israel and the rest of the Jews in the Mid-East and North Africa; TWO Muslim SS Divisions; and the close relationship, even decades after WWII, between the Nazis, their ODESSA organization for SS officers, and the Muslims–the reason why so many wanted Nazi war criminals like Aribert Heim a/k/a Tarik Hussein Farid and Alois Brunner were shielded for life in Syria and Egypt, respectively, and why the SS helped Gamal Abdel Nasser and the Egyptians in their attempt to build nuclear and other missiles to kill Jews. And that’s not to mention all the concentration camps in North Africa, which the Nazis enlisted their Muslim buddies to guard (and to round up the Jews for).
But, hey, these are all irrelevant, right? So insignificant. I wrote that in response to Ta’s extremely ignorant e-mails, below: […]
http://www.debbieschlussel.
No comments:
Post a Comment