|
Patriot Headlines | Grassroots Commentary Daily Digest
September 7, 2015
THE FOUNDATION"I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious." —Thomas Jefferson, 1824TOP RIGHT HOOKSUnemployed Labor Day
Obama turned his address into a call for a budget from Congress that will "support working Americans and strengthen our middle class." Naturally, he wants "investments" in the same old stuff — infrastructure, schools and research. All fine things, but when 94 million Americans aren't working (and aren't paying taxes to support that budget), Obama's promises and braggadocio ring hollow. Comment | Share Clinton's Secret Server Had a Secret IT GuyTurns out, once a Clinton lackey, always a Clinton lackey. IT specialist Bryan Pagliano was paid by the Clintons to run Hillary's secret email server while she headed the State Department, Clinton's campaign admitted last week. Pagliano worked on Hillary's failed 2008 presidential campaign and then moved over to the State Department. But he never stopped getting paid by the Clintons. According to the Post, Pagliano disclosed to State in April 2009 that the Clintons paid him $5,000 for his tech expertise. But for some reason, Pagliano then quit reporting his Clinton income. Was it just a matter of convenience, to avoid awkward questions? Or, as Ed Morrissey wonders, was it something more sinister, like a bribe to keep the email server secret? When three congressional committees asked Pagliano to the Hill to testify about the server last week, Pagliano declined, invoking the Fifth Amendment. Some members of Congress indicated that they might grant Pagliano immunity if he testifies against his former employers, which indicates there are bigger fish to fry, namely fish of the Slimis Clintonus variety.Comment | Share West Hammers TrumpDonald Trump interviewed with radio host Hugh Hewitt and badly fumbled a foreign policy question. "I'm looking for the next commander in chief to know who Hassan Nasrallah is, and Zawahiri, and al-Julani, and al-Baghdadi," Hewitt said. "Do you know the players without a scorecard, yet, Donald Trump?" Trump, who is about attitude, not details, called it a "gotcha question." But it doesn't matter anyway, he explained. "You know, I'll tell you honestly, I think by the time we get to office, they'll all be changed. They'll be all gone. I knew you were going to ask me things like this, and there's no reason, because, number one, I'll find — I will hopefully find Gen. Douglas MacArthur in the pack." He then boasted, "I will be so good at the military, your head will spin." Ah, well, never mind then!Lt. Col. (ret.) Allen West's response to Trump's vacuous and ignorant answer was perfect: "No, I don't think it's a gotcha question. When you are running for the presidency of the United States of America, the most important title is commander in chief. ... This is a great teachable moment. ... Our national politics are starting to resemble American Idol. ... I want to see our candidates out there that understand the geopolitical scene and not be like President Obama." Comment | Share FEATURED RIGHT ANALYSISBeefing Up Obama's Pro-Amnesty AgendaBy Arnold Ahlert
The DOJ insisted Nebraska Beef violated the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) because it required "non-U.S. citizens, but not similarly-situated U.S. citizens, to present specific documentary proof of their immigration status to verify their employment eligibility.” Yet the act itself states that "employers may hire only persons who may legally work in the United States (i.e., citizens and nationals of the U.S.) and aliens authorized to work in the U.S. The employer must verify the identity and employment eligibility of anyone to be hired, which includes completing the Employment Eligibility Verification Form (I-9).” Adding insult to injury, the act warns employers that they can be penalized if they fail to complete and/or retain those I-9 forms. Judicial Watch put this outrage in the proper perspective: "You know the nation is in trouble when a U.S. business gets investigated by its own government for following the law." Regardless, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta, head of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, was adamant. “The department is committed to ensuring that individuals who are authorized to work in the United States can support their families and contribute to our country’s economic growth without facing unnecessary and discriminatory barriers to employment,” she stated. “We will vigorously enforce the law to remove such barriers where we find them, and ensure that affected individuals have a means of seeking relief.” "Relief" in this case amounts to Nebraska Beef paying $200,000 in a civil penalty settlement, establishing an uncapped back-pay fund for people who lost wages because they could not prove they are in the country legally, and two years of compliance monitoring. The company is also required to train employees on the anti-discrimination provision within the Immigration and Nationality Act and to revise policies within its office. The anti-discrimination provisions of the act can be seen here. The germane clause states that employers "may not treat individuals differently based on citizenship or immigration status. U.S. citizens, recent permanent residents, temporary residents, asylees and refugees are protected from citizenship status discrimination.” All well and good, save for one seemingly inherent contradiction: How is a company supposed to determine a potential employee’s status and eligibility to work in the United States without documentary proof? A 2014 federal audit conducted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) inspector general revealed the bigger stakes in play here, noting the Obama administration has not only been “inconsistent” in enforcing the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), but it reduced the average fine for businesses caught hiring illegals by a whopping 40% between 2009 and 2012. Now the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division is getting in on the act, helping to facilitate the administration's pro-amnesty agenda. All Americans should be outraged, but none more so than black Americans. Another disappointing jobs report Friday revealed that only 173,000 jobs were created in August, despite predictions of 220,000. And though the unemployment rate dropped to 4.4% for whites, a drop of 0.2% from July, black unemployment is 9.5%, up 0.4% from July. Unfortunately, both of those figures hardly tell the real story. The daunting reality is that a record-setting 94,031,000 Americans were not in the labor force last month, and the labor participation rate is 62.6% — the lowest level since 1977. When those people are counted, the overall unemployment rate, trumpeted to be 5.1%, more than doubles to 10.3%. Even worse, wages for all American workers have declined from the time the so-called recovery began in 2009, right through 2014 — with lowest paid workers taking the biggest hit. All while Obama champions amnesty for million of illegals who would drive those wages even lower — for as long as a decade. In short, the fundamental transformation, or more accurately, the balkanization of America, continues. Assimilation has been tossed on the ash heap of history, in favor of the multiculturalist "celebrating our differences” nonsense that is tearing this nation apart. The transnationalists who would abet our descent into Third World-ism for cheaper labor and reliable big-government votes must be thoroughly rejected by an electorate that still treasures national sovereignty. And it’s about time presidential candidates other than Donald Trump heartily embrace the one irrefutable statement he has made (echoing Ronald Reagan, by the way): A nation without borders is no nation at all. Comment | Share
MORE ORIGINAL PERSPECTIVE
BEST OF RIGHT OPINION
TOP HEADLINES
OPINION IN BRIEFGeorge Will: "Massachusetts' flag shows a Native American holding a bow and arrow, a weapon that reinforces a hurtful stereotype of Native Americans as less than perfectly peaceful. A gimlet-eyed professor in Wisconsin has noticed that Minnesota’s flag includes the state seal, which depicts two figures, a pioneer tilling a field, and a Native American riding away — and carrying a spear. A weapon. Yikes. The farmer is white and industrious; the Native America is nomadic. So, Minnesota’s seal communicates a subliminal slander, a coded message of white superiority. Who knew that Minnesotans, who have voted Democratic in 10 consecutive presidential elections since 1972, are so insensitive? This is liberalism’s dilemma: There are so many things to be offended by, and so little time to agonize about each."Comment | Share SHORT CUTSInsight: "We are for aiding our allies by sharing our material blessings with nations which share our fundamental beliefs, but we are against doling out money government to government, creating bureaucracy, if not socialism, all over the world." —The GipperUpright: "A state official who objects to protecting enumerated constitutional liberties is hardly in the same position as a person objecting to facilitating a 'right' five justices created out of whole cloth (historically speaking) five minutes ago. If one can’t see the difference in those propositions, then we should just give up on public discourse entirely because reason and logic no longer matter." —David French in National Review The BIG Lie: "I'm doing all that I can now to try to be as transparent about what I did have on my work-related emails, and I think that they will be coming out. I wish it were faster. ... At the end of the day I am sorry that this has been confusing to people and has raised a lot of questions." —Hillary Clinton, apologizing to all you confused rubes out there Friendly fire, part I: “At this point, to suggest that as secretary of state, as much as [Hillary Clinton had] been around, she didn’t think about the impact and the possibility of hacking, just astonishes me. I think it takes away from her big argument of ‘I’ve been there, I’ve done that, I know what I’m doing.’” —Tom Brokaw Blame the system: "[T]here’s a massive amount of overclassification [in government]. People just stamp it on quickly because it's a way to sort of be correct if anybody had a judgment that somehow they had been wrong about whether it should be classified or not. So the easy thing is classify it and put it away." —John Kerry defending the presumed Democrat presidential nominee Friendly fire, part II: "In itself, the Iran deal would appear to reward Tehran for defying the world, make funds available for its extremist activities and generally make it stronger militarily and economically. Although the agreement provides for a temporary delay in Iran’s nuclear enrichment capability, it allows Tehran to retain its nuclear infrastructure and obtain sanctions relief. The risk is that Iran could become an even bigger threat to the region." —former Obama Defense Secretary Leon Panetta Belly laugh of the week: "Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article misstated Kim Davis’s political affiliation. She is a Democrat, not a Republican." —New York Times And last... "Nothing says 'I'm innocent' like paying a State IT guy to setup a secret server who 'forgets' to report the income and later pleads the 5th." —Twitter satirist @hale_razor Comment | Share Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis! Managing Editor Nate Jackson Join us in daily prayer for our Patriots in uniform — Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen — standing in harm's way in defense of Liberty, and for their families. |
No comments:
Post a Comment