Doctors, midwives revolt over mandatory abortions
Started by Robert M
A
formal complaint has been submitted to the United Nations against
Sweden over its practice of requiring physicians and others to perform
abortions.
While
there was an uproar in the United States and a successful court
challenge to President Obama’s plans to require people to pay into a
fund for abortions, in Sweden officials have carried the mandate much
further, according to the complaint submitted by the European Center for Law and Justice.
Director
Gregor Puppinck wrote to Heiner Bielefeldt, special rapporteur on
freedom of religion or belief, at the office of the high commission on
human rights at the U.N.
The victims are represented by several named midwives, doctors and pediatricians, he explained.
While
“the right to conscientious objection in relation to abortion is
largely recognized in European and international human rights law,”
there is no such accommodation in Sweden, he said.
The
letter cited the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, which
ruled: “No person, hospital or institution shall be coerced, held
liable or discriminated against in any manner because of a refusal to
perform, accommodate, assist or submit to an abortion, the performance
of a human miscarriage, or euthanasia or any act which could cause the
death of a human fetus or embryo, for any reasons.”
However,
in Sweden, officials adopted a position “against the freedom of
conscience of medical practitioners,” Puppinck’s letter said.
“In Sweden, a doctor cannot refuse to perform an abortion even if the only reason is the sex of the baby,” he wrote.
Worse yet are the complications from late-term abortions.
“Some
medical personnel refuse to participate in abortions, especially late
term abortions, because of the risk that the aborted child may be born
alive. This is a complication that is not exceptional and is becoming
more common when the pregnancy is more advanced,” the letter explains.
In
fact, a study from 2007 found more than 3 percent of abortions after 16
weeks produced a child born alive. At 23 weeks, the initial survival
rate was about 10 percent.
“Swedish
midwife Siv Bertilsson considers that a quarter of babies abortion
after the 16th or 17th week live between 5 and 15 minutes. To see these
newborns struggling for breath and dying alone is inhumane for the child
and traumatic for the midwife. Siv Bertilsson participated in abortions
beyond 12 weeks at the beginning of her career. She has horrible
flashbacks of those newborns dying in a bowl,” the letter continued.
“She
was afterwards able to avoid participating in abortions but a
reorganization of the department will soon force her to participate
again, against her will. She therefore wonders whether to leave the
profession she has been exercising for 36 years.”
One
specific case developed when Dr. Andrea Kischkel tried to have a mother
transferred to the 3rd level Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ... where
neonatologists try to save premature born babies’ lives, the letter
said.
“That
was refused because it was an abortion. A little girl was born alive on
1st March 2014 at 7:55 p.m. The midwives were not allowed the contact
the pediatrician on call. Therefore, the child was given no medication,
no pain relief although she had been pulled out by vacuum extraction. A
midwife swept the baby into warm towels and waited until she had died,
nearly half-an-hour later.”
The targets of the complaint are the officials in Swedish government who adopt laws and make regulations.
“The
Swedish government and parliament regularly reject proposals of a
conscience clause for medical staff and students. Sweden considers that
people who have belief concerning the respect for life must choose an
occupation without link to pregnancy,’ the complaint says.
“The former minister for social affairs, Mr. Goran Hagglund, said it publicly.”
Doctors
and midwives can be removed from their jobs, medical students can be
deprived of their diplomas and more under Sweden’s pro-abortion
mandates.
As
a result, people with “all the scientific skills and human qualities
for these professions are deterred from them by the systematic
discrimination they undergo.”
“In
the end, the patients, especially pregnant women, suffer the
consequences of this obstinacy. Sweden suffers from a shortage of
midwives but persists for ideological reasons rather than accepting
skilled staff whose belief it disapproves of,” Puppinck wrote.
Citing
the European Court of Human Rights, which said that forcing people to
change jobs is not the appropriate balance between abortion advocacy and
respect for life, the complaint said the “ban on conscientious
objection” is out of line.
“It
is a systemic violation,” the letter said. “The authors are national
authorities who refuse to set a legal framework allowing for the
exercise of the right to conscientious objection, national and local
medical authorities who refuse, except in exceptional cases, individual
agreements reconciling effective operation of health services and right
to conscientious objection.”
|
Saturday, May 30, 2015
STOP THIS MADNESS OF WHOLESALE MURDER!!!
Submitted by: Kathy Hawkins
No comments:
Post a Comment