|
Standing Up to the PC Pee-Pee Police
by Chuck Muth
April 12, 2015
AB375 is a bill before the Nevada Legislature that simply says
– get this – boys must use the boy’s restroom in public schools and girls must
use the girl’s restroom.
Well, duh.
Yet the left is howling in horror at such a notion, claiming
“transgender” kids will commit suicide if they can’t use whatever restroom they
want.
Oh, puh-lease.
Liberal opponents – the PC (politically correct) Pee-Pee
Police - have resorted to claiming “discrimination” and “institutionalized
bullying” in order to advance their position - a clear indication that their
position is on extremely weak ground.
But no matter how the PC Pee-Pee Police try to cloud this
issue, it’s really not that tough…
If you have a, um, pee-pee, you pee-pee in the boy’s
restroom. If you do not have a pee-pee,
you pee-pee in the girl’s restroom.
That’s not “bullying.”
That’s common sense.
But what if you’re a boy who “thinks” he’s a girl trapped in
boy’s body who feels “uncomfortable” using the boy’s restroom?
Good grief.
Well, OK. Whatever.
But if that’s the case, how is the proper solution to make
all the girls who are actually girls uncomfortable by having a boy-who-thinks-he’s-a-girl
using their restroom?
Why does this boy-who-thinks-he’s-a-girl have a “right” not
to feel “uncomfortable” when using a restroom, but all the girls-who-think-they’re-girls
don’t have a “right” not to feel uncomfortable by having that boy-who-thinks-he’s-a-girl
in the restroom with them?
Doesn’t one person’s rights end where another’s begins?
And can you just imagine the uproar the first time the
boy-who-thinks-he’s-a-girl tinkles on the seat or leaves the seat up?!! There’ll be riots in the hallways!
Adults, who love to make simple issues complicated, came up
with what, on the surface, appeared to be a simple solution: Let any self-identified transgendered kids
use a dedicated unisex restroom or a faculty restroom. Problem solved.
Sorry, Charlie. That made too much sense.
The PC Pee-Pee Police hath declared that offering
transgendered students the option of using a separate restroom if they feel
uncomfortable using the appropriate gender-reality-based boy’s or girl’s restroom
amounts to discrimination and a civil rights violation.
What a load of poopy-ka-ka.
Let’s slide down this slippery slope of insanity to its
natural conclusion, shall we?
The argument here is that the boy “thinks” he’s a girl and,
therefore, is entitled to be treated like a girl – including using the girl’s
restroom.
Well, what if I “think* I’m a black guy trapped in white guy’s
body?
Does that mean I should be entitled to preferential
treatment in hiring and college admissions?
And shouldn’t I receive preferential treatment in landing a
government contract or small business loan, just like my darker-skinned fellow
(please circle current politically correct term)
black/colored/Negro/African-
I mean, wouldn’t it be discrimination not to give me all the
special benefits afforded to people-of-color minorities just because I’m a
white guy who only "thinks" I’m black?
This whole issue, as well as the arguments of those who want
to open the girl’s restrooms to boys, is absurd. But you know the worst part?
Assemblywoman Vicki
Dooling (R-Las Vegas) introduced AB375.
Yes, she’s a conservative. But she’s also one of the
sweetest ladies you’ll ever want to meet.
I mean, when you picture grandma carrying a plate of freshly-backed
chocolate-chip cookies into the backyard for the neighborhood kids playing in
the sandbox, that’s Mrs. Dooling.
There’s isn’t a hateful bone in this woman’s body.
And yet, because of her common sense bill that says boys
must use the boy’s restroom and girls must use the girl’s restroom, she’s been
called every vile name in the book by the PC Pee-Pee Police.
They’ve accused her of being a bully. Of being a hate-mongerer. Of being a bigot. She’s even been compared to the racial
segregationists of the 1960s.
I know Vicki Dooling.
Vicki Dooling is a friend of mine.
And Vicki Dooling is none of those things.
I don’t know why more of Mrs. Dooling’s colleagues haven’t
come more vocally to her defense, but even though this isn’t exactly a
front-burner issue for me, I’ll be darned if I’m going to sit idly by and let some
obnoxious, loud-mouths on the left…led by Nevada’s #2 liberal
blogger-with-a-taxpayer-
Mrs. Dooling doesn’t deserve to be treated this way.
What she does deserve are some emails of support to
counter-balance the hate-mail she’s getting from the left. Why not send her one right now?
You can read this column online, as well as access archives
of past Muth's Truths columns by clicking here... www.MuthsTruths.com
Did someone forward you this copy of Muth's Truths?
Get your own FREE subscription...  |
No comments:
Post a Comment