Goofs and Goons Law
Way Overdue
Chuck
Muth
April
9, 2015
A couple
from California was visiting Las Vegas.
They walked near a union picket line in front of the then-Frontier
Hotel. Crazed picketers launched into a
verbal assault on the couple.
When the
woman took offense, she was punched in the face. When her husband came to her defense, he had
a beer mugged smashed across his skull.
At
the time, Metro called the incident a “beating.”
Union
goons called it “free speech.”
I
remember that strike vividly, as I operated a delivery service on the Strip at
the time and experienced similar taunting and intimidation tactics by union
thugs – though, thankfully, absent the actual beating.
Some
labor
unions, to this day, conduct similar “protests” against Nevada
businesses
that won’t bow to their will and succumb to their demands. Threats are
made. “Fightin’ words” are hurled at customers. Property is damaged.
Business and traffic is ground to a halt as chanting,
zombie-like picketers clog public sidewalks and streets.
All
in the name of the union’s free speech “rights.”
But
it is a generally-accepted concept in this country that one person’s rights end
where another person’s begin. And free
speech can be constitutionally limited.
As we all know, you can’t yell “fire” in a crowded theater unless there’s
actually a fire.
To
that end, Assemblywoman Michele Fiore (R-Las Vegas) has introduced a bill
(AB356) that, while preserving a union member’s free speech rights, imposes
consequences on goofs and goons when they go too far in “mass picketing.”
In
testimony introducing the bill, Fiore explained that AB356 “disallows a person
from damaging, injuring, harming, threatening, or maliciously disrupting the
lawful conduct of a business.” It also “specifically
does not allow for disrupting traffic or using the public right of way to
interfere with a business.”
Additionally,
the bill “would not allow threatening language to be used against customers
that are entering a business” or “allow the demonstrators to abuse customers
that are entering a business that is being demonstrated against.”
And
since law enforcement traditionally uses the ol’ “catch and release” method for
dealing with such tactics - and refuses
to curb “speech” designed “to intimidate, bully or threaten a customer of a
business,” destroys property, and/or blocks traffic - AB356 would allow businesses
to sue individuals who go too far in civil court.
While
AB356 would clearly act as a curb to many of the more outrageous intimidation
tactics of organized labor, it just as clearly would apply to other groups, as
well – such as the “Occupy Wall Street” gadflies who did significant property
damage during their “protests” a couple years ago.
Fiore’s
“Goofs and Goons” deterrent bill is long overdue, much needed, and
constitutionally permissible. So let it
be written; so let it be done.
You can read this column online, as well as access archives
of past Muth's Truths columns by clicking here... www.MuthsTruths.com |
No comments:
Post a Comment