Dear Conservatives,
With or without Keystone XL, the Canadian oil sands will continue to be developed.
At the American Energy Alliance we have been saying this
for years, but the environmental left has refused to acknowledge basic
economics.
Global demand for crude oil is simply too high for it
not to be developed, regardless of whether or not it comes through the
U.S. by pipeline.
But by denying Keystone XL, we are missing out on
the opportunity to improve the American economy and strengthen our
country’s energy infrastructure.
In a recent article at Forbes by Robert Bradley Jr. who
is the founder of our sister organization, the Institute for Energy
Research, our predictions were confirmed.
As Bradley writes in the article, TransCanada has
announced plans to create an alternative to Keystone XL that lies
entirely within Canada’s borders.
The pipeline would transport crude from Alberta’s oil sands to Canada’s east coast and then ship it to buyers across the globe.
Green activists will tout this as a victory against Keystone, but the victory is only symbolic.
For years environmentalists argued the myth that
Keystone XL would increase carbon emissions by encouraging the
production of crude from Alberta’s oil sands.
But as we’ve stated above, Canadian oil sands were going to be developed whether Keystone is completed or not.
In reality, all these green activists have accomplished is the denial of 42,000 new jobs and numerous economic benefits in the U.S.
But there is still time!
The Obama administration recently pushed their final
decision on Keystone until after the upcoming midterm elections, and if
approved, we still have a chance to reap the benefits from Alberta’s oil
resources.
With your help we can continue to build support for the Keystone pipeline.
With public opinion on our side, Obama will have no choice but to approve Keystone XL.
Click HERE to read Rob Bradley’s full article in Forbes.
Sincerely,
Tom Pyle
President |
No comments:
Post a Comment