Thursday, March 6, 2014

CONSERVATIVE ARTICLES 03/05/2014


National MiddleClass Network DAILY NewsBriefer - 3-5-14
Note: This is a "DAILY" Newsbriefer. "If you DON'T see one DAILY, say something". THX


And don't forget the newsbrief at the bottom...    "natural born citizen"




(St. Louis Post-Dipatch) The father thinks it's the adults who are acting childish ...

From: ORYR

From: ORYR

BJ3: And as our 3-tier poll formula still shows, his AP is closer to 30-35%.

BJ3: Huh???

BJ3: Huh?......Huh?

From: CommieBlaster...CT Gunowners Refuse to Comply    http://moonbattery.com/?p=43007

From: CommieBlaster...As World Order Implodes, Obama Promises to Act... Against Israel... Americans' Support for Israel at All Time High    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/03/03/Obama-promises-to-act-against-israel

Fed-up orthodontist challenges Obama

8 years and $100 million for solution to fatal flaw


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/#qmP6rmX41qs1jOBk.99
Cops opt for 'the fix' after mom's puzzling death
8 years and $100 million for solution to fatal flaw
Regime Plans Another Obamacare Delay
RUSH: The Regime "is set to announce another major delay in implementing the Affordable Care Act, easing election pressure on Democrats..." They're not even bothering to hide the purpose of this.  Listen Now (Members Only)     Read Transcript
What If Supreme Court Justices Debated on TV? http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2014/03/04/what_if_supreme_court_justices_debated_on_tv   March 04, 2014
RUSH:  I want you to think what would happen if after every Supreme Court decision, say three or four Supreme Court justices showed up on Fox News to debate Bob Beckel and Juan Williams and whoever. Imagine what we would end up thinking of them. Listen Now (Members Only)       Read Transcript
From: Victoria Baer - The Baer Edge
President Obama is resuming his push for stronger gun control, following a year that saw his hopes for more stringent federal regulations dashed.      The president’s fiscal 2015 budget request contains a renewed focus on gun control, including calls for improved background checks by the FBI, better data via the National Criminal History Improvement Program and inspections of firearms dealers, according to a synopsis released by the White House.    LINK

From: sherzieve   From: "Dave Hollenbeck"
HOW SOON UNTIL OBAMACARE IS SEEN AS A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY?   http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/5788/130/
Each day brings new reports of seriously ill patients losing their doctors; financially struggling families socked with huge health insurance premium increases; workers who've had their hours cut back or lost jobs because of Obamacare. LINK

From: sherzieve...The Luciferians have begun to declare themselves...From: "Dave Hollenbeck"
HOW MUCH OF OUR GOVERNMENT IS SIMPLY LEGALIZED CORRUPTION?   http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/5789/151/   by Richard Rahn
If a politician or government official takes a direct monetary bribe for granting a favor or sweetheart contract, do you think he should be sent to prison?      LINK
BJ3: For 6 years now, we've been repeating to "everyone" that the espoused definition of "natural born citizen" is nowhere near in the bag. Most people seem to get that. Some adamantly won't.  
   Well, if you don't get it now, you never will. In the column below, by HUGELY respected Sharon Rondeau, it states: "It is generally understood by most Americans that a “natural born Citizen” is one born in the United States. Historically, the citizenship of the parents was at least equally important to the person’s birthplace to assign “natural born” status. Zullo and Gallups have previously stated that the question regarding Obama is whether or not he is even a U.S. citizen at all."   So let's try one more time, "it is generally understood" and "Historically" will absolutely not cut it.
To the point, what Mike and Carl say is infinitely easier to address and verify, at the least. 
   Baseline, a "citizen" is any one of those we've all heard: born in the USA (such as the SCOTUS-ruled Wong Kim Ark), born of a citizen parent (USA-born or naturalized), born of two citizen parents.
   Which then would be the "least' requirement for "citizen" status? To many, it seems to be "born of one citizen parent, no matter where". Any dissenters? The problem is that "experts" such as former Judge Napolitano, Sean Hannity and others claim that to be POTUS-eligible, "natural born citizen".
   To us, The Written Word and The Law are clear..."natural-born" citizen needs be "something more" than the absolute, rock-bottom minimum. So, for largest unity, we're "OK" with any of the "mores".
   However, no matter what the definition (which NEEDS to be in place by the righteous time), there MUST be valid, rightly-certified, etc. birth documentation to satisfy it or not. To date, there isn't any.  
   Any dissenters? NO, you can't go by what he says as he did not witness his own conception or birth.
   So, why not ride with Mike and Carl? "Citizen" is the least difficult to satisfy and requires the same documented proof as "NBC" (while not conceding POTUS eligiblity). As such, any refusal has a far deeper, negative, public perception. Let's hear what you think.  THX
From: Joan Swirsky
Video at link and on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=200kyOZw5nU

No comments:

Post a Comment