 Bible Belt Won't Buckle on Marriage
After watching from a
distance as the marriage debate ignited out west, Oklahomans were
horrified yesterday to see the battle march directly into their
backyards. From Tulsa to Tipton, the news dropped like a bombshell,
stunning the million-plus voters who'd exercised what they thought was
their constitutional right to define marriage. Under the 68-page opinion
of a single judge, that right no longer exists for Sooners. Like New
Jersey, New Mexico, and Utah before them, Oklahomans are feeling the
deep betrayal of a judicial system overrun by political activists. In a
country where lawlessness is more contagious than the common cold, U.S.
District Judge Terence Kern smothered the votes of 76% of the state and
substituted his judgment for that of 1,075,216 Oklahomans.
Kern, a Clinton-appointee,
even stuck it to the U.S. Supreme Court in his ruling, implying that the
justices dodged the hard questions in their June marriage decision. In
reality, the Court couldn't have been clearer: "No one questions the
power of the states to define marriage." Unfortunately, that didn't stop
Kern from unleashing his warped ideology on one of the most
conservative states in the country. The marriage amendment, he claims,
is "an arbitrary, irrational, exclusion of just one class ofOklahoma
citizens from a governmental benefit... It is also insulting to same-sex
couples, who are human beings capable of forming loving, committed,
enduring relationships."
No one questions homosexuals' ability to form loving relationships.
What they question is whether Americans should be forced to finance,
sanction, and elevate unions that not only obliterate free speech and
religious liberty but also deny children a mom and a dad. Kern's opinion (which is exactly that -- his
opinion), demands that "the majority view in Oklahoma give way" to a
vocal and intolerant minority. After neutering the voters of an
overwhelming number of Sooners, Kern did have sense enough to postpone
any same-sex "weddings" until the state can appeal to the 10th Circuit Court (the same bench hearing Utah's case).
And based on the flood of
outraged press releases, state leaders are already gearing up for an
epic battle. Governor Mary Fallin (R) was one of the first out of the
gate, blasting the judge for exalt himself above the democratic process.
"The people of Oklahoma have spoken on this issue. I support the right
of Oklahoma's voters to govern themselves on this and other policy
matters. I am disappointed in the judge's ruling and troubled that the
will of the people has once against been ignored by the federal
government." Attorney General Scott Pruitt wasn't far behind, warning
Kern that his decision openly defied the Supreme Court. "This is why the
American people are so frustrated with government and government
officials," said Rep. James Lankford (R-Okla.). "The people speak clearly but elected officials and judges ignore them."
For most Americans, these
decisions have as much to do with preserving representative democracy as
marriage. "Our Constitution protects the sovereignty of states," fumed Rep. Markwayne
Mullin, "and with today's ruling, that right has clearly been
violated." Unfortunately, these attacks are just the beginning of
runaway courts -- thanks, in large part, to new Senate rules
that are being used to ram these types of black-robed tyrants through
the confirmation process. Under Sen. Harry Reid's (D-Nev.) Wild West
confirmation process, the bench isn't big enough for all the judicial
tyrants sailing through unopposed. With a new same-sex "marriage"
lawsuit filed every week, the Senate's rules are already feeding the
unrest across America.
"The State Constitution overrides a federal judge's personal opinion," Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-Okla.) said.
But it will take a powerful reminder -- the likes of Rep. Randy Weber's
State Marriage Defense Act -- to put these judges in their place. By
driving these lawsuits into the deepest conservative states, the Left's
biggest goal is demoralizing the heart of our movement. But if it's
indifference liberals are counting on, they just picked a fight with the
wrong voters. For more on how Weber's federal bill would keep outsiders
from trespassing on your state's laws, click over to FRC's Cathy Ruse's
new op-ed in the Washington Times. Then, contact your congressman
and ask him to sign on to the State Marriage Defense Act -- and help
put an end to Government of the courts, by the courts, and for the
courts.
Life after Death Roe Today
at a lecture here at FRC headquarters, I had the privilege of
introducing two of America's greatest champions for the unborn and their
mothers, U.S. Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) and FRC's own Dr. Pat Fagan.
Barack Obama is "the abortion President," Rep. Smith said during his
remarks. Unfortunately, he's right. As he noted, President Obama has
appointed leading pro-abortion advocates in many senior positions in his
administration. And as Rep. Smith also commented, ObamaCare clearly
underwrites and encourages abortion-on-demand, despite the President's
previous assurances it wouldn't. But "you have to be Sherlock Holmes,"
Smith half-joked, to find out which health plans fund abortion.
The good news is that Rep.
Smith and his pro-life allies in Congress are fighting back on behalf of
the unborn and their mothers. With about 100 other House members, he's
introduced "The No Taxpayer Funding of Abortion Act" in the House
(pro-life ally Senator Roger Wicker, R-Miss., is offering a companion
bill in the Senate) which would take direct aim at the abortion
industry's cushy deal with taxpayers. In federal programs and agencies,
H.R. 7 would pull out government abortion funding by the roots. During
his remarks at FRC, Rep. Smith also said that in recent years, more than
200 pro-life bills have been passed at the state level, and that the
tide of opinion among young people is shifting from opposition to
support for protecting the unborn and their mothers. He closed by urging
us never to give up defending life -- and Congressman, FRC and our
friends never will.
Congressman Smith was
followed by FRC's own Dr. Pat Fagan, director of our Marriage and
Religion Research Institute, who released the findings of a major review
of federal data concerning the frequency of abortion and among what
sectors of our society it most often occurs. Based on his findings, Dr.
Fagan noted that by the end of their fertile years (mid-forties)
somewhat close to 80 percent of women who have ever been pregnant report
never having an abortion. Check out the media coverage in CNSNews.com and the D.C. Examiner. And if you missed the lecture, click on the video below.
Tony Perkins' Washington Update is written with the aid of FRC senior writers.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment