Friday DigestTHE FOUNDATION
"And can the liberties of a
nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a
conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift
of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" --Thomas
Jefferson (1781)
CULTURE, SCIENCE & FAITH'So Help Me God,' MaybeClearly, Weinstein and the MRFF are dedicated to freedom from religion, not our constitutionally enshrined freedom of religion. But not a single mainstream media report has been filed on a much bigger issue than the Honor Oath. As first noted by Alexander in May of this year, there are two more important oaths in the official Air Force handbook, the Officer and Cadet oaths, and "So help me God" has already been removed from those oaths. It was removed in 2011 and remains absent in the 2012 and 2013 handbooks. (Click to View) As of yet, there has been no explanation from the Air Force, but the removals are in apparent violation of both federal law (5 U.S.C. § 3331) and the most recent directives from the Secretary of the Air Force. It is already understood that repeating "So help me God" is elective in military and civilian oaths, as the higher laws in the matter of oaths falls under our Constitution's Article VI prohibition of any religious test for public office. However, it is no longer elective in the AFA Cadet and Officer oaths because the words have already been omitted!
There is no chance that these
removals are "accidental," and any military officers who approved the
oath alterations could be subject to prosecution under the Uniform Code
of Military Justice, Article 92 (IX), "Violation of a Lawful General
Regulation/Order."
This week, Pulitzer Prize-winning writer Mark Thompson posted an
op/ed in Time Magazine on the "So help me God" issue. Thompson's
Pulitzer was earned for a series he wrote that lead to enhanced military
helicopter safety. Clearly it was not earned for his limited knowledge
of military oaths.Thompson asserted, "The formal American embrace of religion in civic government is a fairly recent phenomenon: 'Under God' was added to the Pledge of Allegiance in 1954. 'In God We Trust' became the nation's official motto in 1956. In 1957, 'In God We Trust' was added to U.S. paper currency." He got the dates partially right, but the assertion that the references to "God" are a "recent phenomenon" is patently incorrect. The most formative words in our nation's most historic document, the Declaration of Independence, assert that Liberty is "endowed by their Creator," not the gift of man, as Barack Obama and his Leftist cadres assert today. The words "So help me God" were prescribed in oaths as early as the Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789. But five months earlier, George Washington elected to use those words in conclusion to the first oath of office as president.
Invoking faith was a common
theme for Washington and most other founders, as in these words from
Washington's farewell address in 1796: "Of all the dispositions and
habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are
indispensible supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of
Patriotism who should labor to subvert these great Pillars of human
happiness - these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. ...
Let it simply be asked where is the security for property, for
reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the
oaths..."
The words "In God we trust" first appeared on U.S. coins in 1864,
long before it was added to currency in 1957. And one of the earliest
references to "In God We Trust" was in the last verse of our National
Anthem, "The Star-Spangled Banner." During the War of 1812, Francis
Scott Key penned the words, "And this be our motto: 'In God is our
trust,'" after witnessing the bombardment of Fort McHenry in 1814.Regarding the current controversy over the AFA Officer and Cadet oaths, a Freedom of Information Act inquiry is being processed to determine who removed the words "So help me God," and why. GOVERNMENT & POLITICSObama Apologizes? Not Really.As of this week, at least 3.5 million Americans received notice that they will be dumped from their current insurance plans because those plans don't meet the minimum requirements of ObamaCare. The president promised repeatedly that this wouldn't happen, but it's reality and it's just the beginning. Finally, however, that reality led to this curiosity: "I am sorry that [people who've lost their insurance] are finding themselves in this situation based on assurances they got from me." An apology? Charles C.W. Cook observed, "This president doesn't just come out and apologize. The Democratic lawmakers that met with him this week must have given him one hell of a dressing down." And David Harsanyi quipped, "I'd rather have an apology for all the promises he kept." Well, it wasn't really an apology. He also said, "Well, first of all, I meant what I said [about keeping your plan]. And we worked hard to try to make sure that we implemented it properly. But obviously, we didn't do enough -- a good enough job -- and I regret that. We're talking about 5% of the population who are in what's called the individual market. They're out there buying health insurance on their own. A lot of these plans are subpar plans. And we put in a clause in the law that said if you had one of those plans, even if it was subpar ... you could keep it. ... [But] even though it only affects a small amount of the population, you know, it means a lot to them, obviously, when they get this letter cancelled [sic]." So he's "sorry" that his "assurances" put people in a predicament. But it wasn't his assurances; it was his actions. And even so, he's not sorry because those paltry few million people had lousy plans anyway. Even if it were real, Obama's pathetic and narcissistic pseudo-apology is worthless. The unlucky millions of Americans who have been kicked off their perfectly suitable plans will quickly discover, as many already have, that new insurance will cost more because of its comprehensiveness -- the only virtue that matters to Obama. Studies estimate that insurance premiums will increase by anywhere from 99% to 250% in 45 states, with men and women below the age of 30 facing the brunt of the damage. There's also a slew of new taxes and surcharges on medical devices, drugs, and health spending accounts that will further drive up the cost of insurance for everyone. Congressional Republicans have been warning about these problems all along, and largely to no avail. As their holiday break approaches, the leadership has decided to remain silent as all these problems become public and ObamaCare makes the case against itself. Not surprisingly, this epic debacle has caused panic among the congressional Democrats who risked their political futures to support ObamaCare. May their creation hang like an albatross around their necks in 2014 and beyond. Your Support Means a Great DealFellow Patriots, as we continue our fight for Essential Liberty, we humbly request your support for our 2013 Year-End Campaign. Your generosity and commitment have made it possible to offer The Patriot Post without a subscription fee. We're also able to authorize the free redistribution and reprinting of our publication through various academic, media and political outlets and forums, thus reaching a very large audience. After all, our weekly editions are what you've come to rely on for the best conservative news and analysis on the Web.As with other mission-based, donor-supported organizations, we raise most of our budget in the last two months of each year. As of this morning, we still must raise approximately $316,800 before year's end. Please note that our budget has not increased this year.
ECONOMY, REGS & TAXESOctober Jobs Report: What Shutdown?The bad news is that the headline unemployment rate ticked up a notch to 7.3%, and the greater U-6 measure rose from 13.6% to 13.8%. And NBC reports, "The civilian labor force tumbled by 720,000 and the labor force participation rate fell to [62.8%], its lowest since March 1978." Many of the jobs created were also in retail, which means part-time with little or no benefits. GDP growth, on the other hand, offered more good news. The economy grew by 2.8% in the third quarter. Four years after the recession "officially" ended, we're finally seeing marginally respectable growth. Imagine what the recovery could have been without massive government spending and ObamaCare. NATIONAL SECURITYMissile Defense in Romania, and the Russians Don't Like ItJust the same, Russia is promising to deploy its own S-400 and S-500 anti-aircraft and missile technology in response to the U.S.-Romanian system. It's a political move that Russia is hoping will spur the U.S. to limit or cancel its plans, and it has worked in the past. The U.S. under Obama has cancelled or severely reduced anti-missile defense plans before -- most notably in Poland, which was a slap in the face to our allies there. This new system is scheduled to go online in 2015, but it's difficult to know if that will actually happen. Russia has worked in recent years to re-establish a sphere of influence in Eastern Europe, and Barack Obama's weak-kneed foreign policy has allowed them to do it. And perhaps the "flexibility" he promised the Russians upon his re-election means that he'll cave once again. Marine Corps BirthdaySunday marks the 238th birthday of the United States Marine Corps. On Nov. 10, 1775, the Second Continental Congress resolved to create two battalions of Continental Marines for the War of Independence from Britain. In 1798, President John Adams signed the Act establishing the United States Marine Corps. The 13th Commandant of the Marine Corps, General John A. Lejeune, issued Marine Corps Order No. 47, Series 1921, directing that on Nov. 10 every year, in honor of the Corps' birthday, the Order's summary of the history, mission and tradition of the Corps be read to every command.We at The Patriot Post offer our thanks for a job well done. For those interested in great items bearing the Marine Corps' insignia, please visit The Patriot Post Shop. Semper Fi! BRIEF OPINIONEssential Liberty
Columnist John Stossel: "Some
things ought to be done by government: things like running courts,
policing pollution and protecting the border. But most everything else
should be left to private actors. Government offers guarantees on paper
and promises in speeches. But government rarely delivers. Private
companies did brilliant Internet work for President Obama's election
campaign. But when it came to his health insurance website, the
president put government in charge. We saw the result. Markets aren't
perfect, but they allow for a world where prudence is rewarded and sloth
punished, a world in which more people take risks and innovate. That's a
world where people prosper. Some prosper instead of waiting -- and
sometimes dying -- while hoping government will eventually get things
right."
Political Futures
Columnist Jeff Jacoby: "If
Obama were the CEO of a private company, writes George Mason University
economist Don Boudreaux, 'he would be sued, publicly lambasted by all
the major media, perhaps hauled before an admittedly grandstanding
Congressional committee, and possibly prosecuted, convicted, fined, or
even imprisoned for fraudulent misrepresentation.' But politics isn't
the marketplace, and politicians are held to a different standard. We
entrust elected officials with far too much power, then routinely fail
to hold them accountable when they abuse their power and betray that
trust. Ultimately the only solution to the problem of faithless
politicians is to put less faith in politicians. For as government gets
bigger, citizens get smaller -- and public servants become impossible to
control."
Faith and Family
Columnist Dennis Prager: "For
at least two generations, countless conservative parents have seen their
adult children reject their core values. ... [M]ost parents with
traditional American and Judeo-Christian values have not thought it
necessary to articulate these values to their children on a regular
basis. They assumed that there was no need to because that was true for
much of American history, when the society at large held those values.
... [O]ne of the founders of progressivism in America, Woodrow Wilson,
... said in a speech in 1914, 'I have often said that the use of a
university is to make young gentlemen as unlike their fathers as
possible.' Eighty-eight years later, the president of Dartmouth College,
James O. Freedman, echoed Wilson: 'The purpose of a college education
is to question your father's values,' he told the graduating seniors of
Dartmouth College. Even now, too few conservative parents realize how
radical -- and effective -- the university agenda is."
For more, visit The Right Opinion.CHRONICLE QUOTESUpright
Commentator Charles
Krauthammer: "The president now is toxic. The thing is called ObamaCare.
There's no running away from it. It's got his name on it. You see the
president, you think about the policy and you know it's a disaster."
Demo-gogues
Barack Obama: "Nothing drives
me more crazy than the fact that right now, there is great insurance to
be had out there, choice and competition, where people can save money
for a better product, except too many folks have not been able to get
through the website. Now, this is like having a really good product in
the store and the cash registers don't work and there aren't enough
parking spots and nobody can get through the door. So we are working
overtime to get this fixed."
Village Idiots
Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services director Marilyn Tavenner: "[The '5%' of Americans
receiving insurance termination notices] can choose a different plan
being offered by their insurer or they can shop for coverage in the
marketplace or outside the marketplace. As insurers have made clear,
they are not dropping consumers; they're improving their coverage
options, often offering better-value plans with additional benefits."
The BIG Lie
White House Press Secretary Jay
Carney: "Immigration reform will reduce the deficit by $850 billion
over the first 20 years. It's good for the economy and the right thing
to do. We hope the House will follow the Senate and take action."
Braying Jackass
ESPN analyst Kevin Blackistone:
"When you have military flyovers and the military symbolism that goes
on in sports, I think you've got a problem."
He also criticized singing the "war anthem" before games, by which he meant the national anthem.
Dezinformatsia
MSNBC's Ed Schultz: "[W]hat do
Christian values mean to Republicans? It's just a stepping stone, a
footstool, to get exactly what they want in the political arena. They
hide behind their plastic Jesus, quite often."
From the 'Non Compos Mentis' File
Texas Democrat candidate for
governor Wendy Davis: "I am pro-life, I care about the life of every
child. ... I care about life and I have a record of fighting for people
above all else."
Of course, the new political star in the Lonestar State rocketed to fame for filibustering a bill to save
the lives of babies older than 20 weeks gestation in the womb. And,
after criticizing those who would seek political gain through abortion,
she is now redefining the term "pro-life" for her own social justice
ends.
Alpha Jackass
Activist Dan Savage: "There's
too many Godd--- people on the planet. You know, I'm pro-choice, I
believe that women should have a right to control their bodies.
Sometimes in my darker moments, I'm anti-choice. I think abortion should
be mandatory for about 30 years."
Short Cuts
Comedian Jay Leno: "According
to a new study out of Harvard, it is easier for people to be moral in
the morning. They say people are more moral at the beginning of the day,
but they become more dishonest as the day goes on. So when people say
Congress is as dishonest as the day is long, we now have scientific
proof."
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team
Join us in daily prayer for our
Patriots in uniform -- Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Coast
Guardsmen -- standing in harm's way in defense of Liberty, and for their
families.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment