SECRETARY HAGEL WANT TO 'TRIM' MILITARY PAY!
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel warned Tuesday that troops and their families will be asked to sacrifice on pay and benefits to preserve readiness in an era of tighter budgets.
Hagel listed politically-charged changes to compensation and personnel policy
as one of his top six priorities in reforming the military following
the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as the department gears up to meet new
challenges.
"This may be the most difficult" to achieve among his six
priorities, Hagel said of proposals to trim pay increases, overhaul
TRICARE and review retirement benefits while adapting to cuts in
personnel."Without serious attempts to achieve significant savings in this area, which consumes roughly half of the DoD budget and is increasing every year, we risk becoming an unbalanced force," Hagel said.
The
alternative was to have a military that is "well-compensated, but
poorly trained and equipped, with limited readiness and capability,"
Hagel said in a keynote address to a Global Security Forum 2013
sponsored by the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Hagel acknowledged the need to get approval for changes to compensation
and personnel policy from members of Congress, who would be reluctant
to justify military pay cuts to voters back home.
At
a CSIS panel on defense budgets following Hagel's address, Jim Dyer,
former staff director for the House Appropriations Committee, said he
saw "no movement on pay, or to address TRICARE costs" in the current
political environment.
"Congress is not there on this
yet," Dyer said. "They're too determined not to hurt the troops," or
their own chances for re-election, Dyer said.
In
his 35-minute speech , Hagel said his strategic vision for the
department's future constantly had to be balanced against the
uncertainty of funding. The overall goal, given the political gridlock
in Congress, involved a tradeoff on shrinking the size of the military
to maintain investments in new weapons and cyberwarfare capabilities,
Hagel said.
"Destructive technologies and
weapons that were once the province of advanced militaries are being
sought by non-state actors and other nations," Hagel said. "This will
require our continued investment in cutting-edge defensive space and
cyber technologies, and capabilities like missile defense, as well as
offensive technologies and capabilities to deter aggressors and respond
if we must.".
The degree
of difficulty in the task increased exponentially under the budget
cuts, Hagel said. The Defense Department is "currently facing
sequester-level cuts on the order of $500 billion over 10 years. This is
in addition to the ten-year, $487 billion reduction in DoD's budget
that is already underway."
"These cuts are too fast, too much, too abrupt, and too irresponsible," Hagel said. "DoD took a $37 billion sequester cut during the past fiscal year, and we could be forced to absorb a $52 billion sequester cut this fiscal year."
"These cuts are too fast, too much, too abrupt, and too irresponsible," Hagel said. "DoD took a $37 billion sequester cut during the past fiscal year, and we could be forced to absorb a $52 billion sequester cut this fiscal year."
Yet, Hagel said he remained
committed to his six priorities "for our budget and strategic planning
efforts going forward" -- institutional reform, force planning,
readiness, investments in emerging capabilities, balancing capacity and
capability, and balancing personnel responsibilities with a
sustainable compensation policy.
Hagel also echoed the themes of
former Defense Secretary Robert Gates and former Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton, who reached a consensus on foreign policy that
combined the soft power of diplomacy and development with the hard
power of the military to achieve what they termed "smart power." Hagel
said
"We will need to place more of an emphasis on civilian instruments of power," Hagel said
No comments:
Post a Comment