DAILY FLOOR WRAP UP
August 1, 2013
SUMMARY OF LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS
H.R. 1582 - Energy Consumers Relief Act
Woodall (R-GA) Amendment No. 4 – Requires EPA to make publicly available all data and documents relied upon by the Agency
to develop estimates under the bill. – ADOPTED BY VOICE
Culberson (R-TX) and Hunter (R-CA)
- Prohibits the EPA from using the "social cost of carbon" formula in
its benefits
assessment of any energy-related rule that is estimated to cost more
than $1 billion until the EPA promulgates a final rule on the social
cost of carbon. –
NOT OFFERED
Waxman (D-CA)
Amendment No. 1 – Strikes section 2 of the bill, which allows DOE to effectively veto EPA rules. –
REJECTED 183 – 230
Connolly (D-VA) and Kildee (D-MI) Amendment No. 3 – Prevents Sec. 2 of the bill from applying to rules related to protecting
air and water quality. – REJECTED 182 – 224
Murphy (R-PA) Amendment No. 6– Prohibits the EPA from using the "social cost of carbon" valuation for any energy-related
rule covered by this bill. – ADOPTED 234 – 178
Democrat Motion to Recommit –
FAILED 188 – 221
Final Passage of
H.R. 1582 — "To protect consumers by
prohibiting the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
from promulgating as final certain energy-related rules that are
estimated to cost more
than $1 billion and will cause significant adverse effects to the
economy." –
PASSED 232 – 181
Ordering the Previous Question on
H. Res. 322 — "Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 367)
to amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that
major rules of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless
a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law; providing for
consideration of the bill (H.R.
2009) to prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from enforcing
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010; providing for proceedings during
the period from August 3, 2013, through September
6, 2013; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2879) to
provide limitations on bonuses for Federal employees during
sequestration, to provide for investigative leave requirements for
members of the Senior Executive Service, to establish certain
procedures for conducting in-person or telephonic interactions by
Executive branch employees with individuals, and for other purposes." –
ADOPTED 222 – 191
H. Res. 322 —
"Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 367)
to amend
chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that major rules
of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless a joint
resolution of approval is enacted into law; providing for consideration
of the bill (H.R.
2009) to prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from enforcing
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010; providing for proceedings during
the period from August 3, 2013, through September
6, 2013; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2879) to
provide limitations on bonuses for Federal employees during
sequestration, to provide for investigative leave requirements for
members of the Senior Executive Service, to establish certain
procedures for conducting in-person or telephonic interactions by
Executive branch employees with individuals, and for other purposes." –
ADOPTED 223 – 189
H.R. 1897
— "To promote freedom and democracy in Vietnam." – ON THE MOTION TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND PASS THE BILL –
PASSED 405 – 3
H.R. 2879 - Stop Government Abuse Act
Final Passage of
H.R. 2879 — "To provide limitations on
bonuses for Federal employees during sequestration, to provide for
investigative leave requirements for members of the Senior Executive
Service, to establish
certain procedures for conducting in-person or telephonic interactions
by Executive branch employees with individuals, and for other purposes."
–
PASSED 239 – 176
H.R. 367
- Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013
Scalise (R-LA) Amendment No.1 - Requires the Administration to receive approval from Congress before implementing a carbon
tax. – VOTE REQUESTED
Davis (R-IL), Peterson (D-MN)
Amendment No.2 - Adds a to the definition of what constitutes a “major
rule” to include
any interim final rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) that would have a significant impact on a substantial amount of
agricultural entities (as determined by the Secretary of Agriculture). –
ADOPTED BY VOICE
Smith (R-MO) Amendment No.3 - Requires congressional approval for all rules under the authority of the Affordable Care
Act. – VOTE REQUESTED
Latham (R-IA)
Amendment No.4 - Clarifies that the report required to be submitted to
Congress by Federal agencies promulgating
a rule under the Act, must include a list of any other related
regulatory actions taken by or that will be taken by any other Federal
agency with authority to implement the same statutory provision or
regulatory objective. –
VOTE REQUESTED
Sessions (R-TX), Davis (R-IL), Barr, (R-KY), Wenstrup (R-OH), Coffman (R-CO)
Amendment No.5 Requires the agency submitting
the report on a proposed Federal rule to include an assessment, as part
of the cost-benefit analysis submitted to the Comptroller General and
each House of Congress, of anticipated jobs gained or lost as a result
of implementation, and to specify whether those
jobs will come from the public or private sector. – ADOPTED BY VOICE
Nadler (D-NY)
Amendment No.6 Exempts from the bill's congressional approval
requirement any rule pertaining to nuclear
reactor safety standards in order to prevent nuclear meltdowns like the
one in Fukushima. The amendment would ensure enhanced nuclear safety
protection requirements can go into effect. –
VOTE REQUESTED
Johnson, Hank (D-GA) Amendment No.7 Exempts from the provisions of the bill any rule that the Office of Management and
Budget determines would result in net job creation. – VOTE REQUESTED
Jackson Lee (D-TX) Amendment No.8 Exempts from the bill's congressional approval requirement any rule promulgated by the
Department of Homeland Security. – VOTE REQUESTED
McKinley (R-WV) Amendment No.9 Reduces the annual effect on the economy of the term ‘major rule’ from $100 million or
more to $50 million or more. – ADOPTED BY VOICE
Cole (R-OK) Amendment No.10 Ensures that the impact on Tribal government agencies would be included in the determination
of whether a rule constitutes a major rule. – NOT OFFERED
Webster (R-FL)
Amendment No.11 Prevents federal agencies from implementing significant
policy changes without appropriate
congressional review. Brings administrative rules having an economic
impact of $100 million or more as scored by the Office of Management and
Budget before Congress for a vote. –
ADOPTED BY VOICE
Moore, Gwen (D-WI) Amendment No.12 Exempts rules pertaining to veterans from the additional requirements of this Act.
– VOTE REQUESTED
No comments:
Post a Comment