WHY THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA (BSA) ARE UNDER ATTACK

Submitted by: Donald Hank

These are quotes from "Marriage Equality" activists in their own words.  Note that they are not really advocating for marriage.  These activists openly admit that "Marriage Equality" is really a Trojan horse for the DESTRUCTION of the family as an institution, which has been collectivist objective since the formation of the Fabian Socialist Society in the early 20th Century.

1)  "Opting out of marriage altogether will provide a quicker path to progress, as only the death of marriage can bring about the dawn of equality for all."

-- Dr Meagan Tyler, is a Marxist Lecturer in Sociology at Victoria University. She is the author of 'Selling Sex Short: The pornographic and sexological construction of women's sexuality in the West' (2011, Cambridge Scholars).

2)  A middle ground might be to fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely, to demand the right to marry not as a way of adhering to society's moral codes but rather to ... radically alter an archaic institution. [Legalizing "same-sex marriage"] is also a chance to wholly transform the definition of family in American culture. It is the final tool with which to dismantle........."

-- Michelangelo Signorile, Homosexual Activist
OUT Magazine, December/January 1994 

3)  "And after all, we are advocating the destruction of the centrality of marriage and the nuclear family unit."

-- Ryan Conrad, Homosexual Activist

4) "Wouldn't marriage's death as a state institution, including for straight people, be the best solution? By all means let people 'commit', in front of priests or otherwise, but leave weddings as ceremonies with no legal status. Scrap the civil register; make no distinction in the state's eyes between married and unmarried citizens. The British Humanist Association, a key supporter of C4EM, seeks legal recognition for marriages its celebrants perform, but secularism is about ending, not emulating, certain belief sets' privilege."

-- Alex Gabriel, Homosexual Blogger, Politics.co.uk

5)  "Marriage is the proverbial burning building.  Instead of pounding on the door to be let in... queers should be stoking the flames!"

-- National Conference on Organized Resistance

6)  "That is why any reforms we might painfully exact from our rulers would only be fragile and vulnerable; that is why we, along with the women's movement, must fight for something more than reform. We must aim at the abolition of the family, so that the sexist, male supremacist system can no longer be nurtured there."

-- Gay Liberation Front: Manifesto, 1978

7)   "... fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there-because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don't think it should exist."

-- Masha Gessen, Homosexual Journalist 

Jim Komaniecki,
Presidentwww.RestoreAmericanLiberty.com, INC.

Defending Freedom, Judeo-Christian Values
and Conservative Principles

 BSA: the real struggle is over OPEN LGBT agitation w/in BSA

The LGBT assault against the BSA is yet another indicator of how
ruthless the LGBT Axis really is. This struggle illustrates how
hellbent homosexualist activists are in promoting their agenda at the
expense of innocent children.

The article below helps bring that into perspective.

More to the point: The LGBT agitators are so willing to sacrifice the
innocence of the youth because, in truth, their agenda IS THE SOCIETAL
ACCEPTANCE of the HOMOSEXUAL MASS-VICTIMIZATON OF YOUTH.

NOW we understand how signifigant the historical LGBT "tolerance" of
LAMBDA is. LAMBDA's agenda explicates the under-stated agenda of the
LGBT movement as a whole.

LAMBDA SAYS what many "mainline" LGBT agitators THINK (and what some
actually insinuate).

This insight clarifies how the banning of reparitive therapy, the
homosexualization of the military, LGBT K-12 indoctrination,
homosexual adoption, transgender legislation, etc. ALL fit that same
youth-victimization agenda.

NSL
Rabbi Noson S. Leiter
Help Rescue Our Childen


---
The Boy Scouts<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
are one of the great jewels of American culture. The success of the Boy Scouts
of America (BSA)<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
is a result in no small part of the organization's commitment to a set of

ideas and principles that have guided the program for more than 100 years.
Until recently, the BSA<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/> was unwavering in its conviction that these values and principles were"timeless."

But now those values are under attack. The Boy
Scouts<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
are
the victims of an aggressive, well-funded and relentless campaign to inject
sex and politics into Scouting. Homosexual-rights activists have
aggressively pushed a handful of top
BSA<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
leaders
to consider changing its long-standing policy of not allowing open
homosexuality in the Boy
Scouts<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>.
On Friday, the Boy
Scouts<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
offered
a resolution that caves to that outside pressure and could pass when the
national council votes on it in May.


Virtually every news story on this topic erroneously frames this issue as
the Boy Scouts<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
"bans
gays" or "discriminates against gays." This is simply not true. Contrary to
what the media might report, the Boy
Scouts<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
do
not discriminate against homosexuals. The
BSA<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
membership
application does not even ask about sexual orientation.


To make matters worse, there is a deliberate campaign of misinformation
about who the Boy Scouts of
America<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
are
and what they stand for. The media has been complicit, throwing around
cries of "discrimination" and "equal rights" following the lead of these
activists.


The great irony of this is that, while on one hand, the national media
claims Scouting bans homosexuals, on the other hand, they have been
consistently showcasing homosexuals Scouts and leaders in uniform who have
been in the program for many years, all who are claiming with a straight
face that somehow the Boy
Scouts<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
do
not allow them.


The fact is that veterans of Scouting will tell you there are currently
Scouts and adult leaders in uniform who have same-sex attractions and who
are in good standing with the program. They are discreet, though; they are
private, they are discerning, and most of all, they conduct themselves
appropriately in front of other young boys. Further, there has never been a
witch hunt in the
BSA<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/> to
find or remove its members with a same-sex attraction.


So if homosexuals are already allowed in Scouting, then what is the
national controversy about?

The real issue is this: *Homosexual-rights activists are not satisfied with
membership in good standing and being allowed to fully participate like
everyone else. They want to be able to openly promote homosexuality. They
want to promote a gay-rights political agenda. *


They want to act out publicly and be "loud and proud." They want to
inappropriately inject sex and politics into the
BSA<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
program,
where children as young as six years old are involved. Not on this dad's
watch. This behavior and open homosexual conduct is exactly what the
current BSA <http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
policy
prohibits, a prohibition that we as parents demand that the program
reaffirm if it wants our continued support.


There is nothing stopping those who do not like Scouting's stable and
time-tested membership policies from creating their own organization
without changing ours.

Changing the BSA<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
membership
policy is completely unnecessary. It solves no old problem and will only
create myriad new problems for the organization, including upending
parental control over the issues of sex and politics, forcing political
agendas on young children, and transforming the Boy
Scouts<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
into
yet another battleground for the homosexual agenda.

In February, BSA<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
National
Council leaders instructed committees to "listen to perspectives and
concerns" in the Scouting community before a vote on May 22 and 23, which
will determine whether to make a change to the existing policy.


Hearing that BSA<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
leaders
say they are in a listening mode, concerned parents, Scout leaders,
Scouting donors and Eagle Scouts from across the country have joined the
OnMyHonor.Net national coalition to say to the voting delegates of the
national council sex and politics have no place in Scouting. When it comes
to young boys, parents should have the final say, not agenda-driven
activists.


Former U.S. Rep. Richard T. Schulze, Pennsylvania Republican, a recipient
of the rare Distinguished Eagle Scout Award, recently commented, "What kind
of a message are we sending to our young people if the very leaders who are
teaching Boy Scouts<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
to
be brave cannot even find the courage to stand firm and avoid caving in to
peer pressure from Hollywood and political activists?"

I could not agree more.


We implore the delegates to the National
BSA<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/>
Convention
to affirm Scouting's current membership policy along with the principles of
the hard-fought and won 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case of
BSA<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/boy-scouts-of-america/> vs.
Dale, which protects Scouting from further legal attacks and sets the
program back on the firm foundation of principle for the future.


*John Stemberger is an Eagle Scout and president of On My Honor
(OnMyHonor.net).*


Read more:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/22/scouting-is-for-honor-not-sex-and-politics/#ixzz2RFKLZ39U