Video: New Ad DESTROYS Obama’s Sealed Records/Identity Theft
Jul 25, 2012 02:22 pm
We recognize the blatant error regarding the state Obama’s social security number was issued in, but aside from that, this is a pretty good ad! Related posts: Jeff Kuhner Blasts Obama’s Hypocrisy – Sealed Records Filling in for Michael Savage, Jeff Kuhner is just as… Sheriff Joe On Obama’s Forged Identity Records Sheriff Joe Arpaio [...]
Watch the Video and Comment: Video: New Ad DESTROYS Obama’s Sealed Records/Identity Theft
Why is Romney afraid to release his college records? He hasn't released his records either. No, Romney hasn't released his records at Harvard, or his thesis papers or his selective service records either. Romney is not a practicing attorney, so he does not have attorney records, but if he did he would HAVE to keep them secret. That is one of the requirements of client confidentiality.
ReplyDeleteRomney is an open book and Obama a 'sneak.' To ask such a foolish question as this is a desperate sign of ignorance! Pastor Lee
DeleteSo, what were Romney's grades?
ReplyDeleteBy asking for Obama's college records you imply that other presidents and presidential candidates have shown them. None of them did. Bush didn't (his transcript was leaked by a source, but BUSH didn't release it). Nor did Clinton or Bush41 or Carter. McCain did not release his records or Dole. And Romney certainly hasn't. Is he afraid?
Were Bush and Clinton and JFK and Reagan and Truman all "afraid," since none of them released their college records? Or did they all consider that their grades were not really important and/or private? In any case they did not release them. And Obama is just like they are. He hasn't released his either, nor did Romney. If that is because they are "afraid"---well then they are both afraid.
Romney is not an open book. What were his grades???
ReplyDeleteHe hasn't released them. Neither did Obama. Both are closed books; they are as closed as each other. Neither has to release his grades or his Selective Service files or his passport files, and both have chosen not to do so.
Romney is a man with a PROVEN record!Obama cannot even prove his birthplace! Give me a break! LOL Pastor Lee
DeleteNo president has ever shown more proof of being born in the USA than Obama. He has shown both the short form and the long form birth certificates. The facts on them were repeatedly confirmed by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii. They were further confirmed by the Index Data:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/04/in_hawaii_its_easy_to_get_birt.html
And they were still further confirmed by the birth notices that in 1961 were sent to the newspapers' Health Bureau Statistics sections ONLY by the DOH of Hawaii and only for births in Hawaii.
And still further confirmed by the witness who recalled being told "Stanley had a baby" and writing home about it to her father, also named Stanley (and the fact that her father was named Stanley and the fact that that the doctor was on the Obstetrics staff of Kapiolani Hospital have been checked, and Dr West did not retire until 1977 BTW).
Oh, and perhaps you did not see this:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/04/kapiolani-confirms/
That BTW is vastly more facts proving birth in the USA than Romney has supplied. Why should we trust Romney, who was born only a few miles from a foreign country, when Obama was born several thousand miles from any foreign country. Getting back to Romney's grades: Why is he hiding them? If he were proud of his grades surely he would publish them. But he hasn't, and he has not shown his Selective Service or passport records or his parents' marriage license either.
Both, I repeat 'BOTH,' parents must be US citizens...Obama, as a Senator, voted on this! His 'father' is listed as a Kenyan and as African...
DeleteRe: "Both, I repeat 'BOTH," parents..."
ReplyDeleteObama voted to ADD McCain's criteria for being president to the existing original definition, birth in the USA. Obama's and other senators' votes to add McCain's criteria---birth to two citizen parents on a US Naval Base---to the existing criterion does not change the original criterion.
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
For those who desire to do their own research:
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/scotus-natural-born-citizen-a-compendium.html
And this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_born_citizen
And this:
http://www.redstate.com/ironchapman/2012/05/24/english-common-law-and-american-law-a-digression/
And this:
http://naturalborncitizenshipresearch.blogspot.com/
And this:
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/05/early-use-of-the-term-natural-born-citizen/