Last week, the U.S. House Workforce Committee held a hearing on the Obama Labor Board's recent onslaught of Big Labor power grabs that undermine worker freedom.
National Labor Relations Board Chairman and former union lawyer Mark Pearce offered his spin after the hearing, calling the Board's decisions "fair and even-handed."
The outrageous complaint against Boeing hardly seems fair to the thousands of South Carolina workers who could be forced out of their jobs all because they can't be required to pay union dues or "fees" as a condition of employment.
But don't just take my word for it.
At the hearing, an individual employee victimized by one recent NLRB decision stood up and made her voice heard.
On July 22, Barbara Ivey learned the radical Service Employees International Union (SEIU) was launching a campaign to unionize her workplace.
Thirteen days later, her employer, Kaiser Permanente, announced that it was recognizing the union as the monopoly bargaining agent of all workers in the unit.
There was no secret ballot vote. No one from the SEIU ever contacted Ivey about whether or not she wanted to join or support the union.
Other workers told Ivey they felt pressured to sign so-called "union authorization cards."
But Kaiser Permanente agreed to recognize the union through the abusive card check process, and the workers faced an uphill battle to exercise their rights.
Relying on the National Right to Work Foundation-won Danaprecedent, Ivey utilized the only means left at her disposal. She asked her coworkers to sign a petition demanding a secret ballot vote.
By August 8, Ivey turned in a petition supported by 45 percent of her coworkers to request a decertification election. The NLRB set a private vote for September 20.
But before that vote could occur, the Board overturned Dana, canceling the election.
Barbara Ivey and her coworkers must now wait one to four years to request a new decertification election.
Ivey told the U.S. House panel, "For me and my fellow employees however, snatching away those rights just as an election has been agreed to and a date had been set was cruel and unethical."
Read the rest of her testimony by clicking here.
I'm sure you'll agree there's nothing "fair and even-handed" about her story.
Sincerely,
Mark Mix
P.S. The Foundation relies completely on voluntary contributions from its supporters to provide free legal aid.
If you can, please chip in with a tax-deductible contribution of $10 or more today to support the Foundation's programs.
No comments:
Post a Comment